One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Is Boris Johnson's Massive Victory a Foreshadowing of November 2020???
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Dec 14, 2019 13:24:12   #
fullspinzoo
 
rjoeholl wrote:
Is English not your native tongue or do you write in ebonics?


He's not well educated. And that's putting it as politely as I can. And then on top of them he thinks he's well versed on just every topic known to mankind....when he doesn't know s**t about shinola.

Reply
Dec 14, 2019 14:26:05   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
He's not well educated. And that's putting it as politely as I can. And then on top of them he thinks he's well versed on just every topic known to mankind....when he doesn't know s**t about shinola.

I'd bet that, like most our age, the man knows the expression is "not knowing sh*t FROM Shinola."

John 8:7, KJV---"But when they continued asking him, he looked up and said to them, 'He who is without sin among you, let him throw the first stone at her(him),' and when they continued asking him, having bent himself back, he said unto them, 'The sinless of you -- let him first cast the stone at her(him).' "

Reply
Dec 14, 2019 14:45:50   #
fullspinzoo
 
slatten49 wrote:
I'd bet that, like most our age, the man knows the expression is "not knowing sh*t FROM Shinola."

John 8:7, KJV---"But when they continued asking him, he looked up and said to them, 'He who is without sin among you, let him throw the first stone at her(him),' and when they continued asking him, having bent himself back, he said unto them, 'The sinless of you -- let him first cast the stone at her(him).' "
I'd bet that, like most our age, the man knows the... (show quote)


"All sinners", I've said that many times on this very platform. All the more to give Trump a "cnsure" rather than something that everyone knows is way, way, way, beyond wh**ever "sin" this guy has 'possibly' committed. thanks for bringing up the scripture. didn't know you were the type.

Reply
 
 
Dec 14, 2019 14:58:48   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
"All sinners", I've said that many times on this very platform. All the more to give Trump a "cnsure" rather than something that everyone knows is way, way, way, beyond wh**ever "sin" this guy has 'possibly' committed. thanks for bringing up the scripture. didn't know you were the type.

Well, your post was deserving of all the same criticisms you imposed upon LoneWolf…thus, my posting of appropriate Scripture.

There are few, if any of us on OPP, who are perfect in our writing and/or grammatical sk**ls...or, presumed knowledge. If those who had said shortcomings were eliminated from OPP, posters might well be scarce as hen's teeth. Many write seemingly without knowing sh*t from Shinola.

I am far from being a scholar, but I have used Biblical Scripture numerous times.

Reply
Dec 14, 2019 15:19:39   #
fullspinzoo
 
slatten49 wrote:
Well, your post was deserving of all the same criticisms you imposed upon LoneWolf…thus, my posting of appropriate Scripture.

There are few, if any of us on OPP, who are perfect in our writing and/or grammatical sk**ls...or, presumed knowledge. If those who had said shortcomings were eliminated from OPP, posters might well be scarce as hen's teeth. Many write seemingly without knowing sh*t from Shinola.

I am far from being a scholar, but I have used Biblical Scripture numerous times.
Well, your post was deserving of all the same crit... (show quote)


IMHO, I don't think Christian teachings are the Left's forte. Many social issues don't convert over to Dems' average platform. A******n, gay rights, open borders, just some of the issues that the 82% of the evangelicals found not to be in their wheel house of things they were looking for in a candidate. (And I think the number of Christians v****g for this will be even higher because of "promises made, promises kept"). Last time it was "Oh, well I'll take a chance. can't do any worse than what we had the last 8 years. this year they have an excellent record to run on. Lonely calls me a "d-cklicker" and still supports the hell out of the L***Q community. Trdsnest called me a c**ksucker and again the same support. Just i***ts who can't argue and make sense. "Wares' the lye", (lonewolf) tells me this guy is "NOT TOO BRIGHT therefore I'm not going to give him any credibility. the things he says are just DUMB. Has the right to look like an i***t which is more than your buddy Kevyn gives Judge Jeanine and he says, "she should shut her pie hole". Must I remind you, you guys have NO respect for "people's other viewpoints". that's why you promote beating on 14 year old kids who wear red MAGA hats. (Have you watched the video yet?) You guys are the epitome of CLASS!!!! Pathetic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Dec 14, 2019 15:27:43   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
IMHO, I don't think Christian teachings are the Left's forte. Many social issues don't convert over to Dems' average platform. A******n, gay rights, open borders, just some of the issues that the 82% of the evangelicals found not to be in their wheel house of things they were looking for in a candidate. (And I think the number of Christians v****g for this will be even higher because of "promises made, promises kept"). Last time it was "Oh, well I'll take a chance. can't do any worse than what we had the last 8 years. this year they have an excellent record to run on.
IMHO, I don't think Christian teachings are the Le... (show quote)

I recognize and accept that you have ample reason to be humble.

Reply
Dec 14, 2019 15:43:22   #
fullspinzoo
 
slatten49 wrote:
I recognize and accept that you have ample reason to be humble.


I love my President and what he is doing for the American people (when he could be on the beach in the Bahamas sipping on a virgin Pina Colada with his beautiful wife.) rather than being reduced to putting up with such bulls**t. Two articles of impeachment that are so pitiful, so worthless, so deplorable (now there's a good word) it should be embarrassing for some on the Left. I said to somebody, "they really set the bar very low. He shot back with "there is no bar". How you can quote scripture and then be such a part or approve of such a charade. To me it just doesn't jive. Not judging per se, just sayin'.

Reply
 
 
Dec 14, 2019 15:55:18   #
fullspinzoo
 
slatten49 wrote:
Well, your post was deserving of all the same criticisms you imposed upon LoneWolf…thus, my posting of appropriate Scripture.

There are few, if any of us on OPP, who are perfect in our writing and/or grammatical sk**ls...or, presumed knowledge. If those who had said shortcomings were eliminated from OPP, posters might well be scarce as hen's teeth. Many write seemingly without knowing sh*t from Shinola.

I am far from being a scholar, but I have used Biblical Scripture numerous times.
Well, your post was deserving of all the same crit... (show quote)


Not true. If you can't spell the word "where" you have no credibility and your presumptions crystal ball assumptions based on nothing ~ Trump will resign, Trump will be removed for treason.. If you act like a complete moron and then tell me Pelosi is going to be president before the next e******n, I'm going take your PRESUMPTION with a grain of salt, or better yet, go out on a limb and say your a whacko. Hence,my perception of Lonewolf, he has the right to say any and all whacked out opinions all he wants and I will ignore him for the next year. Unfortunately my "ignore list" is out of whack more than Loonytune.

Reply
Dec 14, 2019 16:05:51   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
Not true. If you can't spell the word "where" you have no credibility and your presumptions crystal ball assumptions based on nothing ~ Trump will resign, Trump will be removed for treason.. If you act like a complete moron and then tell me Pelosi is going to be president before the next e******n, I'm going take your PRESUMPTION with a grain of salt, or better yet, go out on a limb and say your a whacko. Hence,my perception of Lonewolf, he has the right to say any and all whacked out opinions all he wants and I will ignore him for the next year. Unfortunately my "ignore list" is out of whack more than Loonytune.
Not true. If you can't spell the word "where... (show quote)

The word was 'were", Zoo, not 'where'. "If those who had said shortcomings WERE eliminated from OPP, posters might well be scarce as hen's teeth."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Were; VERB, second person singular past, plural past, and past subjunctive of be.

What is the correct use of was and were?

Forms of Was and Were. As I said above, was and were are in the past tense, but they are used differently. Was is used in the first person singular (I) and the third person singular (he, she, it). Were is used in the second person singular and plural (you, your, yours) and first and third person plural (we, they, those).

Reply
Dec 14, 2019 16:18:54   #
fullspinzoo
 
slatten49 wrote:
The word is "were," Zoo, not 'where.' "If those who had said shortcomings 'were' eliminated …"

Were; VERB, second person singular past, plural past, and past subjunctive of be.

What is the correct use of was and were?

Forms of Was and Were. As I said above, was and were are in the past tense, but they are used differently. Was is used in the first person singular (I) and the third person singular (he, she, it). Were is used in the second person singular and plural (you, your, yours) and first and third person plural (we, they).
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)


I know all that s**t. He was trying to spell "where and he put down ware". wh**ever. He's an i***t and half the people on OPP recognize it last comment directed to him "Get a life". I don't want to listen to Loonytune tell me how Trump is going to resign, be removed for treason, be assassinated, or how he is servicing Putin. (For reals) I know you don't believe me but my time is more worthwhile than listening to this bulls**t artist. GFYourselves all of you. Try sticking up for someone who is really worth it. If he was a dumbass conservative you wouldn't give a s**t.

Reply
Dec 14, 2019 16:30:27   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
I know all that s**t. He was trying to spell "where and he put down ware". wh**ever. He's an i***t and half the people on OPP recognize it last comment directed to him "Get a life". I don't want to listen to Loonytune tell me how Trump is going to resign, be removed for treason, be assassinated, or how he is servicing Putin. (For reals) I know you don't believe me but my time is more worthwhile than listening to this bulls**t artist. GFYourselves all of you. Try sticking up for someone who is really worth it. If he was a dumbass conservative you wouldn't give a s**t.
I know all that s**t. He was trying to spell "... (show quote)

I consider fellow Marines with service-connected disabilities worth the time and effort to correct those who aren't qualified to cast the first stone at them or anyone else. Besides, L-W and others are constantly barraged by your steady, zombie-like comments of blind allegiance to Trump. You are eaten up with TDS...


Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a satirical psychological diagnosis used to explain the hysterical reaction and belligerent behavior of people, PRO or CON, generally directed towards anything related to President Donald Trump as pertaining to his presidency. It isn't intended to be a logical argument, rather a jab at another individual's excessive emotional reactions as well as aggressive physical displays. It is an ad hominem argument, not a strawman argument as suggested by definition...and, there are numerous variations on TDS, all of which have their own particular partisan/ideological twist.

TDS was originally a made-up condition, conceived as an insult label by the alt-right to attack anyone who criticizes or refuses to support Donald Trump. The idea being the left is so obsessed with Trump they have collectively lost their minds. Like many of their other little online crusades, this one has backfired. People dislike Trump for actual reasons which often go well beyond just politics or partisanship, and if anyone has Trump Derangement Syndrome it's those on the right that blindly support him. They have lost their sense of morality, religious convictions, principles, objectivity, all discernment, and even the ability to have a civil discussion or reason. So the term has now been co-opted by others to refer to Trump supporters who are blinded by their unrealistic devotion to Trump.

The origin of the term 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is traced to political columnist and conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer, a psychiatrist, who originally coined the phrase 'Bush derangement syndrome' in 2003 during the presidency of George W. Bush. That syndrome was defined by Krauthammer as "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency – nay – the very existence of George W. Bush." The first use of the term 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' may have been by Esther Goldberg in an August 2015 op-ed in The American Spectator; She applied the term to "Ruling Class Republicans" who are dismissive or contemptuous of Trump. Krauthammer, himself a harsh critic of Trump, later defined "Trump derangement syndrome" as a Trump-induced "general hysteria" among the chattering classes, producing an "inability to distinguish between legitimate policy differences and ... signs of psychic pathology" in the President's behavior.

P.S. You've no idea of how many OPP friends who happen to be conservatives that I admire and defend.

Reply
 
 
Dec 14, 2019 16:45:09   #
fullspinzoo
 
slatten49 wrote:
I consider Marines with service-connected disabilities worth the time and effort to correct those who aren't qualified to "cast the first stone" at them or anyone else. Besides, L-W and others are constantly barraged by your steady, zombie-like comments of blind allegiance to Trump. You are eaten up with TDS...

Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a satirical psychological diagnosis used to explain the hysterical reaction and belligerent behavior of people, PRO or CON, generally directed towards anything related to President Donald Trump as pertaining to his presidency. It isn't intended to be a logical argument, rather a jab at another individual's excessive emotional reactions as well as aggressive physical displays. It is an ad hominem argument, not a strawman argument as suggested by definition...and, there are numerous variations on TDS, all of which have their own particular partisan/ideological twist.

TDS was originally a made-up condition, conceived as an insult label by the alt-right to attack anyone who criticizes or refuses to support Donald Trump. The idea being the left is so obsessed with Trump they have collectively lost their minds. Like many of their other little online crusades, this one has backfired. People dislike Trump for actual reasons which often go well beyond just politics or partisanship, and if anyone has Trump Derangement Syndrome it's those on the right that blindly support him. They have lost their sense of morality, religious convictions, principles, objectivity, all discernment, and even the ability to have a civil discussion or reason. So the term has now been co-opted by others to refer to Trump supporters who are blinded by their unrealistic devotion to Trump.

The origin of the term 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is traced to political columnist and conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer, a psychiatrist, who originally coined the phrase 'Bush derangement syndrome' in 2003 during the presidency of George W. Bush. That syndrome was defined by Krauthammer as "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency – nay – the very existence of George W. Bush." The first use of the term 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' may have been by Esther Goldberg in an August 2015 op-ed in The American Spectator; She applied the term to "Ruling Class Republicans" who are dismissive or contemptuous of Trump. Krauthammer, himself a harsh critic of Trump, later defined "Trump derangement syndrome" as a Trump-induced "general hysteria" among the chattering classes, producing an "inability to distinguish between legitimate policy differences and ... signs of psychic pathology" in the President's behavior.

P.S. You have no idea of how many of my OPP friends who happen to be conservatives that I've defended.
I consider Marines with service-connected disabili... (show quote)


Stopped reading after the first paragraph. BTW, this Commander-in-Chief treats his military 50 times better than Obama every dreamed of. I'm quite surprised that some of you haven't picked up on that. I'm sure it' an insult of some sort and don't care.

Reply
Dec 14, 2019 16:49:28   #
fullspinzoo
 
slatten49 wrote:
I consider fellow Marines with service-connected disabilities worth the time and effort to correct those who aren't qualified to cast the first stone at them or anyone else. Besides, L-W and others are constantly barraged by your steady, zombie-like comments of blind allegiance to Trump. You are eaten up with TDS...


Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a satirical psychological diagnosis used to explain the hysterical reaction and belligerent behavior of people, PRO or CON, generally directed towards anything related to President Donald Trump as pertaining to his presidency. It isn't intended to be a logical argument, rather a jab at another individual's excessive emotional reactions as well as aggressive physical displays. It is an ad hominem argument, not a strawman argument as suggested by definition...and, there are numerous variations on TDS, all of which have their own particular partisan/ideological twist.

TDS was originally a made-up condition, conceived as an insult label by the alt-right to attack anyone who criticizes or refuses to support Donald Trump. The idea being the left is so obsessed with Trump they have collectively lost their minds. Like many of their other little online crusades, this one has backfired. People dislike Trump for actual reasons which often go well beyond just politics or partisanship, and if anyone has Trump Derangement Syndrome it's those on the right that blindly support him. They have lost their sense of morality, religious convictions, principles, objectivity, all discernment, and even the ability to have a civil discussion or reason. So the term has now been co-opted by others to refer to Trump supporters who are blinded by their unrealistic devotion to Trump.

The origin of the term 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is traced to political columnist and conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer, a psychiatrist, who originally coined the phrase 'Bush derangement syndrome' in 2003 during the presidency of George W. Bush. That syndrome was defined by Krauthammer as "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency – nay – the very existence of George W. Bush." The first use of the term 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' may have been by Esther Goldberg in an August 2015 op-ed in The American Spectator; She applied the term to "Ruling Class Republicans" who are dismissive or contemptuous of Trump. Krauthammer, himself a harsh critic of Trump, later defined "Trump derangement syndrome" as a Trump-induced "general hysteria" among the chattering classes, producing an "inability to distinguish between legitimate policy differences and ... signs of psychic pathology" in the President's behavior.

P.S. You've no idea of how many OPP friends who happen to be conservatives that I admire and defend.
I consider fellow Marines with service-connected d... (show quote)


I doubt it an again, could care less. You ARE one mixed-up soul.

Reply
Dec 14, 2019 16:53:44   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
I doubt it an again, could care less. You ARE one mixed-up soul.

You, Zoo, are deemed soul-less.

Reply
Dec 14, 2019 16:56:41   #
fullspinzoo
 
slatten49 wrote:
I consider fellow Marines with service-connected disabilities worth the time and effort to correct those who aren't qualified to cast the first stone at them or anyone else. Besides, L-W and others are constantly barraged by your steady, zombie-like comments of blind allegiance to Trump. You are eaten up with TDS...


Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a satirical psychological diagnosis used to explain the hysterical reaction and belligerent behavior of people, PRO or CON, generally directed towards anything related to President Donald Trump as pertaining to his presidency. It isn't intended to be a logical argument, rather a jab at another individual's excessive emotional reactions as well as aggressive physical displays. It is an ad hominem argument, not a strawman argument as suggested by definition...and, there are numerous variations on TDS, all of which have their own particular partisan/ideological twist.

TDS was originally a made-up condition, conceived as an insult label by the alt-right to attack anyone who criticizes or refuses to support Donald Trump. The idea being the left is so obsessed with Trump they have collectively lost their minds. Like many of their other little online crusades, this one has backfired. People dislike Trump for actual reasons which often go well beyond just politics or partisanship, and if anyone has Trump Derangement Syndrome it's those on the right that blindly support him. They have lost their sense of morality, religious convictions, principles, objectivity, all discernment, and even the ability to have a civil discussion or reason. So the term has now been co-opted by others to refer to Trump supporters who are blinded by their unrealistic devotion to Trump.

The origin of the term 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is traced to political columnist and conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer, a psychiatrist, who originally coined the phrase 'Bush derangement syndrome' in 2003 during the presidency of George W. Bush. That syndrome was defined by Krauthammer as "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency – nay – the very existence of George W. Bush." The first use of the term 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' may have been by Esther Goldberg in an August 2015 op-ed in The American Spectator; She applied the term to "Ruling Class Republicans" who are dismissive or contemptuous of Trump. Krauthammer, himself a harsh critic of Trump, later defined "Trump derangement syndrome" as a Trump-induced "general hysteria" among the chattering classes, producing an "inability to distinguish between legitimate policy differences and ... signs of psychic pathology" in the President's behavior.

P.S. You've no idea of how many OPP friends who happen to be conservatives that I admire and defend.
I consider fellow Marines with service-connected d... (show quote)


you have the nerve to insinuate that the Left, the Progs take or deserve the moral high ground. How dare you? Be careful or you will turn into a bigger hypocrite than Hillary Clinton, or church going Nancy. I understand it would take a lot of work, but it looks like you're on the right track.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.