One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Dictatorial overtures: WH refusing Constitutionally legal subpoenas
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
Oct 26, 2019 11:14:09   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Singularity wrote:
What is applicable is that your awful deity is ok with, dictates the process for and lends an affirmative magical boost to make a******ns work if there is something about the conception of that pregnancy that pricks a husband's ego.

If the purported father's peace of mind regarding his sexual prowess and ability to properly satisfy his wife sexually is uneasy, a fetus can be sacrificed over his ambiguous claim of paternity.

If the god was ok with THAT as a reason to abort, I'd say the mother's peace of mind about having the baby counts as significantly.

The LAWS may change over time, yes. But the GOD and its revealed moral t***h is supposed to be the same yesterday, today and forever, right?

So the GOD is morally ok with a******n to ease a parent's troubled mind about its possible parentage. Its just inconvenient to recall that now that some of the other rules have changed.

Also,

Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17
What is applicable is that your awful deity is ok ... (show quote)


Roll another one. The flowery diatribe is beyond what's necessary to convey a clear and coherent delivery. Have a nice day

p.s....when you folks of the atheist religion quote a book that you've already denounced as fairytales.

It makes your speech accusatory and disingenuousa..no offense..good job of you being you though.

Reply
Oct 26, 2019 12:52:18   #
Singularity
 
byronglimish wrote:
Roll another one. The flowery diatribe is beyond what's necessary to convey a clear and coherent delivery. Have a nice day

p.s....when you folks of the atheist religion quote a book that you've already denounced as fairytales.

It makes your speech accusatory and disingenuousa..no offense..good job of you being you though.

Yes, I am accusing the religious tropes being trotted out here as disingenuous at least. I feel "dishonest," "hypocritical" and "abusive" are also applicable charges.

No offense.

Now that I am familiar with you and your reflexive flailings, I recall that this is the complaint you habitually make when I'm right and you don't have any way to assail the facts or logic.

Thanks for the affirmation.

Live long and prosper, bro.

Reply
Oct 26, 2019 13:01:15   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Singularity wrote:
Yes, I am accusing the religious tropes being trotted out here as disingenuous at least. I feel "dishonest," "hypocritical" and "abusive" are also applicable charges.

No offense.

Now that I am familiar with you and your reflexive flailings, I recall that this is the complaint you habitually make when I'm right and you don't have any way to assail the facts or logic.

Thanks for the affirmation.

Live long and prosper, bro.



I'm sorry ma'am, it's all just limited to your opinion.

But your 1st Amendment right, allows,..just that.

Be well and linger long, nice lady.

Reply
 
 
Oct 26, 2019 14:22:59   #
Singularity
 
byronglimish wrote:
I'm sorry ma'am, it's all just limited to your opinion.

But your 1st Amendment right, allows,..just that.

Be well and linger long, nice lady.

Reply
Oct 26, 2019 14:23:57   #
Singularity
 
So mote it be, you crustaceous critter.

Reply
Oct 26, 2019 14:29:41   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Singularity wrote:
So mote it be, you crustaceous critter.


Not a bottom feeder, too many Demoproggie Socialists have proven it to be detrimental to even the most educated entwined there.

Reply
Nov 2, 2019 21:48:52   #
at41
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Where in the constitution does it say the House of Representatives has complete power and oversight over the Executive branch of government.


It says in the Constitution that the House of Representatives has the total say in matters of impeachment

Reply
 
 
Nov 3, 2019 15:38:45   #
rumitoid
 
at41 wrote:
It says in the Constitution that the House of Representatives has the total say in matters of impeachment


End of story!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.