Are you up to date with Agenda 21 now advanced to agenda 2030?
It's been unfolding for a few decades now. In Washington state there where hundreds of sites anyone could camp, fish next to rivers and lakes. All have been road blocked, gated, with no access.
California has been removing land owners off their land and most recently did so with several thousand acres in Northern California.
Oregon State has followed these absurdities.
I can only verify these states having lived and traveled them. The goal has been to push rural living into large cities, even small towns and cities into large cities.

Jack

Very interesting there NPP but does the left realize that no one actually owns all of these houses and that the state is the actual owner of said property as it is. We all pay rent to the state for our homes as it is and that rent ins in the form of property taxes. If one who "owns a home" forgets or can't afford their property taxes for one year guess what happens to your home? The state kicks you out of the home and takes over possession and you are out in the cold. I believe that every state in the union has property taxes so then very state owns all of the property. That means their are fifty property owners in the United States as it is.

Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to Combat “C*****e C****e”



Progressives who want to combat “c*****e c****e” aren’t just proposing increased government control over people’s eating and travel habits. Now, they want to target home ownership.

In a recent op-ed printed by far-left magazine The Nation, UCLA Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Kian Goh states that people need to “seriously question the ideal of private home ownership” due to the need to “keep cities safe in the face of c*****e c****e”.

The assistant professor goes on to assert that the world only has twelve years to contain g****l w*****g, and that people who think that living in a single-family home in a suburban area is a good idea need to rethink their ideas of success, comfort, and home.

The op-ed would be laughable if it isn’t for the fact that there are plenty of far-left activists who actually believe any of it is based on actual facts. However, it follows the same logic that Democratic lawmakers are acting on.

In Virginia, new legislation currently being considered by the state legislature would essentially end single-family-only zoning, allowing duplexes to be built on any plot of land. While the bill is being pitched by some supporters as a way to end “segregation”, others are stating that it is an environmentally-friendly bill that would allow for extra housing to be built near public t***sport facilities.

Naturally, the wishes of homeowners who would lose green areas of land and peaceful, quiet, safe neighborhoods aren’t actually important. Neither are the concerns of those who want to own their own house on their own tract of land because such desires are apparently not “eco-friendly” in today’s woke world.

In fact, Kian Goh goes further than any state legislature has in the past, advocating for a wide range of government-controlled housing options that no one in their right mind would find attractive. The assistant professor advocates for rental housing, but on the absurd condition that it would be “de-linked from wealth creation.” In other words, landlords can buy houses and rent them out as long as they don’t make money from doing so.
Scientists: A "Salt" works better than top drug for diabetes

Public housing is yet another option presented to the masses, without regard for the fact that government involvement in private business never turns out well for average individuals. This ideal is currently being backed by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who recently proposed a “Housing for All Act” that would require the U.S. government to spend a whopping $1 trillion on public housing.

Cooperative housing is yet another option to pick from, because being forced to live with random people is just great in a world where people are being increasingly conditions to look out for “microaggressions.”

Home ownership used to be a widely-accepted idea as sensible people on both sides of the aisle understood the importance of having a place to call home. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Progressives are eager to “level the playing field” by making life miserable for anyone who happens to have the money to buy their own home in a suburban area.

Far-left activists on one hand proclaim that “housing is a right,” while at the same time making it clear that “housing” doesn’t mean one’s own home — but rather a government-owned space you have no control over.

Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to Combat “C*****e C****e”



Progressives who want to combat “c*****e c****e” aren’t just proposing increased government control over people’s eating and travel habits. Now, they want to target home ownership.

In a recent op-ed printed by far-left magazine The Nation, UCLA Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Kian Goh states that people need to “seriously question the ideal of private home ownership” due to the need to “keep cities safe in the face of c*****e c****e”.

The assistant professor goes on to assert that the world only has twelve years to contain g****l w*****g, and that people who think that living in a single-family home in a suburban area is a good idea need to rethink their ideas of success, comfort, and home.

The op-ed would be laughable if it isn’t for the fact that there are plenty of far-left activists who actually believe any of it is based on actual facts. However, it follows the same logic that Democratic lawmakers are acting on.

In Virginia, new legislation currently being considered by the state legislature would essentially end single-family-only zoning, allowing duplexes to be built on any plot of land. While the bill is being pitched by some supporters as a way to end “segregation”, others are stating that it is an environmentally-friendly bill that would allow for extra housing to be built near public t***sport facilities.

Naturally, the wishes of homeowners who would lose green areas of land and peaceful, quiet, safe neighborhoods aren’t actually important. Neither are the concerns of those who want to own their own house on their own tract of land because such desires are apparently not “eco-friendly” in today’s woke world.

In fact, Kian Goh goes further than any state legislature has in the past, advocating for a wide range of government-controlled housing options that no one in their right mind would find attractive. The assistant professor advocates for rental housing, but on the absurd condition that it would be “de-linked from wealth creation.” In other words, landlords can buy houses and rent them out as long as they don’t make money from doing so.
Scientists: A "Salt" works better than top drug for diabetes

Public housing is yet another option presented to the masses, without regard for the fact that government involvement in private business never turns out well for average individuals. This ideal is currently being backed by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who recently proposed a “Housing for All Act” that would require the U.S. government to spend a whopping $1 trillion on public housing.

Cooperative housing is yet another option to pick from, because being forced to live with random people is just great in a world where people are being increasingly conditions to look out for “microaggressions.”

Home ownership used to be a widely-accepted idea as sensible people on both sides of the aisle understood the importance of having a place to call home. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Progressives are eager to “level the playing field” by making life miserable for anyone who happens to have the money to buy their own home in a suburban area.

Far-left activists on one hand proclaim that “housing is a right,” while at the same time making it clear that “housing” doesn’t mean one’s own home — but rather a government-owned space you have no control over.