One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Danger to the US circled with a Sharpie.
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Sep 8, 2019 12:31:19   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Rose42 wrote:
I feel sorry for Biden. IMO he's not a bad guy and I don't like the way people are attacking him. I agree its old for the office. Look at pictures of Obama and how he aged in 8 years. It takes a huge toll on anyone.

I still have hope that a good candidate will step forward. One that will put us first. Its a dim hope but its still there.

Sadly...again, I agree.

Reply
Sep 8, 2019 13:56:14   #
Lonewolf
 
emarine wrote:
Trump was tweeting week old info on a storm updated hourly …this isn't about h**e... there is no excuse for incompetence …


in·com·pe·tence
/inˈkämpədəns/
noun
noun: incompetence; plural noun: incompetences
inability to do something successfully; ineptitude.
"allegations of professional incompetence"
synonyms:
ineptitude, ineptness, inability, lack of ability, incapability, incapacity, lack of sk**l, lack of proficiency, amateurishness, inexpertness, clumsiness, ineffectiveness, inadequacy, deficiency, inefficiency, ineffectuality, ineffectualness, insufficiency; More
informalcack-handedness, ham-fistedness, uselessness, hopelessness
"allegations of professional incompetence"
antonyms:
competence, prowess
Trump was tweeting week old info on a storm update... (show quote)



Reply
Sep 9, 2019 06:55:58   #
billy a Loc: South Florida
 
slatten49 wrote:
Why are meteorologists around the USA upset now that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has declared that Alabama was indeed in danger from Hurricane Dorian? Who's right? The NWS, NOAA, or the person who ordered the NOAA to say so?

An opinion with which I agree....

"The timeline and evidence are clear. The NWS was right, as are the understandably outraged meteorologists.

Everyone should be outraged that a service which warns citizens about life-threatening e*****e w*****r events has had its credibility undermined not only by the President, but by the politically motivated non-meteorologist management of the NOAA.

The briefing given to Trump had no indication that Alabama was remotely at risk. There was a very low potential in the days before the briefing that a tiny slice of Alabama might be impacted, but that wasn’t included in Trump’s briefing. At no point would Trump have been told Alabama was at risk.

Trump made a mistake in his tweet. He was wrong. Unsurprising.

The NWS has a duty and it carried it out. It tweeted immediately that Alabama was not at any risk and pointed out which states were. That’s its job, to be accurate.

Trump doubled down on his mistake, as he always does. Facts are irrelevant to him. Especially compared to his ego.

The NOAA management tweet statement throwing the NWS under the bus was damaging to the credibility of a safety-critical, empirically oriented, science-based organization. That’s just wrong on multiple levels.
Trump and the NOAA management are in the wrong. The NWS was/is in the right."
Why are meteorologists around the USA upset now th... (show quote)


I'm responding to your post,Slat,out of respect for your realistic view of this issue...as opposed to the lead .
I live in South Florida,have been through several hurricanes,including Andrew.Citizens,authorities,Leo's take these "Cones of Death" as a general guide...only a fool would take them as Gospel. Hurricanes break all rules of logic,science and history.
Dorian hit. It's gone. Deal with the aftermath...send a couple bucks to the Red Cross. Pray. Please stop this childish arguing about the damn cone. Look at the Bahamas.
Really LOOK.

Reply
 
 
Sep 9, 2019 07:17:31   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
billy a wrote:
I'm responding to your post,Slat,out of respect for your realistic view of this issue...as opposed to the lead .
I live in South Florida,have been through several hurricanes,including Andrew.Citizens,authorities,Leo's take these "Cones of Death" as a general guide...only a fool would take them as Gospel. Hurricanes break all rules of logic,science and history.
Dorian hit. It's gone. Deal with the aftermath...send a couple bucks to the Red Cross. Pray. Please stop this childish arguing about the damn cone. Look at the Bahamas.
Really LOOK.
I'm responding to your post,Slat,out of respect fo... (show quote)

Well said, Billy A...and, thank you.

Reply
Sep 9, 2019 11:48:53   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
PeterS wrote:
yup...


You are a product of inbreeding! Or bestiality!!!

Reply
Sep 9, 2019 12:16:01   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
slatten49 wrote:
Why are meteorologists around the USA upset now that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has declared that Alabama was indeed in danger from Hurricane Dorian? Who's right? The NWS, NOAA, or the person who ordered the NOAA to say so?

An opinion with which I agree....

"The timeline and evidence are clear. The NWS was right, as are the understandably outraged meteorologists.

Everyone should be outraged that a service which warns citizens about life-threatening e*****e w*****r events has had its credibility undermined not only by the President, but by the politically motivated non-meteorologist management of the NOAA.

The briefing given to Trump had no indication that Alabama was remotely at risk. There was a very low potential in the days before the briefing that a tiny slice of Alabama might be impacted, but that wasn’t included in Trump’s briefing. At no point would Trump have been told Alabama was at risk.

Trump made a mistake in his tweet. He was wrong. Unsurprising.

The NWS has a duty and it carried it out. It tweeted immediately that Alabama was not at any risk and pointed out which states were. That’s its job, to be accurate.

Trump doubled down on his mistake, as he always does. Facts are irrelevant to him. Especially compared to his ego.

The NOAA management tweet statement throwing the NWS under the bus was damaging to the credibility of a safety-critical, empirically oriented, science-based organization. That’s just wrong on multiple levels.
Trump and the NOAA management are in the wrong. The NWS was/is in the right."
Why are meteorologists around the USA upset now th... (show quote)


Why insist on this ridiculous, tired out subject?
The original map included Alabama.
Beating a dead horse.

Reply
Sep 9, 2019 12:24:54   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
America 1 wrote:
Why insist on this ridiculous, tired out subject?
The original map included Alabama.
Beating a dead horse.

If you had read the entire post, you would realize that Alabama was included in the earliest forecasts. The president simply gave outdated info.

Reply
 
 
Sep 9, 2019 14:59:22   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
PeterS wrote:
yup...


With that forecast by the weather bureau, it seemed a logical point of destruction. But those on the left, that h**e trump, show no logic when it is about what Trump has said.

Reply
Sep 9, 2019 21:29:47   #
peg w
 
As I said before, Scintific American gave Trump a rating of 0 for his understsnding of science. He just proved they were right.

Reply
Sep 9, 2019 21:30:32   #
peg w
 
As I said before, Scintific American gave Trump a rating of 0 for his understsnding of science. He just proved they were right.

Reply
Sep 9, 2019 23:04:55   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
You may have had more detailed info Slatten but from what I first saw, the storm was predicted to go across Florida's mid-section through Orlando. That would have put it on path to go into the Gulf and then a threat to Alabama would be a logical conclusion.


That's what the first Computer models indicated.

Trump screwed up, and is anyone really surprised? He doubled down because the left viciously thought they had another "gotcha" quill in their cap.

Reply
 
 
Sep 9, 2019 23:53:01   #
emarine
 
dtucker300 wrote:
That's what the first Computer models indicated.

Trump screwed up, and is anyone really surprised? He doubled down because the left viciously thought they had another "gotcha" quill in their cap.




If you had a high profile position & blabbed old info you would be removed … if you doubled down whining you were correct then threatened the experts jobs... you would be trump...

Reply
Sep 10, 2019 00:01:15   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
emarine wrote:
If you had a high profile position & blabbed old info you would be removed … if you doubled down whining you were correct then threatened the experts jobs... you would be trump...


Better than being a socialist/progressive/c*******t/l*****t/f*****t/elitist/statist Democrat.

Reply
Sep 10, 2019 00:20:49   #
emarine
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Better than being a socialist/progressive/c*******t/l*****t/f*****t/elitist/statist Democrat.





Man, glad you got that off your chest ….

Reply
Sep 10, 2019 00:39:11   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
emarine wrote:
Man, glad you got that off your chest ….


You will notice this latest screed was again started by a l*****t. Some just can't let go of their anger that Trump defeated Hillary. They will have their chance in 14 months.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.