Seth wrote:
You mean pointing out an extreme act of monetary corruption based quid pro quo is "deflection" because Biden's another Democrat, therefore, even though he confessed to his quid pro quo on national television, he is exempt from the rules that apply to Republicans.
Got it.
He was using military aid that was not his to withhold for his own purposes, Biden had nothing to do with national security interests, only trump's political interests.
karpenter wrote:
Nope
She Would Be President
However
I Shudder To Think About What That Would Have Been
Four more years of Obama stability, the horror
woodguru wrote:
He was using military aid that was not his to withhold for his own purposes, Biden had nothing to do with national security interests, only trump's political interests.
Sure, Biden was threatening to withhold the $3 billion for the purpose of pure corruption. This was
our tax money he was using to blackmail a foreign leader, and he was doing so under the authority of the White House.
And somehow you believe this was just a mere bagatelle?
He even bragged about it on television, saying that the prosecutor would be replaced by someone "more solid."
I don't know how much you get out, Mr. Wood, but in politics when someone says "more solid" he means someone who will do as he's told, above board or not, to do according to a political party's needs.
A well used term in corruption circles.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.