Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to Combat “C*****e C****e”
Progressives who want to combat “c*****e c****e” aren’t just proposing increased government control over people’s eating and travel habits. Now, they want to target home ownership.
In a recent op-ed printed by far-left magazine The Nation, UCLA Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Kian Goh states that people need to “seriously question the ideal of private home ownership” due to the need to “keep cities safe in the face of c*****e c****e”.
The assistant professor goes on to assert that the world only has twelve years to contain g****l w*****g, and that people who think that living in a single-family home in a suburban area is a good idea need to rethink their ideas of success, comfort, and home.
The op-ed would be laughable if it isn’t for the fact that there are plenty of far-left activists who actually believe any of it is based on actual facts. However, it follows the same logic that Democratic lawmakers are acting on.
In Virginia, new legislation currently being considered by the state legislature would essentially end single-family-only zoning, allowing duplexes to be built on any plot of land. While the bill is being pitched by some supporters as a way to end “segregation”, others are stating that it is an environmentally-friendly bill that would allow for extra housing to be built near public t***sport facilities.
Naturally, the wishes of homeowners who would lose green areas of land and peaceful, quiet, safe neighborhoods aren’t actually important. Neither are the concerns of those who want to own their own house on their own tract of land because such desires are apparently not “eco-friendly” in today’s woke world.
In fact, Kian Goh goes further than any state legislature has in the past, advocating for a wide range of government-controlled housing options that no one in their right mind would find attractive. The assistant professor advocates for rental housing, but on the absurd condition that it would be “de-linked from wealth creation.” In other words, landlords can buy houses and rent them out as long as they don’t make money from doing so.
Scientists: A "Salt" works better than top drug for diabetes
Public housing is yet another option presented to the masses, without regard for the fact that government involvement in private business never turns out well for average individuals. This ideal is currently being backed by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who recently proposed a “Housing for All Act” that would require the U.S. government to spend a whopping $1 trillion on public housing.
Cooperative housing is yet another option to pick from, because being forced to live with random people is just great in a world where people are being increasingly conditions to look out for “microaggressions.”
Home ownership used to be a widely-accepted idea as sensible people on both sides of the aisle understood the importance of having a place to call home. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Progressives are eager to “level the playing field” by making life miserable for anyone who happens to have the money to buy their own home in a suburban area.
Far-left activists on one hand proclaim that “housing is a right,” while at the same time making it clear that “housing” doesn’t mean one’s own home — but rather a government-owned space you have no control over.
no propaganda please wrote:
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to Combat “C*****e C****e”
Progressives who want to combat “c*****e c****e” aren’t just proposing increased government control over people’s eating and travel habits. Now, they want to target home ownership.
In a recent op-ed printed by far-left magazine The Nation, UCLA Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Kian Goh states that people need to “seriously question the ideal of private home ownership” due to the need to “keep cities safe in the face of c*****e c****e”.
The assistant professor goes on to assert that the world only has twelve years to contain g****l w*****g, and that people who think that living in a single-family home in a suburban area is a good idea need to rethink their ideas of success, comfort, and home.
The op-ed would be laughable if it isn’t for the fact that there are plenty of far-left activists who actually believe any of it is based on actual facts. However, it follows the same logic that Democratic lawmakers are acting on.
In Virginia, new legislation currently being considered by the state legislature would essentially end single-family-only zoning, allowing duplexes to be built on any plot of land. While the bill is being pitched by some supporters as a way to end “segregation”, others are stating that it is an environmentally-friendly bill that would allow for extra housing to be built near public t***sport facilities.
Naturally, the wishes of homeowners who would lose green areas of land and peaceful, quiet, safe neighborhoods aren’t actually important. Neither are the concerns of those who want to own their own house on their own tract of land because such desires are apparently not “eco-friendly” in today’s woke world.
In fact, Kian Goh goes further than any state legislature has in the past, advocating for a wide range of government-controlled housing options that no one in their right mind would find attractive. The assistant professor advocates for rental housing, but on the absurd condition that it would be “de-linked from wealth creation.” In other words, landlords can buy houses and rent them out as long as they don’t make money from doing so.
Scientists: A "Salt" works better than top drug for diabetes
Public housing is yet another option presented to the masses, without regard for the fact that government involvement in private business never turns out well for average individuals. This ideal is currently being backed by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who recently proposed a “Housing for All Act” that would require the U.S. government to spend a whopping $1 trillion on public housing.
Cooperative housing is yet another option to pick from, because being forced to live with random people is just great in a world where people are being increasingly conditions to look out for “microaggressions.”
Home ownership used to be a widely-accepted idea as sensible people on both sides of the aisle understood the importance of having a place to call home. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Progressives are eager to “level the playing field” by making life miserable for anyone who happens to have the money to buy their own home in a suburban area.
Far-left activists on one hand proclaim that “housing is a right,” while at the same time making it clear that “housing” doesn’t mean one’s own home — but rather a government-owned space you have no control over.
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to C... (
show quote)
I would truly be embarrassed to let anyone know I believe even one sentence you posted
no propaganda please wrote:
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to Combat “C*****e C****e”
Progressives who want to combat “c*****e c****e” aren’t just proposing increased government control over people’s eating and travel habits. Now, they want to target home ownership.
In a recent op-ed printed by far-left magazine The Nation, UCLA Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Kian Goh states that people need to “seriously question the ideal of private home ownership” due to the need to “keep cities safe in the face of c*****e c****e”.
The assistant professor goes on to assert that the world only has twelve years to contain g****l w*****g, and that people who think that living in a single-family home in a suburban area is a good idea need to rethink their ideas of success, comfort, and home.
The op-ed would be laughable if it isn’t for the fact that there are plenty of far-left activists who actually believe any of it is based on actual facts. However, it follows the same logic that Democratic lawmakers are acting on.
In Virginia, new legislation currently being considered by the state legislature would essentially end single-family-only zoning, allowing duplexes to be built on any plot of land. While the bill is being pitched by some supporters as a way to end “segregation”, others are stating that it is an environmentally-friendly bill that would allow for extra housing to be built near public t***sport facilities.
Naturally, the wishes of homeowners who would lose green areas of land and peaceful, quiet, safe neighborhoods aren’t actually important. Neither are the concerns of those who want to own their own house on their own tract of land because such desires are apparently not “eco-friendly” in today’s woke world.
In fact, Kian Goh goes further than any state legislature has in the past, advocating for a wide range of government-controlled housing options that no one in their right mind would find attractive. The assistant professor advocates for rental housing, but on the absurd condition that it would be “de-linked from wealth creation.” In other words, landlords can buy houses and rent them out as long as they don’t make money from doing so.
Scientists: A "Salt" works better than top drug for diabetes
Public housing is yet another option presented to the masses, without regard for the fact that government involvement in private business never turns out well for average individuals. This ideal is currently being backed by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who recently proposed a “Housing for All Act” that would require the U.S. government to spend a whopping $1 trillion on public housing.
Cooperative housing is yet another option to pick from, because being forced to live with random people is just great in a world where people are being increasingly conditions to look out for “microaggressions.”
Home ownership used to be a widely-accepted idea as sensible people on both sides of the aisle understood the importance of having a place to call home. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Progressives are eager to “level the playing field” by making life miserable for anyone who happens to have the money to buy their own home in a suburban area.
Far-left activists on one hand proclaim that “housing is a right,” while at the same time making it clear that “housing” doesn’t mean one’s own home — but rather a government-owned space you have no control over.
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to C... (
show quote)
I have heard of think tanks that come up with great ideas. So many people who opine on the forum have attended "STINK TANKS" and this is one of them. I just commented on another one who wants peoples guns confiscated and abolish police departments.
no propaganda please wrote:
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to Combat “C*****e C****e”
Progressives who want to combat “c*****e c****e” aren’t just proposing increased government control over people’s eating and travel habits. Now, they want to target home ownership.
In a recent op-ed printed by far-left magazine The Nation, UCLA Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Kian Goh states that people need to “seriously question the ideal of private home ownership” due to the need to “keep cities safe in the face of c*****e c****e”.
The assistant professor goes on to assert that the world only has twelve years to contain g****l w*****g, and that people who think that living in a single-family home in a suburban area is a good idea need to rethink their ideas of success, comfort, and home.
The op-ed would be laughable if it isn’t for the fact that there are plenty of far-left activists who actually believe any of it is based on actual facts. However, it follows the same logic that Democratic lawmakers are acting on.
In Virginia, new legislation currently being considered by the state legislature would essentially end single-family-only zoning, allowing duplexes to be built on any plot of land. While the bill is being pitched by some supporters as a way to end “segregation”, others are stating that it is an environmentally-friendly bill that would allow for extra housing to be built near public t***sport facilities.
Naturally, the wishes of homeowners who would lose green areas of land and peaceful, quiet, safe neighborhoods aren’t actually important. Neither are the concerns of those who want to own their own house on their own tract of land because such desires are apparently not “eco-friendly” in today’s woke world.
In fact, Kian Goh goes further than any state legislature has in the past, advocating for a wide range of government-controlled housing options that no one in their right mind would find attractive. The assistant professor advocates for rental housing, but on the absurd condition that it would be “de-linked from wealth creation.” In other words, landlords can buy houses and rent them out as long as they don’t make money from doing so.
Scientists: A "Salt" works better than top drug for diabetes
Public housing is yet another option presented to the masses, without regard for the fact that government involvement in private business never turns out well for average individuals. This ideal is currently being backed by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who recently proposed a “Housing for All Act” that would require the U.S. government to spend a whopping $1 trillion on public housing.
Cooperative housing is yet another option to pick from, because being forced to live with random people is just great in a world where people are being increasingly conditions to look out for “microaggressions.”
Home ownership used to be a widely-accepted idea as sensible people on both sides of the aisle understood the importance of having a place to call home. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Progressives are eager to “level the playing field” by making life miserable for anyone who happens to have the money to buy their own home in a suburban area.
Far-left activists on one hand proclaim that “housing is a right,” while at the same time making it clear that “housing” doesn’t mean one’s own home — but rather a government-owned space you have no control over.
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to C... (
show quote)
This whole idea is ludicrous, inane, insane and just plain Stupid. May just as well force people to eat insects.
no propaganda please wrote:
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to Combat “C*****e C****e”
Progressives who want to combat “c*****e c****e” aren’t just proposing increased government control over people’s eating and travel habits. Now, they want to target home ownership.
In a recent op-ed printed by far-left magazine The Nation, UCLA Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Kian Goh states that people need to “seriously question the ideal of private home ownership” due to the need to “keep cities safe in the face of c*****e c****e”.
The assistant professor goes on to assert that the world only has twelve years to contain g****l w*****g, and that people who think that living in a single-family home in a suburban area is a good idea need to rethink their ideas of success, comfort, and home.
The op-ed would be laughable if it isn’t for the fact that there are plenty of far-left activists who actually believe any of it is based on actual facts. However, it follows the same logic that Democratic lawmakers are acting on.
In Virginia, new legislation currently being considered by the state legislature would essentially end single-family-only zoning, allowing duplexes to be built on any plot of land. While the bill is being pitched by some supporters as a way to end “segregation”, others are stating that it is an environmentally-friendly bill that would allow for extra housing to be built near public t***sport facilities.
Naturally, the wishes of homeowners who would lose green areas of land and peaceful, quiet, safe neighborhoods aren’t actually important. Neither are the concerns of those who want to own their own house on their own tract of land because such desires are apparently not “eco-friendly” in today’s woke world.
In fact, Kian Goh goes further than any state legislature has in the past, advocating for a wide range of government-controlled housing options that no one in their right mind would find attractive. The assistant professor advocates for rental housing, but on the absurd condition that it would be “de-linked from wealth creation.” In other words, landlords can buy houses and rent them out as long as they don’t make money from doing so.
Scientists: A "Salt" works better than top drug for diabetes
Public housing is yet another option presented to the masses, without regard for the fact that government involvement in private business never turns out well for average individuals. This ideal is currently being backed by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who recently proposed a “Housing for All Act” that would require the U.S. government to spend a whopping $1 trillion on public housing.
Cooperative housing is yet another option to pick from, because being forced to live with random people is just great in a world where people are being increasingly conditions to look out for “microaggressions.”
Home ownership used to be a widely-accepted idea as sensible people on both sides of the aisle understood the importance of having a place to call home. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Progressives are eager to “level the playing field” by making life miserable for anyone who happens to have the money to buy their own home in a suburban area.
Far-left activists on one hand proclaim that “housing is a right,” while at the same time making it clear that “housing” doesn’t mean one’s own home — but rather a government-owned space you have no control over.
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to C... (
show quote)
Very interesting there NPP but does the left realize that no one actually owns all of these houses and that the state is the actual owner of said property as it is. We all pay rent to the state for our homes as it is and that rent ins in the form of property taxes. If one who "owns a home" forgets or can't afford their property taxes for one year guess what happens to your home? The state kicks you out of the home and takes over possession and you are out in the cold. I believe that every state in the union has property taxes so then very state owns all of the property. That means their are fifty property owners in the United States as it is.
Lonewolf wrote:
I would truly be embarrassed to let anyone know I believe even one sentence you posted
yet you believe president Trump to be a Russian asset.....and you don't feel embarrassed about that????
Good Grief Man!!
no propaganda please wrote:
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to Combat “C*****e C****e”
Progressives who want to combat “c*****e c****e” aren’t just proposing increased government control over people’s eating and travel habits. Now, they want to target home ownership.
In a recent op-ed printed by far-left magazine The Nation, UCLA Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Kian Goh states that people need to “seriously question the ideal of private home ownership” due to the need to “keep cities safe in the face of c*****e c****e”.
The assistant professor goes on to assert that the world only has twelve years to contain g****l w*****g, and that people who think that living in a single-family home in a suburban area is a good idea need to rethink their ideas of success, comfort, and home.
The op-ed would be laughable if it isn’t for the fact that there are plenty of far-left activists who actually believe any of it is based on actual facts. However, it follows the same logic that Democratic lawmakers are acting on.
In Virginia, new legislation currently being considered by the state legislature would essentially end single-family-only zoning, allowing duplexes to be built on any plot of land. While the bill is being pitched by some supporters as a way to end “segregation”, others are stating that it is an environmentally-friendly bill that would allow for extra housing to be built near public t***sport facilities.
Naturally, the wishes of homeowners who would lose green areas of land and peaceful, quiet, safe neighborhoods aren’t actually important. Neither are the concerns of those who want to own their own house on their own tract of land because such desires are apparently not “eco-friendly” in today’s woke world.
In fact, Kian Goh goes further than any state legislature has in the past, advocating for a wide range of government-controlled housing options that no one in their right mind would find attractive. The assistant professor advocates for rental housing, but on the absurd condition that it would be “de-linked from wealth creation.” In other words, landlords can buy houses and rent them out as long as they don’t make money from doing so.
Scientists: A "Salt" works better than top drug for diabetes
Public housing is yet another option presented to the masses, without regard for the fact that government involvement in private business never turns out well for average individuals. This ideal is currently being backed by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who recently proposed a “Housing for All Act” that would require the U.S. government to spend a whopping $1 trillion on public housing.
Cooperative housing is yet another option to pick from, because being forced to live with random people is just great in a world where people are being increasingly conditions to look out for “microaggressions.”
Home ownership used to be a widely-accepted idea as sensible people on both sides of the aisle understood the importance of having a place to call home. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Progressives are eager to “level the playing field” by making life miserable for anyone who happens to have the money to buy their own home in a suburban area.
Far-left activists on one hand proclaim that “housing is a right,” while at the same time making it clear that “housing” doesn’t mean one’s own home — but rather a government-owned space you have no control over.
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to C... (
show quote)
The Democrats have for years been for banning ownership of any real estate. Same with cars, they don't like us to be mobile at all. Like the N**i's they want you to have to get papers saying where you are going. Yes, they want to know who you are and where you are going. Do to see all the camera's on I-95 around DC? It's like cancer, slowly growing and spreading so slow you never notice.
no propaganda please wrote:
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to Combat “C*****e C****e”
Progressives who want to combat “c*****e c****e” aren’t just proposing increased government control over people’s eating and travel habits. Now, they want to target home ownership.
In a recent op-ed printed by far-left magazine The Nation, UCLA Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Kian Goh states that people need to “seriously question the ideal of private home ownership” due to the need to “keep cities safe in the face of c*****e c****e”.
The assistant professor goes on to assert that the world only has twelve years to contain g****l w*****g, and that people who think that living in a single-family home in a suburban area is a good idea need to rethink their ideas of success, comfort, and home.
The op-ed would be laughable if it isn’t for the fact that there are plenty of far-left activists who actually believe any of it is based on actual facts. However, it follows the same logic that Democratic lawmakers are acting on.
In Virginia, new legislation currently being considered by the state legislature would essentially end single-family-only zoning, allowing duplexes to be built on any plot of land. While the bill is being pitched by some supporters as a way to end “segregation”, others are stating that it is an environmentally-friendly bill that would allow for extra housing to be built near public t***sport facilities.
Naturally, the wishes of homeowners who would lose green areas of land and peaceful, quiet, safe neighborhoods aren’t actually important. Neither are the concerns of those who want to own their own house on their own tract of land because such desires are apparently not “eco-friendly” in today’s woke world.
In fact, Kian Goh goes further than any state legislature has in the past, advocating for a wide range of government-controlled housing options that no one in their right mind would find attractive. The assistant professor advocates for rental housing, but on the absurd condition that it would be “de-linked from wealth creation.” In other words, landlords can buy houses and rent them out as long as they don’t make money from doing so.
Scientists: A "Salt" works better than top drug for diabetes
Public housing is yet another option presented to the masses, without regard for the fact that government involvement in private business never turns out well for average individuals. This ideal is currently being backed by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who recently proposed a “Housing for All Act” that would require the U.S. government to spend a whopping $1 trillion on public housing.
Cooperative housing is yet another option to pick from, because being forced to live with random people is just great in a world where people are being increasingly conditions to look out for “microaggressions.”
Home ownership used to be a widely-accepted idea as sensible people on both sides of the aisle understood the importance of having a place to call home. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Progressives are eager to “level the playing field” by making life miserable for anyone who happens to have the money to buy their own home in a suburban area.
Far-left activists on one hand proclaim that “housing is a right,” while at the same time making it clear that “housing” doesn’t mean one’s own home — but rather a government-owned space you have no control over.
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to C... (
show quote)
==============
In that case, they must talk to Barrack Obama from Kenya, who just bought mansion worth $15 million few feet away from the water front at Martha's Vineyard. What about Ophra's, Pelosi's Bloomberg's, Biden's, Al Gore's Clinton's, and all those rock solid bodied black football players, all hypocrite people in Hollywood, called the Sodom and Gamorrah, and singers like Michael Jackson, unfortunately now dead, and so many others with mansions.
Omar and AOC must build public housing and let them all live there. Also build public housing on all those democrat cities and states with tons of homeless and violence. Then they could live together for the sake of C*****e C****e. What a wonderful idea of these i***ts.
Radiance3 wrote:
==============
In that case, they must talk to Barrack Obama from Kenya, who just bought mansion worth $15 million few feet away from the water front at Martha's Vineyard. What about Ophra's, Pelosi's Bloomberg's, Biden's, Al Gore's Clinton's, and all those rock solid bodied black football players, all hypocrite people in Hollywood, called the Sodom and Gamorrah, and singers like Michael Jackson, unfortunately now dead, and so many others with mansions.
Omar and AOC must build public housing and let them all live there. Also build public housing on all those democrat cities and states with tons of homeless and violence. Then they could live together for the sake of C*****e C****e. What a wonderful idea of these i***ts.
============== br In that case, they must talk to ... (
show quote)
As I recall, Obama now has three million dollar or more houses in three different areas. Not bad for a professional socialist activist, is it?
no propaganda please wrote:
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to Combat “C*****e C****e”
Progressives who want to combat “c*****e c****e” aren’t just proposing increased government control over people’s eating and travel habits. Now, they want to target home ownership.
In a recent op-ed printed by far-left magazine The Nation, UCLA Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Kian Goh states that people need to “seriously question the ideal of private home ownership” due to the need to “keep cities safe in the face of c*****e c****e”.
The assistant professor goes on to assert that the world only has twelve years to contain g****l w*****g, and that people who think that living in a single-family home in a suburban area is a good idea need to rethink their ideas of success, comfort, and home.
The op-ed would be laughable if it isn’t for the fact that there are plenty of far-left activists who actually believe any of it is based on actual facts. However, it follows the same logic that Democratic lawmakers are acting on.
In Virginia, new legislation currently being considered by the state legislature would essentially end single-family-only zoning, allowing duplexes to be built on any plot of land. While the bill is being pitched by some supporters as a way to end “segregation”, others are stating that it is an environmentally-friendly bill that would allow for extra housing to be built near public t***sport facilities.
Naturally, the wishes of homeowners who would lose green areas of land and peaceful, quiet, safe neighborhoods aren’t actually important. Neither are the concerns of those who want to own their own house on their own tract of land because such desires are apparently not “eco-friendly” in today’s woke world.
In fact, Kian Goh goes further than any state legislature has in the past, advocating for a wide range of government-controlled housing options that no one in their right mind would find attractive. The assistant professor advocates for rental housing, but on the absurd condition that it would be “de-linked from wealth creation.” In other words, landlords can buy houses and rent them out as long as they don’t make money from doing so.
Scientists: A "Salt" works better than top drug for diabetes
Public housing is yet another option presented to the masses, without regard for the fact that government involvement in private business never turns out well for average individuals. This ideal is currently being backed by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who recently proposed a “Housing for All Act” that would require the U.S. government to spend a whopping $1 trillion on public housing.
Cooperative housing is yet another option to pick from, because being forced to live with random people is just great in a world where people are being increasingly conditions to look out for “microaggressions.”
Home ownership used to be a widely-accepted idea as sensible people on both sides of the aisle understood the importance of having a place to call home. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Progressives are eager to “level the playing field” by making life miserable for anyone who happens to have the money to buy their own home in a suburban area.
Far-left activists on one hand proclaim that “housing is a right,” while at the same time making it clear that “housing” doesn’t mean one’s own home — but rather a government-owned space you have no control over.
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to C... (
show quote)
Are you up to date with Agenda 21 now advanced to agenda 2030?
It's been unfolding for a few decades now. In Washington state there where hundreds of sites anyone could camp, fish next to rivers and lakes. All have been road blocked, gated, with no access.
California has been removing land owners off their land and most recently did so with several thousand acres in Northern California.
Oregon State has followed these absurdities.
I can only verify these states having lived and traveled them. The goal has been to push rural living into large cities, even small towns and cities into large cities.
Jack
no propaganda please wrote:
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to Combat “C*****e C****e”
Progressives who want to combat “c*****e c****e” aren’t just proposing increased government control over people’s eating and travel habits. Now, they want to target home ownership.
In a recent op-ed printed by far-left magazine The Nation, UCLA Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Kian Goh states that people need to “seriously question the ideal of private home ownership” due to the need to “keep cities safe in the face of c*****e c****e”.
The assistant professor goes on to assert that the world only has twelve years to contain g****l w*****g, and that people who think that living in a single-family home in a suburban area is a good idea need to rethink their ideas of success, comfort, and home.
The op-ed would be laughable if it isn’t for the fact that there are plenty of far-left activists who actually believe any of it is based on actual facts. However, it follows the same logic that Democratic lawmakers are acting on.
In Virginia, new legislation currently being considered by the state legislature would essentially end single-family-only zoning, allowing duplexes to be built on any plot of land. While the bill is being pitched by some supporters as a way to end “segregation”, others are stating that it is an environmentally-friendly bill that would allow for extra housing to be built near public t***sport facilities.
Naturally, the wishes of homeowners who would lose green areas of land and peaceful, quiet, safe neighborhoods aren’t actually important. Neither are the concerns of those who want to own their own house on their own tract of land because such desires are apparently not “eco-friendly” in today’s woke world.
In fact, Kian Goh goes further than any state legislature has in the past, advocating for a wide range of government-controlled housing options that no one in their right mind would find attractive. The assistant professor advocates for rental housing, but on the absurd condition that it would be “de-linked from wealth creation.” In other words, landlords can buy houses and rent them out as long as they don’t make money from doing so.
Scientists: A "Salt" works better than top drug for diabetes
Public housing is yet another option presented to the masses, without regard for the fact that government involvement in private business never turns out well for average individuals. This ideal is currently being backed by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who recently proposed a “Housing for All Act” that would require the U.S. government to spend a whopping $1 trillion on public housing.
Cooperative housing is yet another option to pick from, because being forced to live with random people is just great in a world where people are being increasingly conditions to look out for “microaggressions.”
Home ownership used to be a widely-accepted idea as sensible people on both sides of the aisle understood the importance of having a place to call home. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Progressives are eager to “level the playing field” by making life miserable for anyone who happens to have the money to buy their own home in a suburban area.
Far-left activists on one hand proclaim that “housing is a right,” while at the same time making it clear that “housing” doesn’t mean one’s own home — but rather a government-owned space you have no control over.
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to C... (
show quote)
Jeeeezzz... If the cow farts don't get us in 12 years, quiet suburban homeowners will.
What this all boils down to, environmental excuses notwithstanding, is the left's need to promote chaos in every nook and cranny of American life.
Just because a family wants to live in a quiet, green, peaceful suburb doesn't give them the right to escape the tentacles of urban misery. They simply won't leave anybody alone, they crave intrusive, authoritarian government that goes home with everybody, hovers over every aspect of their everyday lives, tells them what they can and cannot say, what they can and cannot eat, believe, worship or wear.
It's made obvious in their opposition to charter schools, for example, which provide a better education than public schools but without the requisite left wing political indoctrination.
Forcing "acceptance" of t*********rism on us, trying to legally destroy a Christian baker for refusing to bake a same sex wedding cake...
And to l*****ts, this is all "normal" while those of us who don't agree are evil.
Lonewolf wrote:
I would truly be embarrassed to let anyone know I believe even one sentence you posted
You must run with a crowd of somewhat "interesting" individuals, there, Mr. Lone, given that you would be embarrassed to say anything to them that any sane, normal, freedom loving American would agree with.
no propaganda please wrote:
As I recall, Obama now has three million dollar or more houses in three different areas. Not bad for a professional socialist activist, is it?
=============
Those democrat radicals enter the WH with empty pockets, and after they got out they were all loaded. Aside from the $15 million mansion in Martha's Vineyard, Obama has a mansion in Chicago also now being rented. He bought that few hundred thousands sold to him by Tony Resko Obama's fund raiser, who was jailed for 10 years of corruption.
I think Obama also owns a vacation mansion in Florida.
no propaganda please wrote:
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to Combat “C*****e C****e”
Progressives who want to combat “c*****e c****e” aren’t just proposing increased government control over people’s eating and travel habits. Now, they want to target home ownership.
In a recent op-ed printed by far-left magazine The Nation, UCLA Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Kian Goh states that people need to “seriously question the ideal of private home ownership” due to the need to “keep cities safe in the face of c*****e c****e”.
The assistant professor goes on to assert that the world only has twelve years to contain g****l w*****g, and that people who think that living in a single-family home in a suburban area is a good idea need to rethink their ideas of success, comfort, and home.
The op-ed would be laughable if it isn’t for the fact that there are plenty of far-left activists who actually believe any of it is based on actual facts. However, it follows the same logic that Democratic lawmakers are acting on.
In Virginia, new legislation currently being considered by the state legislature would essentially end single-family-only zoning, allowing duplexes to be built on any plot of land. While the bill is being pitched by some supporters as a way to end “segregation”, others are stating that it is an environmentally-friendly bill that would allow for extra housing to be built near public t***sport facilities.
Naturally, the wishes of homeowners who would lose green areas of land and peaceful, quiet, safe neighborhoods aren’t actually important. Neither are the concerns of those who want to own their own house on their own tract of land because such desires are apparently not “eco-friendly” in today’s woke world.
In fact, Kian Goh goes further than any state legislature has in the past, advocating for a wide range of government-controlled housing options that no one in their right mind would find attractive. The assistant professor advocates for rental housing, but on the absurd condition that it would be “de-linked from wealth creation.” In other words, landlords can buy houses and rent them out as long as they don’t make money from doing so.
Scientists: A "Salt" works better than top drug for diabetes
Public housing is yet another option presented to the masses, without regard for the fact that government involvement in private business never turns out well for average individuals. This ideal is currently being backed by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who recently proposed a “Housing for All Act” that would require the U.S. government to spend a whopping $1 trillion on public housing.
Cooperative housing is yet another option to pick from, because being forced to live with random people is just great in a world where people are being increasingly conditions to look out for “microaggressions.”
Home ownership used to be a widely-accepted idea as sensible people on both sides of the aisle understood the importance of having a place to call home. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Progressives are eager to “level the playing field” by making life miserable for anyone who happens to have the money to buy their own home in a suburban area.
Far-left activists on one hand proclaim that “housing is a right,” while at the same time making it clear that “housing” doesn’t mean one’s own home — but rather a government-owned space you have no control over.
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to C... (
show quote)
Wonder if they couldn’t qualify for a home!
no propaganda please wrote:
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to Combat “C*****e C****e”
Progressives who want to combat “c*****e c****e” aren’t just proposing increased government control over people’s eating and travel habits. Now, they want to target home ownership.
In a recent op-ed printed by far-left magazine The Nation, UCLA Assistant Professor of Urban Planning Kian Goh states that people need to “seriously question the ideal of private home ownership” due to the need to “keep cities safe in the face of c*****e c****e”.
The assistant professor goes on to assert that the world only has twelve years to contain g****l w*****g, and that people who think that living in a single-family home in a suburban area is a good idea need to rethink their ideas of success, comfort, and home.
The op-ed would be laughable if it isn’t for the fact that there are plenty of far-left activists who actually believe any of it is based on actual facts. However, it follows the same logic that Democratic lawmakers are acting on.
In Virginia, new legislation currently being considered by the state legislature would essentially end single-family-only zoning, allowing duplexes to be built on any plot of land. While the bill is being pitched by some supporters as a way to end “segregation”, others are stating that it is an environmentally-friendly bill that would allow for extra housing to be built near public t***sport facilities.
Naturally, the wishes of homeowners who would lose green areas of land and peaceful, quiet, safe neighborhoods aren’t actually important. Neither are the concerns of those who want to own their own house on their own tract of land because such desires are apparently not “eco-friendly” in today’s woke world.
In fact, Kian Goh goes further than any state legislature has in the past, advocating for a wide range of government-controlled housing options that no one in their right mind would find attractive. The assistant professor advocates for rental housing, but on the absurd condition that it would be “de-linked from wealth creation.” In other words, landlords can buy houses and rent them out as long as they don’t make money from doing so.
Scientists: A "Salt" works better than top drug for diabetes
Public housing is yet another option presented to the masses, without regard for the fact that government involvement in private business never turns out well for average individuals. This ideal is currently being backed by Rep. Ilhan Omar, who recently proposed a “Housing for All Act” that would require the U.S. government to spend a whopping $1 trillion on public housing.
Cooperative housing is yet another option to pick from, because being forced to live with random people is just great in a world where people are being increasingly conditions to look out for “microaggressions.”
Home ownership used to be a widely-accepted idea as sensible people on both sides of the aisle understood the importance of having a place to call home. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Progressives are eager to “level the playing field” by making life miserable for anyone who happens to have the money to buy their own home in a suburban area.
Far-left activists on one hand proclaim that “housing is a right,” while at the same time making it clear that “housing” doesn’t mean one’s own home — but rather a government-owned space you have no control over.
Far Left Activist Wants to Ban Home Ownership to C... (
show quote)
well my home is very efficient there public housing would not do as good as my home!!!! for the furnace to get this house up 1 degree the gas runs 4 minutes then 2 more to blow the hot air out of the furnace .. then it takes a 1/2 hour to lose a degree ..before i did what i did it would lose a degree in a minute or 2 ..i bet my house will do better than the far left !!!!!!!!they are getting to far !!!!!!!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
