Would impeachment lead to civil war?
Oct 19, 2019 17:55:36 #
Oct 19, 2019 18:24:09 #
Singularity wrote:
no worries.
I'm adjusting conversational flow to better syncronize my responses anyway.
And I gotta start driving in a few more minutes.....
Unless my sons testosterone poisoning leads him to insist upon driving us home from his root canal.
I'm adjusting conversational flow to better syncronize my responses anyway.
And I gotta start driving in a few more minutes.....
Unless my sons testosterone poisoning leads him to insist upon driving us home from his root canal.
Lolololhahahaha
Oct 19, 2019 18:24:55 #
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Most always use my phone for OPP. Quicker.
Yep. Except when it comes to looking stuff up.....
Oct 19, 2019 18:42:48 #
debeda wrote:
Yhe judicial committee ejected Republican members of the committee. Look up Jim Jordan's interview upon being ejected.
I believe one person was kicked out because he was not part of the committee investigating.
Oct 19, 2019 18:56:14 #
moldyoldy wrote:
I believe one person was kicked out because he was not part of the committee investigating.
==============
Jim Jordan and Matt Gaetz were booted out. These are members of the Justice Committee, the two most brilliant members of the minority party.
Oct 19, 2019 19:41:13 #
moldyoldy wrote:
I believe one person was kicked out because he was not part of the committee investigating.
Matt Gaetz, claims he was confused and thought he should be there, but as he was NOT a member of the committee. People looked at him funny and told him, no, he could not attend. He protested, so people kinda looked at their hands as he blubbered and whined that he really, really, really wanted to stay, anyway. The Parlamentarian explained the concept of classified closed briefings open to vetted members on a need to know basis to him.
Either the explanation was not clear or was unacceptable or this is another example of his self admitted love for trying to trigger democrats.
I remember seeing him in hearings. Emotional fluff piece. Professional gadfly. Good at it. Could imagine he would entertain Trump. No interesting pertinent issue recollections, tho.
https://images.app.goo.gl/gigJvoTLjkTAMt7J8
Oct 19, 2019 19:43:45 #
Oct 19, 2019 19:51:26 #
Singularity wrote:
Matt Gaetz, claims he was confused and thought he ... (show quote)
More charitably, I have seen the explanation that confusion was created as impeachment was mentioned informally by Nadler after the Mueller thing wrapped up and six or so different committees the mix of which included those two, had been formed to investigate various different areas of concern regarding irregularities in the Trump campaign or Administration.
Once Nancy Pelosi announced the commencement of a formal inquiry regarding impeachment the structure seemed to be reshuffled among three committees, under Adam Schiff, which subsequently apparently did not include Jefferies and Gaetz. It may be entirely possible that they were legitimately confused.
Oct 19, 2019 19:59:36 #
Radiance3 wrote:
==============
Jim Jordan and Matt Gaetz were booted out. These are members of the Justice Committee, the two most brilliant members of the minority party.
Jim Jordan and Matt Gaetz were booted out. These are members of the Justice Committee, the two most brilliant members of the minority party.
Jim Jordan is the kid at school everyone's mother makes them invite to their birthday parties in elementary school and the primary reason most middle school guys refuse to have birthday parties.
Clever in a paranoid mind set more than intelligent, the most brilliant thing about Gaetz is his teeth.
Oct 19, 2019 20:18:34 #
Oct 19, 2019 20:20:02 #
Singularity wrote:
Matt Gaetz, claims he was confused and thought he ... (show quote)
Another Nunes and Jordan.
Oct 19, 2019 20:39:54 #
moldyoldy wrote:
Another Nunes and Jordan.
===============
These Judicial members of the minority were prevented from challenging the facts of the grounds for impeachment. It was decided only by Schitt and Pelosi in secret.
Oct 19, 2019 20:53:49 #
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
These Judicial members of the minority were prevented from challenging the facts of the grounds for impeachment. It was decided only by Schitt and Pelosi in secret.
These Judicial members of the minority were prevented from challenging the facts of the grounds for impeachment. It was decided only by Schitt and Pelosi in secret.
Which is completely expected. The chance to challenge evidence is at trial in the Senate.
As you said, the House "fully controls" the process of producing and v****g on impeachment articles, and a Democratic majority controls the House. I think I've had it explained to me to have relevance to the fact that "E******ns have consequences."
Proffered advice, "Get over it."
I'm betting some people switch to opposite sides of this opinion fence, if this process results in a Senate trial.
Oct 19, 2019 21:11:41 #
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
These Judicial members of the minority were prevented from challenging the facts of the grounds for impeachment. It was decided only by Schitt and Pelosi in secret.
These Judicial members of the minority were prevented from challenging the facts of the grounds for impeachment. It was decided only by Schitt and Pelosi in secret.
Nothing has been decided
Oct 19, 2019 22:55:40 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.