Democrats have clearly demonstrated that they are not fit to govern: Since gaining control of the U.S. House, Democrats have clearly demonstrated that they are not fit to govern. While...

MR Mister Loc: Washington DC

Since gaining control of the U.S. House, Democrats have clearly demonstrated that they are not fit to govern. While one might have assumed that gaining a bit of power would have caused them to behave more responsibly, that has not been the case at all. When Congressional Democrats are not busy ignoring the nation’s problems or scheming to overturn the result of the 2016 p**********l e******n, they are pushing radical legislation that shows how just out-of-touch they are. Case in point, Democrats are supporting the Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019 forced unionization bill or PRO Act, which would empower and enrich union bosses while disempowering workers and k*****g jobs.

Here are a few of the PRO Act’s destructive provisions:

The legislation would essentially overturn Right to Work laws in more than two dozen states and force private-sector workers to pay fees to a union – even if they adamantly oppose the union – just to keep their jobs.
It would force employers to hand over workers’ contact information, including home addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses. Workers would have no choice in the matter, and union organizers could use this information to harass workers until they agreed to sign a union card.
It would expand the definition of employee to include more independent contractors thereby disrupting the gig economy and endangering jobs.
It would make national franchising companies, such as McDonald’s or Holiday Inn, responsible for the actions of employees of individual franchisees. This would disrupt the franchise industry and endanger more jobs as franchising companies sought to minimize their potential liability.
It would require that unionization e******ns occur quickly. By minimizing the amount of time that employers have to make their case against unionization – and the amount of time that undecided workers would have to make up their minds – unions gain an unfair advantage.
It would also impose harsher penalties on employers who violate the National Labor Relations Act while leaving the current penalties in place for unions who violate the same law.

Democrat support for the PRO Act is overwhelming. There are now 208 Democrat cosponsors of the House version of the bill, H.R. 2474. What that means is that over 87 percent of the House Democrat caucus supports the PRO Act. House cosponsors include House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, current p**********l candidates Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) and Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), former p**********l candidates Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) and Seth Moulton (D-MA), and over half of the supposedly centrist Blue Dog Caucus. There are now 40 liberal Senate cosponsors: 39 Democrat and one Independent. In other words, over 87 percent of the liberal Senate caucus (which includes two Independents) supports this bill. Senate cosponsors include Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), current p**********l candidates Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and former p**********l candidate Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.).

The good news is that not one single Republican supports the disastrous PRO Act and that it will not be enacted this year or next; the bad news is that it could pass as soon as 2021 if the e******ns go poorly next year. Regardless of whether the legislation ever passes, the PRO Act shows that the Democrat Party has grown radical, and v**ers and donors need to accept this fact. In particular, investors and business people need to recognize that these policies are bad for the economy. So even if they are liberal socially, they are v****g or donating against their own interests when they choose to support them.

Liberty Tree

MR Mister wrote:

Since gaining control of the U.S. House, Democrats have clearly demonstrated that they are not fit to govern. While one might have assumed that gaining a bit of power would have caused them to behave more responsibly, that has not been the case at all. When Congressional Democrats are not busy ignoring the nation’s problems or scheming to overturn the result of the 2016 p**********l e******n, they are pushing radical legislation that shows how just out-of-touch they are. Case in point, Democrats are supporting the Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019 forced unionization bill or PRO Act, which would empower and enrich union bosses while disempowering workers and k*****g jobs.

Here are a few of the PRO Act’s destructive provisions:

The legislation would essentially overturn Right to Work laws in more than two dozen states and force private-sector workers to pay fees to a union – even if they adamantly oppose the union – just to keep their jobs.
It would force employers to hand over workers’ contact information, including home addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses. Workers would have no choice in the matter, and union organizers could use this information to harass workers until they agreed to sign a union card.
It would expand the definition of employee to include more independent contractors thereby disrupting the gig economy and endangering jobs.
It would make national franchising companies, such as McDonald’s or Holiday Inn, responsible for the actions of employees of individual franchisees. This would disrupt the franchise industry and endanger more jobs as franchising companies sought to minimize their potential liability.
It would require that unionization e******ns occur quickly. By minimizing the amount of time that employers have to make their case against unionization – and the amount of time that undecided workers would have to make up their minds – unions gain an unfair advantage.
It would also impose harsher penalties on employers who violate the National Labor Relations Act while leaving the current penalties in place for unions who violate the same law.

Democrat support for the PRO Act is overwhelming. There are now 208 Democrat cosponsors of the House version of the bill, H.R. 2474. What that means is that over 87 percent of the House Democrat caucus supports the PRO Act. House cosponsors include House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, current p**********l candidates Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) and Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), former p**********l candidates Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) and Seth Moulton (D-MA), and over half of the supposedly centrist Blue Dog Caucus. There are now 40 liberal Senate cosponsors: 39 Democrat and one Independent. In other words, over 87 percent of the liberal Senate caucus (which includes two Independents) supports this bill. Senate cosponsors include Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), current p**********l candidates Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and former p**********l candidate Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.).

The good news is that not one single Republican supports the disastrous PRO Act and that it will not be enacted this year or next; the bad news is that it could pass as soon as 2021 if the e******ns go poorly next year. Regardless of whether the legislation ever passes, the PRO Act shows that the Democrat Party has grown radical, and v**ers and donors need to accept this fact. In particular, investors and business people need to recognize that these policies are bad for the economy. So even if they are liberal socially, they are v****g or donating against their own interests when they choose to support them.

Since gaining control of the U.S. House, Democrats... (show quote)

Not just unfit but dangerous.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Liberty Tree wrote:

Not just unfit but dangerous.

Put simply..the left are enemies of our Republic.

woodguru

Trump showed he was unfit from the start when Flynn called the Russian ambassador and told him that sanctions were as good as lifted...remember that?

woodguru

byronglimish wrote:

Put simply..the left are enemies of our Republic.

Put even more accurately, republicans and the GOP are the enemy of democracy, they see nothing wrong with their minority telling the majority what to do.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

woodguru wrote:

Put even more accurately, republicans and the GOP are the enemy of democracy, they see nothing wrong with their minority telling the majority what to do.

You people keep telling lies.

We the people will tell the t***h.

When all of your mishandling of t***h has run its course, then you people will move on to civil war, against We the People.

That's where your i*****l a***ns are supposed to jump in and help you people.

Unlike in the e******ns, you people will not be able to utilize the dead for your anarchy.

bahmer

MR Mister wrote:

Since gaining control of the U.S. House, Democrats have clearly demonstrated that they are not fit to govern. While one might have assumed that gaining a bit of power would have caused them to behave more responsibly, that has not been the case at all. When Congressional Democrats are not busy ignoring the nation’s problems or scheming to overturn the result of the 2016 p**********l e******n, they are pushing radical legislation that shows how just out-of-touch they are. Case in point, Democrats are supporting the Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019 forced unionization bill or PRO Act, which would empower and enrich union bosses while disempowering workers and k*****g jobs.

Here are a few of the PRO Act’s destructive provisions:

The legislation would essentially overturn Right to Work laws in more than two dozen states and force private-sector workers to pay fees to a union – even if they adamantly oppose the union – just to keep their jobs.
It would force employers to hand over workers’ contact information, including home addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses. Workers would have no choice in the matter, and union organizers could use this information to harass workers until they agreed to sign a union card.
It would expand the definition of employee to include more independent contractors thereby disrupting the gig economy and endangering jobs.
It would make national franchising companies, such as McDonald’s or Holiday Inn, responsible for the actions of employees of individual franchisees. This would disrupt the franchise industry and endanger more jobs as franchising companies sought to minimize their potential liability.
It would require that unionization e******ns occur quickly. By minimizing the amount of time that employers have to make their case against unionization – and the amount of time that undecided workers would have to make up their minds – unions gain an unfair advantage.
It would also impose harsher penalties on employers who violate the National Labor Relations Act while leaving the current penalties in place for unions who violate the same law.

Democrat support for the PRO Act is overwhelming. There are now 208 Democrat cosponsors of the House version of the bill, H.R. 2474. What that means is that over 87 percent of the House Democrat caucus supports the PRO Act. House cosponsors include House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, current p**********l candidates Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) and Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), former p**********l candidates Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) and Seth Moulton (D-MA), and over half of the supposedly centrist Blue Dog Caucus. There are now 40 liberal Senate cosponsors: 39 Democrat and one Independent. In other words, over 87 percent of the liberal Senate caucus (which includes two Independents) supports this bill. Senate cosponsors include Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), current p**********l candidates Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and former p**********l candidate Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.).

The good news is that not one single Republican supports the disastrous PRO Act and that it will not be enacted this year or next; the bad news is that it could pass as soon as 2021 if the e******ns go poorly next year. Regardless of whether the legislation ever passes, the PRO Act shows that the Democrat Party has grown radical, and v**ers and donors need to accept this fact. In particular, investors and business people need to recognize that these policies are bad for the economy. So even if they are liberal socially, they are v****g or donating against their own interests when they choose to support them.

Since gaining control of the U.S. House, Democrats... (show quote)

The left has become the enemy and they are pushing for another Civil War it would seem.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

woodguru wrote:

Trump showed he was unfit from the start when Flynn called the Russian ambassador and told him that sanctions were as good as lifted...remember that?

Where did you get THAT lie?

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

nwtk2007 wrote:

Where did you get THAT lie?

He might be thinking of when Obama was caught on a hot mic sending promises to Putin.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

byronglimish wrote:

He might be thinking of when Obama was caught on a hot mic sending promises to Putin.

I think you're right!

ImLogicallyRight

MR Mister wrote:

Since gaining control of the U.S. House, Democrats have clearly demonstrated that they are not fit to govern. While one might have assumed that gaining a bit of power would have caused them to behave more responsibly, that has not been the case at all. When Congressional Democrats are not busy ignoring the nation’s problems or scheming to overturn the result of the 2016 p**********l e******n, they are pushing radical legislation that shows how just out-of-touch they are. Case in point, Democrats are supporting the Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019 forced unionization bill or PRO Act, which would empower and enrich union bosses while disempowering workers and k*****g jobs.

Here are a few of the PRO Act’s destructive provisions:

The legislation would essentially overturn Right to Work laws in more than two dozen states and force private-sector workers to pay fees to a union – even if they adamantly oppose the union – just to keep their jobs.
It would force employers to hand over workers’ contact information, including home addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses. Workers would have no choice in the matter, and union organizers could use this information to harass workers until they agreed to sign a union card.
It would expand the definition of employee to include more independent contractors thereby disrupting the gig economy and endangering jobs.
It would make national franchising companies, such as McDonald’s or Holiday Inn, responsible for the actions of employees of individual franchisees. This would disrupt the franchise industry and endanger more jobs as franchising companies sought to minimize their potential liability.
It would require that unionization e******ns occur quickly. By minimizing the amount of time that employers have to make their case against unionization – and the amount of time that undecided workers would have to make up their minds – unions gain an unfair advantage.
It would also impose harsher penalties on employers who violate the National Labor Relations Act while leaving the current penalties in place for unions who violate the same law.

Democrat support for the PRO Act is overwhelming. There are now 208 Democrat cosponsors of the House version of the bill, H.R. 2474. What that means is that over 87 percent of the House Democrat caucus supports the PRO Act. House cosponsors include House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, current p**********l candidates Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) and Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), former p**********l candidates Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) and Seth Moulton (D-MA), and over half of the supposedly centrist Blue Dog Caucus. There are now 40 liberal Senate cosponsors: 39 Democrat and one Independent. In other words, over 87 percent of the liberal Senate caucus (which includes two Independents) supports this bill. Senate cosponsors include Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), current p**********l candidates Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and former p**********l candidate Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.).

The good news is that not one single Republican supports the disastrous PRO Act and that it will not be enacted this year or next; the bad news is that it could pass as soon as 2021 if the e******ns go poorly next year. Regardless of whether the legislation ever passes, the PRO Act shows that the Democrat Party has grown radical, and v**ers and donors need to accept this fact. In particular, investors and business people need to recognize that these policies are bad for the economy. So even if they are liberal socially, they are v****g or donating against their own interests when they choose to support them.

Since gaining control of the U.S. House, Democrats... (show quote)

This is just one more example of how bad for America the democrats are. If they get in control of the presidency, especially with most of those jackasses that are running in their primary, they will force America into becoming a socialist/c*******t state heading full blast towards Venezuela. They are to be feared for their obvious urge for absolute power as demonstrated by their total intolerance of any thought besides theirs. Fight them with all we've got because it won't matter if c*****e c****e is real, they will ens***e you, your kids and your grandkids while they live in luxury. And the brainwashing media and teachers in America will do everything possible to block any ideas or thoughts in opposition.

ImLogicallyRight

MR Mister Loc: Washington DC

woodguru wrote:

Trump showed he was unfit from the start when Flynn called the Russian ambassador and told him that sanctions were as good as lifted...remember that?

So, are they lifted? NO, THEY ARE NOT.
JERK.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

MR Mister wrote:

So, are they lifted? NO, THEY ARE NOT.
JERK.

The President has been fairly rough on Russia.

The l*****ts aren't allowed to speak of that fact.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

MR Mister wrote:

So, are they lifted? NO, THEY ARE NOT.
JERK.

There is nothing in the record where Flynn told Russia that sanctions would be lifted. Flynn admitted to lying about having conversations with the Russian ambassador, not the content of the conversations.

badbob85037

Nothing new with the democrat potty since LBJ k**led JFK.