One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
How much is a human life worth?
Page <<first <prev 11 of 12 next>
Jun 15, 2020 05:23:31   #
PeterS
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Stop with the fantasy psychoanalysis, the fking psychobabble about guns and ammo and political expediency and self-righteous moralism and the fallacy of accusing us of creating our entire world out of fallacies. You're just babbling prejudicial ignorant PC bulls**t and evading the question.

What is a human life worth?

Simple question, either you can answer it or you can't.



I must say, Peter, this - not so long as the Levins and Limbaughs of the world are the ones who create the lens that you see your world view through - is one of the most i***tic things I've ever heard.
Stop with the fantasy psychoanalysis, the fking ps... (show quote)

I thought I answered the question. I have no guns and the last thing I k**led was a deer when I was 17 years of age. If I had to k**l I would soon be dead. What is a human life worth--more than my own.

But that isn't the question because each ideology places a different value on life. It was you conservatives who proposed sacrificing the aged so as not to harm the economy by C***D. What's a human life worth? I find it incredibly ironic that a conservative would ask that.

And what is i***tic about you using Levins and the Limbaughs to form your view of the world? You didn't sit down and rationally form your view on your own. Your logic wouldn't be strewn with as many fallacies as it is if you had the ability to think for yourself. And I am surprised that nowhere in your journey towards a master's degree in English that no professor told you that the consistent use of fallacies would destroy your ability to think for yourself. That's why they are frowned upon when one is getting a liberal arts degree because if you come away with nothing else you should at least come away with the ability to think for yourself which sadly you clearly didn't...

Reply
Jun 15, 2020 07:06:46   #
Big Dolly
 
PeterS wrote:
Nicely said Dolly...


Thank you. I've been waiting at least half a century to get that of my chest.

Reply
Jun 15, 2020 08:08:17   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
JW wrote:
Murdering a child is never acceptable.

A being is a creature that is. That is, a being is in and of itself, a creature. A fetus is not a being because it is not a creature in and of itself. It is not self-sustaining. It is certainly human, in the same sense that your hair, once cut, is still identifiably human.

I have a pacemaker. Without it, I will die. Every year, I go to the clinic to have a personal examination of the function of the device. One of the tests is to slow the pacing to a point where my heart takes over on its own. My heart does not take over on its own within the range of the testing. Bluntly, if the pacing were to stop, my heart will likely slow to the point where my blood will spontaneously clot throughout my body... and I will be no more. Still I am a being, as are you. Our systems sustain themselves, albeit with a crutch, but we are independently functioning creatures.

I am not pro-a******n. I am pro-choice. I have no authority to foist upon you my mores and values and hold you accountable for violating them. You also lack that authority over me. We both lack it over a woman who chooses not to carry a developing human embryo to term... wh**ever her reasoning.

If you feel a******n is murder, don't abort, speak out against it if you wish and do your best to end the law that allows it. I will speak for the woman's right to choose the life she wants to live. However, a******n has been around since the beginning of human civilization and will continue wh**ever the current state of the law. Think to what degree you really have a right to interfere in the lives of people unconnected to you. I see none for me... or you.
Murdering a child is never acceptable. br br A be... (show quote)


I agree with much of what you are saying, as far as freedom is concerned. I am all for maximizing personal freedom. However, as an earlier post says, my personal freedom, and yours, stops when it harms another person. Where we disagree is that I know that a preborn child is a person. You believe it is a tissue mass belonging to the mother. So, yes, I will do anything I legally can to prevent an a******n. I regret interfering with a woman's choice, but I will not stand by and accept the murder of a child.

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2020 08:56:20   #
Rose42
 
PeterS wrote:
You're asking me that question? You're the one with the guns and are gleeful over how many rounds of ammunition you can carry on your person. You don't need to carry hundreds of rounds of ammunition if it's only a matter of self-defense so you either think your life if immensely valuable or the lives of others have no more value than the round of ammunition.

And Blade, you really should look up psychological projection and then read what you wrote--you are a man who has never done anything but spit in the face of those who think differently than you. I can at least come up with a rational reason to dislike what you people stand for. You can't do the same because your entire world is one you created out of fallacies. T***h to a con is something that supports an already preconceived notion or belief. People who say things that reinforce how you think are telling you the t***h--whether it's the t***h or not is completely irrelevant.

You want to talk about 'world view' well I can at least rationally test my world view but your world view would fall apart if you had to rationally examine it. There was a time when you people were the moral majority of this country (and rightly so) and you threw it all away solely for the sake of political expediency. You CC's had 16 people to choose from and you chose the most morally repugnant individual ever to run for the office of president. I'm an atheist and wouldn't v**e for Bill Clinton because of how he treated women. Trump is a happy adulterer and boasted of seeing no reason to repent for it and it didn't bother you people what-so-ever.

So Blade, I can put aside my prejudices but I know for certain that never in a million years will you be able to put aside your prejudices because you have no rational way to do so--not so long as the Levins and Limbaughs of the world are the ones who create the lens that you see your world view through...
You're asking me that question? You're the one wit... (show quote)


In other words, human life matters very little to you unless they share your political views. You've shown that many times.

Reply
Jun 15, 2020 10:07:05   #
TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!
 
JW wrote:
Murdering a child is never acceptable.

A being is a creature that is. That is, a being is in and of itself, a creature. A fetus is not a being because it is not a creature in and of itself. It is not self-sustaining. It is certainly human, in the same sense that your hair, once cut, is still identifiably human.

I have a pacemaker. Without it, I will die. Every year, I go to the clinic to have a personal examination of the function of the device. One of the tests is to slow the pacing to a point where my heart takes over on its own. My heart does not take over on its own within the range of the testing. Bluntly, if the pacing were to stop, my heart will likely slow to the point where my blood will spontaneously clot throughout my body... and I will be no more. Still I am a being, as are you. Our systems sustain themselves, albeit with a crutch, but we are independently functioning creatures.

I am not pro-a******n. I am pro-choice. I have no authority to foist upon you my mores and values and hold you accountable for violating them. You also lack that authority over me. We both lack it over a woman who chooses not to carry a developing human embryo to term... wh**ever her reasoning.

If you feel a******n is murder, don't abort, speak out against it if you wish and do your best to end the law that allows it. I will speak for the woman's right to choose the life she wants to live. However, a******n has been around since the beginning of human civilization and will continue wh**ever the current state of the law. Think to what degree you really have a right to interfere in the lives of people unconnected to you. I see none for me... or you.
Murdering a child is never acceptable. br br A be... (show quote)


You’re right! A******n has been around since the beginning of human civilization, just like MURDER has when Cain murdered Able! Murder is the taking of another’s life........Christians believe that life begins at the moment of conception because the Bible teaches this.......a******n is murder because life is ended!

Reply
Jun 15, 2020 13:56:38   #
Navigator
 
PeterS wrote:
All I am saying is aid and abet is as much as you can before the e******n. T***p w*n the last one by a total of 77,000 v**es over 4 states. If you guys start now you can easily eliminate twice that many v**es by the time the e******n rolls around...


Using your logic, President Trump is in like flint as a result of all the v**es the r**ts eliminated.

Reply
Jun 15, 2020 14:02:34   #
Navigator
 
JW wrote:
Murdering a child is never acceptable.

A being is a creature that is. That is, a being is in and of itself, a creature. A fetus is not a being because it is not a creature in and of itself. It is not self-sustaining. It is certainly human, in the same sense that your hair, once cut, is still identifiably human.

I have a pacemaker. Without it, I will die. Every year, I go to the clinic to have a personal examination of the function of the device. One of the tests is to slow the pacing to a point where my heart takes over on its own. My heart does not take over on its own within the range of the testing. Bluntly, if the pacing were to stop, my heart will likely slow to the point where my blood will spontaneously clot throughout my body... and I will be no more. Still I am a being, as are you. Our systems sustain themselves, albeit with a crutch, but we are independently functioning creatures.

I am not pro-a******n. I am pro-choice. I have no authority to foist upon you my mores and values and hold you accountable for violating them. You also lack that authority over me. We both lack it over a woman who chooses not to carry a developing human embryo to term... wh**ever her reasoning.

If you feel a******n is murder, don't abort, speak out against it if you wish and do your best to end the law that allows it. I will speak for the woman's right to choose the life she wants to live. However, a******n has been around since the beginning of human civilization and will continue wh**ever the current state of the law. Think to what degree you really have a right to interfere in the lives of people unconnected to you. I see none for me... or you.
Murdering a child is never acceptable. br br A be... (show quote)


Of course we have a right, as a civilization, to interfere in the lives of people unconnected to us. We insist that those who k**l or rob people we have no connections to are apprehended and tried for their crimes. The same should apply to women who make the choice to have their unborn children murdered and those providers who actually commit those murders.

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2020 14:39:11   #
PeterS
 
Navigator wrote:
Using your logic, President Trump is in like flint as a result of all the v**es the r**ts eliminated.

Touché. Nicely done...

Reply
Jun 15, 2020 15:44:23   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
PeterS wrote:
I thought I answered the question. I have no guns and the last thing I k**led was a deer when I was 17 years of age. If I had to k**l I would soon be dead. What is a human life worth--more than my own.

But that isn't the question because each ideology places a different value on life. It was you conservatives who proposed sacrificing the aged so as not to harm the economy by C***D. What's a human life worth? I find it incredibly ironic that a conservative would ask that.

And what is i***tic about you using Levins and the Limbaughs to form your view of the world? You didn't sit down and rationally form your view on your own. Your logic wouldn't be strewn with as many fallacies as it is if you had the ability to think for yourself. And I am surprised that nowhere in your journey towards a master's degree in English that no professor told you that the consistent use of fallacies would destroy your ability to think for yourself. That's why they are frowned upon when one is getting a liberal arts degree because if you come away with nothing else you should at least come away with the ability to think for yourself which sadly you clearly didn't...
I thought I answered the question. I have no guns ... (show quote)
No, you did not answer the question.

However, maybe you can explain the logic, reasoning and critical thought you applied in assuming a false premise about people you know nothing about then expanding on that with a string of presumptuous bulls**t about how I formed my world view, what professors taught in my college courses, and my ability to think for myself.

Out of thin air, with absolutely nothing more than fallacious fabrications, you make brazen, arrogant, and ignorant accusations like "You didn't sit down and rationally form your view on your own".

Or how about this little gem, you are "surprised that nowhere in your journey towards a master's degree in English that no professor told you that the consistent use of fallacies would destroy your ability to think for yourself."

I've seen some outrageous lies manufactured to attack another "human life", but you win the blue ribbon. Your personal attack on me is a fine example of postmodern philosophy in action. Suspend logic and reason and just make words mean what you want them to mean.

Nothing you have said about me is true.

So, once again, Peter, How much is a human life worth?

Reply
Jun 15, 2020 18:10:07   #
JW
 
RandyBrian wrote:
I agree with much of what you are saying, as far as freedom is concerned. I am all for maximizing personal freedom. However, as an earlier post says, my personal freedom, and yours, stops when it harms another person. Where we disagree is that I know that a preborn child is a person. You believe it is a tissue mass belonging to the mother. So, yes, I will do anything I legally can to prevent an a******n. I regret interfering with a woman's choice, but I will not stand by and accept the murder of a child.
I agree with much of what you are saying, as far a... (show quote)


OK, exactly what is a person? The following is an unimpeachable and generally acknowledged description.

“We are the sum total of our experiences. Those experiences – be they positive or negative – make us the person we are, at any given point in our lives."
Quote by B.J. Neblett

Since a fetus has no minimally functioning brain until the second trimester and no neural function at all for the first six weeks, its experiences are not even knowable by itself... if being confined in a fluid filled sack with nothing to contrast that with can constitute experience. Personhood isn't even a rational assessment.

Devolve this discussion to an argument about DNA and cutting your fingernails can become part of the considerations.

The bottom line is a religious argument and all religious arguments are between the individual and his/her deity. Your religious beliefs have no relevance to anyone not a co-subscriber, and your interference is totally unwarranted.

Reply
Jun 15, 2020 18:15:36   #
JW
 
TexaCan wrote:
You’re right! A******n has been around since the beginning of human civilization, just like MURDER has when Cain murdered Able! Murder is the taking of another’s life........Christians believe that life begins at the moment of conception because the Bible teaches this.......a******n is murder because life is ended!


How do Christian values have any relevance to non-Christians or people who understand life processes as a natural occurrences as defined by science?

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2020 18:24:05   #
JW
 
Navigator wrote:
Of course we have a right, as a civilization, to interfere in the lives of people unconnected to us. We insist that those who k**l or rob people we have no connections to are apprehended and tried for their crimes. The same should apply to women who make the choice to have their unborn children murdered and those providers who actually commit those murders.


We, as a civilized society, have ceded to society the authority to regulate murder and robbery. A******n has not been so regulated at this time. You appear to stand your absolutist view on a religious basis... religion is the only absolute foundation for any thought process. Your religious views are irrelevant to anyone rejecting them.

Reply
Jun 15, 2020 19:41:29   #
Navigator
 
JW wrote:
OK, exactly what is a person? The following is an unimpeachable and generally acknowledged description.

“We are the sum total of our experiences. Those experiences – be they positive or negative – make us the person we are, at any given point in our lives."
Quote by B.J. Neblett

Since a fetus has no minimally functioning brain until the second trimester and no neural function at all for the first six weeks, its experiences are not even knowable by itself... if being confined in a fluid filled sack with nothing to contrast that with can constitute experience. Personhood isn't even a rational assessment.

Devolve this discussion to an argument about DNA and cutting your fingernails can become part of the considerations.

The bottom line is a religious argument and all religious arguments are between the individual and his/her deity. Your religious beliefs have no relevance to anyone not a co-subscriber, and your interference is totally unwarranted.
OK, exactly what is a person? The following is an ... (show quote)


You denounce religious reasons for condemning a******n then give a metaphysical definition of life to support it. Opposition to a******n is at its basic level is a condemnation of the termination of a scientifically defined life as a human, not religious, morality violation.

Reply
Jun 15, 2020 21:13:25   #
JW
 
Navigator wrote:
You denounce religious reasons for condemning a******n then give a metaphysical definition of life to support it. Opposition to a******n is at its basic level is a condemnation of the termination of a scientifically defined life as a human, not religious, morality violation.


I do not 'denounce' religious reasons for anything. You may base your views on any basis you choose. What I denounce is your presumption that your religious reasons have any bearing on any non-subscriber.

I have not given any definition of life. What I have offered is a description of personhood that it universally acceptable and is undeniably a truism.

You really owe it to both of us to make a real effort to understand what I've written. Enough with attributions based on nothing more than your own internal gases.

Reply
Jun 15, 2020 22:14:57   #
PeterS
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
No, you did not answer the question.

However, maybe you can explain the logic, reasoning and critical thought you applied in assuming a false premise about people you know nothing about then expanding on that with a string of presumptuous bulls**t about how I formed my world view, what professors taught in my college courses, and my ability to think for myself.

Out of thin air, with absolutely nothing more than fallacious fabrications, you make brazen, arrogant, and ignorant accusations like "You didn't sit down and rationally form your view on your own".

Or how about this little gem, you are "surprised that nowhere in your journey towards a master's degree in English that no professor told you that the consistent use of fallacies would destroy your ability to think for yourself."

I've seen some outrageous lies manufactured to attack another "human life", but you win the blue ribbon. Your personal attack on me is a fine example of postmodern philosophy in action. Suspend logic and reason and just make words mean what you want them to mean.

Nothing you have said about me is true.

So, once again, Peter, How much is a human life worth?
No, you did not answer the question. br br Howeve... (show quote)

Oh bull, everything I've said about you is true. I know how you formed your world view because one by one I've waded through the fallacies you've used to create it. Do you think you are too aloof for someone to understand the complexities of a 'Blade-Runner'? You are one of the easiest to understand Blade. You are a conservatives conservative, a regressive macho-man who continually reinforces your ideology via the Levins, the Limbaughs, and all the other RW talking heads that you use to do your thinking for you. Your world is one of propaganda where Trump hires Rosenstein and Rosenstein hires Mueller and Mueller is a patsy of the Clintons and Obama yet for that logic to hold Trump would have to be in on it too. Oops how did that one slip in?

And who fed you that little conspiracy theory Blade...Levin, Limbaugh, one of Fox's talking heads? You never were able to figure out why it didn't work, did you! That's the problem with being breastfed on logical fallacies all your life--you lose the ability to think for yourself. That's why wh**ever education you've received you've wasted because you prefer a world of make-believe to one of reality. I don't know what your professors taught--all I know is that no one who is as married to logical fallacies as you are could get a master's degree in English from an accredited liberal arts college. I say that because I know no English professor would tolerate a student who could only communicate through the use of fallacies. So, if you got a masters as you say you did, it was through a religious school or on-line university--someplace where critical thinking sk**ls weren't expected and you could bull s**t your way to a 3.57.

And you are once again using projection Blade. "Make words mean what you want them to mean" is the whole reason that you use logical fallacies. You spend your days creating the world as you want it with liberals as the e-vile bad boys and you CC's so saintly the sweet smell of your turds smells of lilacs and rose water. And if I'm the one who's used fallacies to create my world view then show me how I've done it. I've certainly spent enough of my time showing you where your love of fallacies lies. If I am guilty of the same then show me where I am doing it...okay!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 12 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.