One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Democrats have clearly demonstrated that they are not fit to govern.
Page <prev 2 of 2
Sep 26, 2019 17:33:00   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
woodguru wrote:
Put even more accurately, republicans and the GOP are the enemy of democracy, they see nothing wrong with their minority telling the majority what to do.


Is then not your party is doing for the last 3 years? YES, it is. Are you blind and dumb?

Reply
Sep 26, 2019 17:49:58   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
byronglimish wrote:
Put simply..the left are enemies of our Republic.



Reply
Sep 26, 2019 18:19:43   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
MR Mister wrote:
Is then not your party is doing for the last 3 years? YES, it is. Are you blind and dumb?


Can you give him some time to figure which it is.?

Reply
 
 
Sep 27, 2019 04:09:33   #
Auntie Lulu
 
MR Mister wrote:
Since gaining control of the U.S. House, Democrats have clearly demonstrated that they are not fit to govern. While one might have assumed that gaining a bit of power would have caused them to behave more responsibly, that has not been the case at all. When Congressional Democrats are not busy ignoring the nation’s problems or scheming to overturn the result of the 2016 p**********l e******n, they are pushing radical legislation that shows how just out-of-touch they are. Case in point, Democrats are supporting the Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019 forced unionization bill or PRO Act, which would empower and enrich union bosses while disempowering workers and k*****g jobs.

Here are a few of the PRO Act’s destructive provisions:

The legislation would essentially overturn Right to Work laws in more than two dozen states and force private-sector workers to pay fees to a union – even if they adamantly oppose the union – just to keep their jobs.
It would force employers to hand over workers’ contact information, including home addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses. Workers would have no choice in the matter, and union organizers could use this information to harass workers until they agreed to sign a union card.
It would expand the definition of employee to include more independent contractors thereby disrupting the gig economy and endangering jobs.
It would make national franchising companies, such as McDonald’s or Holiday Inn, responsible for the actions of employees of individual franchisees. This would disrupt the franchise industry and endanger more jobs as franchising companies sought to minimize their potential liability.
It would require that unionization e******ns occur quickly. By minimizing the amount of time that employers have to make their case against unionization – and the amount of time that undecided workers would have to make up their minds – unions gain an unfair advantage.
It would also impose harsher penalties on employers who violate the National Labor Relations Act while leaving the current penalties in place for unions who violate the same law.

Democrat support for the PRO Act is overwhelming. There are now 208 Democrat cosponsors of the House version of the bill, H.R. 2474. What that means is that over 87 percent of the House Democrat caucus supports the PRO Act. House cosponsors include House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, current p**********l candidates Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) and Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), former p**********l candidates Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) and Seth Moulton (D-MA), and over half of the supposedly centrist Blue Dog Caucus. There are now 40 liberal Senate cosponsors: 39 Democrat and one Independent. In other words, over 87 percent of the liberal Senate caucus (which includes two Independents) supports this bill. Senate cosponsors include Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), current p**********l candidates Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and former p**********l candidate Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.).

The good news is that not one single Republican supports the disastrous PRO Act and that it will not be enacted this year or next; the bad news is that it could pass as soon as 2021 if the e******ns go poorly next year. Regardless of whether the legislation ever passes, the PRO Act shows that the Democrat Party has grown radical, and v**ers and donors need to accept this fact. In particular, investors and business people need to recognize that these policies are bad for the economy. So even if they are liberal socially, they are v****g or donating against their own interests when they choose to support them.
Since gaining control of the U.S. House, Democrats... (show quote)


Wow! This sounds like a very disastrous, and ill conceived piece of legislation. No one has the right to hand over your personal information i.e. address, phone number, email address to anyone else, for any purpose. This is once again just a "C*******t" scheme, plain and simply.

Reply
Sep 27, 2019 11:11:34   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
badbob85037 wrote:
Nothing new with the democrat potty since LBJ k**led JFK.



Reply
Oct 3, 2019 20:33:58   #
rebob14
 
MR Mister wrote:
Since gaining control of the U.S. House, Democrats have clearly demonstrated that they are not fit to govern. While one might have assumed that gaining a bit of power would have caused them to behave more responsibly, that has not been the case at all. When Congressional Democrats are not busy ignoring the nation’s problems or scheming to overturn the result of the 2016 p**********l e******n, they are pushing radical legislation that shows how just out-of-touch they are. Case in point, Democrats are supporting the Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019 forced unionization bill or PRO Act, which would empower and enrich union bosses while disempowering workers and k*****g jobs.

Here are a few of the PRO Act’s destructive provisions:

The legislation would essentially overturn Right to Work laws in more than two dozen states and force private-sector workers to pay fees to a union – even if they adamantly oppose the union – just to keep their jobs.
It would force employers to hand over workers’ contact information, including home addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses. Workers would have no choice in the matter, and union organizers could use this information to harass workers until they agreed to sign a union card.
It would expand the definition of employee to include more independent contractors thereby disrupting the gig economy and endangering jobs.
It would make national franchising companies, such as McDonald’s or Holiday Inn, responsible for the actions of employees of individual franchisees. This would disrupt the franchise industry and endanger more jobs as franchising companies sought to minimize their potential liability.
It would require that unionization e******ns occur quickly. By minimizing the amount of time that employers have to make their case against unionization – and the amount of time that undecided workers would have to make up their minds – unions gain an unfair advantage.
It would also impose harsher penalties on employers who violate the National Labor Relations Act while leaving the current penalties in place for unions who violate the same law.

Democrat support for the PRO Act is overwhelming. There are now 208 Democrat cosponsors of the House version of the bill, H.R. 2474. What that means is that over 87 percent of the House Democrat caucus supports the PRO Act. House cosponsors include House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, current p**********l candidates Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) and Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), former p**********l candidates Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) and Seth Moulton (D-MA), and over half of the supposedly centrist Blue Dog Caucus. There are now 40 liberal Senate cosponsors: 39 Democrat and one Independent. In other words, over 87 percent of the liberal Senate caucus (which includes two Independents) supports this bill. Senate cosponsors include Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), current p**********l candidates Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and former p**********l candidate Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.).

The good news is that not one single Republican supports the disastrous PRO Act and that it will not be enacted this year or next; the bad news is that it could pass as soon as 2021 if the e******ns go poorly next year. Regardless of whether the legislation ever passes, the PRO Act shows that the Democrat Party has grown radical, and v**ers and donors need to accept this fact. In particular, investors and business people need to recognize that these policies are bad for the economy. So even if they are liberal socially, they are v****g or donating against their own interests when they choose to support them.
Since gaining control of the U.S. House, Democrats... (show quote)


No humans are fit to govern..........that’s the entire purpose of limited government and enumerated federal powers. Of course, if that government destroys the educational infrastructure and dumbs every one down, then nobody even notices what’s happened and governing becomes just another exercise in pop culture popularity!

Reply
Oct 4, 2019 11:20:26   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
rebob14 wrote:
No humans are fit to govern..........that’s the entire purpose of limited government and enumerated federal powers. Of course, if that government destroys the educational infrastructure and dumbs every one down, then nobody even notices what’s happened and governing becomes just another exercise in pop culture popularity!


I think you may have something there.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.