eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Judas, your inability in reaching reality is at least consistent.

"So, in my opinion, whether it be Biden, Romney, or whomever, as long as they are "about the business of America" as opposed to just 'big business, big money, etc." - JediKnothead

Apparently, Judas has no clue to how the economy is doing for the majority of Americans..

JediKnight

Considering that there is so much more to life than just the "economy" - I consider your statement irrelevant.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

"Considering that there is so much more to life than just the "economy" - I consider your statement irrelevant." - Jedi

Sure you would.
I rest my case.

How about record low unemployment for all categories of citizens?
Greater optimism for the future?

JediKnight

eagle: I have never been "hung up" on money. Growing up, I got used to not having an excess of money, and had to learn to make do with less. Today I see money as a necessary economic tool -no more, no less.

I have tried to explain to you several times that the "unemployment numbers" are easily manipulated in several ways. The easiest way to produce "wh**ever numbers you want" is through what's know as "standard deviation." You take the mean unemployment number, and extrapolate that number out using decimals until it displays the figure you want. Of course, most people will not understand that process, and it can be a bit confusing. So, here's another way to easily change the job numbers: do not count the millions that were receiving unemployment once their benefits run out. Do not count those who have "registered with state and local unemployment offices" because since they are now "in the system" they don't have to be counted as raw unemployed people. Once you do those two things, you will find the number of "unemployed" has dropped significantly -voila! =low unemployment.
I know that the government employs such tactics whenever they want to appease the masses that our economy is better off than we think. The trick is in watching the actual labor market - not that bogus monthly report claiming "238,000 jobs were just added" - that's just the government ceasing to count those who's benefits just dried up. simple.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

So, what is your take on the collapse in the price of crude oil.
32 bucks a barrel.

Oil shale needs 42 +/- to break even to refine it.

JediKnight

Just a "shell game" the big corporations play...with the stock market down, dropping the oil is intended to give the market a boost.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Jedi;
Do you think America would v**e in a C*******t sympathizer to be their President?

Do you think they have enough confidence in an absent minded socialist to lead our country?
Democrats have two poor choices.
The rest were even worse.

JediKnight

No, America fears c*******m -which is really strange because we are currently moving towards a dictatorship-which of course is based on c*******m.

No, Bernie can never win because too many people associate "socialism" with "c*******m."

Democrats may have 'poor choices' in your opinion. However, I noticed that republicans only have ONE choice...Trump....go back to my first statement to see what's wrong with the republican plan. sad.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

A successful America is a b***h for Democrats. Their power has been slipping away.
Trump reversed the direction the Democrats were taking us.
Trump is taking us away from CFR g*******t domination..
Trump is the first president in decades who's cabinet is not filled with CFR members.

Some CFR commentary
http://www.alpheus.org/html/source_materials/parapolitics/CFR_NWO.htm

The 3,000 seats of the CFR quickly filled with members of America's elite. Today,CFR members occupy key positions in government, the mass media, financial institutions, multinational corporations, the military, and the national security apparatus.
Since its inception, the CFR has served as an intermediary between high finance, big oil, corporate elitists and the U.S. government. The executive branch changes hands between Republican and Democratic administrations, but cabinet seats are always held by CFR members. It has been said by political commentators on the left and on the right that if you want to know what U.S. foreign policy will be next year, you should read Foreign Affairs this year.
The CFR's claim that "The Council has no affiliation with the U.S. government" is laughable. The justification for that statement is that funding comes from member dues, subscriptions to its Corporate Program, foundation grants, and so forth. All this really means is that the U.S. government does not exert any control over the CFR via the purse strings.
In reality, CFR members are very tightly affiliated with the U.S. government. Since 1940, every U.S. secretary of state (except for Gov. James Byrnes of South Carolina, the sole exception) has been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and/or its younger brother, the Trilateral Commission. Also since 1940, every secretary of war and every secretary of defense has been a CFR member. During most of its existence, the Central Intelligence Agency has been headed by CFR members, beginning with CFR founding member Allen Dulles. Virtually every key U.S. national security and foreign policy adviser has been a CFR member for the past seventy years.
Almost all White House cabinet positions are occupied by CFR members. President Clinton, himself a member of the CFR, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group, employs almost one hundred CFR members in his administration. Presidents come and go, but the CFR's power--and agenda--always remains.

son of witless

" However, I noticed that republicans only have ONE choice...Trump...." In 2012 the Democrats had only one Choice Obama. Every time I think you can't possibly top yourself in brilliance, you prove me wrong. The rest of you guys are just as brilliant in nominating that sharp as a tack former Vice President H****r B***n. Excuse me, I just had a Biden moment. See the brilliance is wearing off on me.

JediKnight

You're deflecting again. There were several democratic choices, as well as independents, green party, etc., on the 2012 ticket. Every time I think you're starting to display a little bit of common sense you prove me wrong. I guess Emerson was right when he said, "...common sense seems to be the least common of all..."

Your president is failing miserably....and that's NOT a Biden moment -its a Trump moment.

son of witless

Hold the presses. Independents and Green Party do not count. You and I are speaking of Democrat Party choices in 2012. Tell, cause I do not recall, who the Hell were these " several democratic choices, " ? I am drawing a total blank on this.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Judas. The economic manipulation is always a Bankster thingy. The Great Depression was a good example.

The question is when do the Internationalist bankers go into their harvest mode?

JediKnight

There is nothing wrong with your fingers! Try google or Wikipedia...but John Wolfe comes to mind as one, I believe Hillary was also in the mix for a minute, as well as others.

You do know that no matter which party you are "registered in" you can still v**e for the candidate of your choice right?

JediKnight

In my opinion, the mass wealth of this country is controlled largely by republicans...who's main desire is to keep it that way at all costs...which is why we have Trump and complicit republicans currently ruining the country.