One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
What’s the Matter With Republicans?
Page <<first <prev 8 of 39 next> last>>
Dec 15, 2019 09:12:18   #
Cuda2020
 
byronglimish wrote:
Ok..just for that, no toys!


Well, I see you definitely getting some coal, but its all good it'll help heat your house and produce some more CO2

Reply
Dec 15, 2019 09:14:35   #
Cuda2020
 
American Vet wrote:
The only disservice the AG is doing is not proceeding full bore to get these swamp creatures brought to justice (starting with hillary and Comey). And, from what is now coming to light, the corrupt ex-President appears to be part of the mix.


Let's finish with the present corrupt president, and then we can walk backward in step with the right.

Reply
Dec 15, 2019 09:25:06   #
Cuda2020
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
And foreign policy, the president is well within his rights to conduct any foreign policy he desires, pro or no quid.
These kommiecrats are t*****rs committing a c**p and calling it legal. And most of Washington DC supports that, including the Republicans.
Pisses me off.


No most of DC does not support it, your just in your own echo chamber once again. The Republicans along with this treasonous president are the t*****rs if they, one, do not validate a trial to get to all testimonies, with NONE be blocked by the president, and two, to have selected the most neutral party jurors to judge over it without any bias from either side and that most certainly doesn't include the very prejudicial MacConnell or anyone who cannot judge fairly with just the facts of the testimonies.

Reply
Dec 15, 2019 09:35:20   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
And foreign policy, the president is well within his rights to conduct any foreign policy he desires, pro or no quid.
These kommiecrats are t*****rs committing a c**p and calling it legal. And most of Washington DC supports that, including the Republicans.
Pisses me off.


Michigan newbie demoprog Slotkin said she is going to evaluate the real evidence for and against impeachment.

Claimed she is a bipartisan v**e on to impeach or not to.

This "former CIA spook" could be doing a pied piper routine.

Reply
Dec 15, 2019 10:45:25   #
Mikeyavelli
 
byronglimish wrote:
Michigan newbie demoprog Slotkin said she is going to evaluate the real evidence for and against impeachment.

Claimed she is a bipartisan v**e on to impeach or not to.

This "former CIA spook" could be doing a pied piper routine.


I don't trust anyone in Washington DC.
Trump and maybe 4 others, that is all. Everyone else is Bullnadler.

Reply
Dec 15, 2019 10:45:44   #
debeda
 
American Vet wrote:
The only disservice the AG is doing is not proceeding full bore to get these swamp creatures brought to justice (starting with hillary and Comey). And, from what is now coming to light, the corrupt ex-President appears to be part of the mix.



Reply
Dec 15, 2019 10:56:23   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
I don't trust anyone in Washington DC.
Trump and maybe 4 others, that is all. Everyone else is Bullnadler.


It's a sad note brother Mikey.

Reply
Dec 15, 2019 11:05:45   #
American Vet
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Let's finish with the present corrupt president, and then we can walk backward in step with the right.


Present corrupt President? No collusion, no bribery, no 'quid pro quo'. So far all the liberals have is "orange man bad.....he beat hillary".

Reply
Dec 15, 2019 11:24:13   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
American Vet wrote:
Present corrupt President? No collusion, no bribery, no 'quid pro quo'. So far all the liberals have is "orange man bad.....he beat hillary".


I am curious, do Democrats really believe that the Ukraine is faster and more proficient in concluding investigations than our own FBI? It took Mueller two years to conclude....it is 2019, e******ns are less than a year away.... the Ukraine would need to work 24/7 to deliver any usable dirt in a year and even then the dirt would not be in time to use it in a ree******n campaign. I guess, Democrats expect the Ukraine to dev**e all their resources toward the "investigation." BS... excuse my language.



Reply
Dec 15, 2019 11:33:44   #
debeda
 
American Vet wrote:
Present corrupt President? No collusion, no bribery, no 'quid pro quo'. So far all the liberals have is "orange man bad.....he beat hillary".



Reply
Dec 15, 2019 11:35:26   #
debeda
 
Pennylynn wrote:
I am curious, do Democrats really believe that the Ukraine is faster and more proficient in concluding investigations than our own FBI? It took Mueller two years to conclude....it is 2019, e******ns are less than a year away.... the Ukraine would need to work 24/7 to deliver any usable dirt in a year and even then the dirt would not be in time to use it in a ree******n campaign. I guess, Democrats expect the Ukraine to dev**e all their resources toward the "investigation." BS... excuse my language.
I am curious, do Democrats really believe that the... (show quote)


Well of course. Because the Democrats are so self important they believe the entire world breathlessly awaits their every gesture and utterance

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2019 12:19:50   #
hdjimv Loc: South Dakota
 

Reply
Dec 15, 2019 18:20:11   #
Saspatz007 Loc: The goat sheds
 
Pennylynn wrote:
What world do you live in? A person can not be exonerated if they are not investigated or tried. Choosing to ignore his antics is not proclaiming him innocent. H****r was/is not president, but his parent was the VP and an envoy to the Ukraine and his quid pro quo was wrong. Even H****r confessed the only reason he was employed by Burisma, who in 217 still had two open investigations in the Ukraine.


Sigh...

Plutocrats are running both parties.

Of course the politicians on both sides end up with big bucks from their power and influence. This is not new.

As I say repeatedly;
No innocent parties.

Reply
Dec 15, 2019 18:21:17   #
Saspatz007 Loc: The goat sheds
 
byronglimish wrote:
If you had intellectual honesty. You would be appalled in the way you people are running the c*******t impeachment charade.


C*******t? In what way?

Reply
Dec 15, 2019 18:25:00   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Saspatz007 wrote:
C*******t? In what way?


In style and form.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 39 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.