nwtk2007 wrote:
It's an issue.
The l*****t/Democrat/Trump h**er - "We stay. Trump's abandoning the Kurds. A decision based upon nothing but politics and h**e for Trump.
The Republicans - Two ways of looking at it; We shouldn't leave or we should or maybe, there's more to this than meets the eye. Bottom line, for the Republicans, it's policy debate between opposing thinking, not a knee jerk "I h**e Trump" reaction like the left.
My big question: How is the move of 50 military personnel a total of 25 miles going to bring on Armageddon??
Trump made a fair point: Not all Kurds are the same and not all of them are good, loyal patriotic, pro-Americans. He pointed to an article about some of the history of the Kurds back into past wars. They didn't chime into those wars helping us. They have only helped us when they had something of value to gain. In this case, their homes/land/where they live at present.
Here's the point. It's not a slam dunk sort of policy decision which is easily made. And it's not something you decide on based upon politics and h**e for the president. Our guys are in danger and some will die as they have been now for 20 some odd years in Afghanistan and they region. If I were Trump, I'd get tired of having to explain it to the family's of the service men who died, as to why it was necessary for them to die. Soldiers die, true enough, but are they nothing but pawns to be played and lost??
They say our guys just being there would stop Turkey from attacking the area. Really? How many of you guys want to go over there and essentially be human shields between the Kurds and Turkey, and test that theory?????
It's an issue. br br The l*****t/Democrat/Trump h... (
show quote)
————————————-
Trump made the following comment in a Breitbart News interview in December 2015 during his p**********l campaign when asked how he would handle Turkey and Syria.
“I have a little conflict of interest ’cause I have a major, major building in Istanbul,” Trump boasted in response. “It’s a tremendously successful job. It’s called Trump Towers — two towers, instead of one, not the usual one; it’s two. And I’ve gotten to know Turkey very well. They’re amazing people, they’re incredible people. They have a strong leader.”
He said then that the situation was “complicated,” adding, “I thrive on complicated.” Trump did not reveal what he would do in the region if he were to become commander in chief.
Trump still profits from Trump Towers in Istanbul, and the “strong leader” then was the same as now: President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Though his continuing business interest in Istanbul is widely known, his own admission that it represents a conflict of interest is startling. Critics have long argued that Trump, as presidents traditionally do, should divest from his businesses to avoid conflicts of interest that threaten to put his personal benefit ahead of the nation’s.
In a late Sunday phone call with Erdogan, Trump suddenly agreed to let Turkey occupy a strip of northern Syria, currently controlled by ethnic Kurds who have been America’s most effective allies in battling the so-called Islamic State. Now supporters fear a U.S.-enabled slaughter of the Kurds, who have a centuries-long dispute with Turkey over self-rule.
“Everyone was absolutely flabbergasted by this,” retired Adm. James Stavridis said Monday on MSNBC, referring to the Pentagon perspective on Trump’s action. “Nobody saw it coming, and that is a real problem when you’re trying to conduct not only foreign policy ... but also military operations. That kind of whipsawing effect is extremely detrimental, not only in this tactical situation but strategically, as our planners try and prepare in other theaters, from North Korea to Afghanistan.”
From HuffPost
10-07-2019
So, now do you understand why Trump threw the Kurds under the bus? It was to protect his, personal, investment in Turkey’s capital, least something very, very bad happen to it. actually, he doesn’t own the 2 towers. He allowed his name to be licensed on the towers. As such, he gets a bunch of money off of them.