In Texas, of all places.
Seth wrote:
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (
show quote)
I forgot the Winston cigarettes.
WTH!!!!! "Retroactive zoning"??????? D********g
rebob14 wrote:
True in Dallas and Austin, at least!
But Dallas is VERY blue......
PeterS wrote:
As with all things in Texas, this is about money. The city of Dallas came after one of my properties and I could only convince them to stop when I showed they would be losing tax revenue in the long run. Like any business or government if it hits them in the pocketbook they won't do it...
The question I have is "without compensation." Who owned the property? I have never heard of anyone having their property ceased--unless it was a drug deal--without any form of compensation.
Also, eminent domain ISN'T illegal in Texas. That's how all road easements are achieved--the illegal part is that they have to compensate you.
I suspect that not everything is being told here or at least not being told factually...
As with all things in Texas, this is about money. ... (
show quote)
I understood it to mean the retroactively rezoned. He may not have owned the property.
Dallas, Houston, and Austin are liberal cities. With the Castro brothers, San Antonio is moving left. They are trying to turn us blue.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.