Witnesses are necessary and here is why: In an unpublished manuscript of John Bolton’s forthcoming book, the former national security adviser said that President Trump told him...

Kevyn

In an unpublished manuscript of John Bolton’s forthcoming book, the former national security adviser said that President Trump told him firsthand that he wanted to continue freezing military aid to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. We need to hear from Bolton and others under oath.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Kevyn wrote:

In an unpublished manuscript of John Bolton’s forthcoming book, the former national security adviser said that President Trump told him firsthand that he wanted to continue freezing military aid to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. We need to hear from Bolton and others under oath.

Hearsay and he’selling a book~~

Likewise Bolton said if under Subpoena he would testify... Yet, the Dems didn’t, now they want him~~

Buck Loc: Valparaiso,IN

Get a job FOOL.

Kevyn

lindajoy wrote:

Hearsay and he’selling a book~~

Likewise Bolton said if under Subpoena he would testify... Yet, the Dems didn’t, now they want him~~

They didn’t have the time to wait for subpoenas to work through the courts, and he is a direct witness his testimony is in no way hearsay.

Radiance3

Kevyn wrote:

In an unpublished manuscript of John Bolton’s forthcoming book, the former national security adviser said that President Trump told him firsthand that he wanted to continue freezing military aid to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. We need to hear from Bolton and others under oath.

===================
Kevin, Bolton was disgruntled human being after removed from post. His book story are all under the p**********l and executive privileges to making sound decisions, how to provide the aid to Ukraine to ensure compliance of agreement and prior frauds have been cleaned up. I already explained that to PeterS earlier. Yours is a repeat.

the impeachment was completed at the House floor basement in secret with locked doors. There was no participation of the GOP minority.

Schift, Nadler, and Pelosi finalized the Articles of Impeachment. The Articles were given to Pelosi which she held for 33 days, before submitting to the Senate floor for trial.

Schitt, Nadler, and the 8 democrat jurors recited their case for 3 days at the Senate Floor. Was completed, and now the GOP's turn to rebuttal their issues:
1. Abuse of power, 2. Obstruction of Congress.

Problems in this Article:
1. The proceedings in Congress was unconstitutional. Democrats prevented the participation of the GOP team to question.
2. All Witnesses of Congress were called to testify. None allowed of the minority GOP's.
3. The offense Schitt and Nadler reported were not impeachable crimes.
Here are Impeachable Crimes allowed by Hamilton in the Constitution:
President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
4. The crimes listed by Schitt, and Nadler, and Pelosi do not count as impeachable crimes. In fact, those activities have been done by prior presidents.
5. The Senate's duty is to put the Articles on Trial. Congress could no longer return to their impeachment detail by adding witnesses. Those were done by the Lower Chamber. Now, the Senate has tried the validity of your case.

6. Senate could now dismiss the Impeachment Article for lack of merits. as impeachable offense, in addition to the unconstitutional proceedings conducted by the House of Representative at the basement. Participation of the GOP minority was prevented. Clinton had so many valid impeachable offenses, and was properly conducted with full participation of the minority party, according to the constitution.
7. Senate decision: The president is innocent of all charges, and must be acquitted.
Schitt, Nadler, and Pelosi, could be sued and locked up for serious violations of the president's rights, while discharging his p**********l duties.

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

Kevyn wrote:

In an unpublished manuscript of John Bolton’s forthcoming book, the former national security adviser said that President Trump told him firsthand that he wanted to continue freezing military aid to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. We need to hear from Bolton and others under oath.

I don't care what anybody else on this thread says---Yes Bolton should testify and yes it is a cover up to not allow witnesses. It is a r****d court far from impartial.

Radiance3

Coos Bay Tom wrote:

I don't care what anybody else on this thread says---Yes Bolton should testify and yes it is a cover up to not allow witnesses. It is a r****d court far from impartial.

==============
The impeachment process by Schitt, Nadler, and Pelosi was already done at the locked basement of the House chamber. They should have called Bolton there. No more of that those witnesses. It is now the GOP defense to rebut.

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

Kevyn wrote:

In an unpublished manuscript of John Bolton’s forthcoming book, the former national security adviser said that President Trump told him firsthand that he wanted to continue freezing military aid to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. We need to hear from Bolton and others under oath.

You will get nothing, if your team wants it.....no way in hell would any sane person allow that to happen.

sit back, listen to todays smack down of the lying ass Dems and the shiffstains of your party.

enjoy the show Kevvy.....that's all you can do at this point....sit down. shut the hell up.........emphasis on the shut the hell up part.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Kevyn wrote:

They didn’t have the time to wait for subpoenas to work through the courts, and he is a direct witness his testimony is in no way hearsay.

Didn’t have the time to wait for one??? You can’t be serious... Given their positions they hand deliver them to a judge who signs off..

He offered they changed their mind and never seeked a Subpoena. Period

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Kevyn wrote:

They didn’t have the time to wait for subpoenas to work through the courts, and he is a direct witness his testimony is in no way hearsay.

Get some education. You are a scholar at lying I’ll give you that.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

lindajoy wrote:

Didn’t have the time to wait for one??? You can’t be serious... Given their positions they hand deliver them to a judge who signs off..

He offered they changed their mind and never seeked a Subpoena. Period

Exactly why I told dummy to get some education. Besides Trump can still cite EP. Not up to Bolton.
They should v**e to stop this charade. When two House managers, Schiff and Nader, have been caught lying there is no reason to go on. I kinda wish they would. It’s helping Trumps poll numbers. If you can believe the polls.

Lonewolf

lindajoy wrote:

Hearsay and he’selling a book~~

Likewise Bolton said if under Subpoena he would testify... Yet, the Dems didn’t, now they want him~~

He said he would testify in the Senate trump blocked him from talking to the house

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Lonewolf wrote:

He said he would testify in the Senate trump blocked him from talking to the house

It’s called Executive Privilege. All presidents have used it, especially where national security is involved. Got news for you dummy, Trump can cite Ex. Pr. in the Senate also.

vernon

Kevyn wrote:

In an unpublished manuscript of John Bolton’s forthcoming book, the former national security adviser said that President Trump told him firsthand that he wanted to continue freezing military aid to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. We need to hear from Bolton and others under oath.

Then why didn't the lying bastards subpoena him. I guess you didn't notice he came up with this just as his book is being released. And just what makes the Bidens so holy they shouldn't be investigated they are are
the most corrupt politicians in the demoRAT party and that is sating a lot.

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

JFlorio wrote:

It’s called Executive Privilege. All presidents have used it, especially where national security is involved. Got news for you dummy, Trump can cite Ex. Pr. in the Senate also.

We don't need no stinking witnesses--- Anything goes in this presidency---A third -forth and a fifth term for the supreme leader.