One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
In Texas, of all places.
Page 1 of 2 next>
Sep 1, 2019 03:53:42   #
Richard Rowland
 
How can this be happening in Texas, or anywhere else for that matter?



https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/court-allows-city-close-mechanics-shop-without-compensation/

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 04:10:02   #
Tug484
 
Richard Rowland wrote:
How can this be happening in Texas, or anywhere else for that matter?



https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/court-allows-city-close-mechanics-shop-without-compensation/


Truly d********g!

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 05:49:06   #
Kevyn
 
Richard Rowland wrote:
How can this be happening in Texas, or anywhere else for that matter?



https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/court-allows-city-close-mechanics-shop-without-compensation/


They practice capitalism in Texas and justice is a commodity, he simply couldn’t afford to buy any.

Reply
 
 
Sep 1, 2019 06:35:58   #
rebob14
 
Kevyn wrote:
They practice capitalism in Texas and justice is a commodity, he simply couldn’t afford to buy any.


True in Dallas and Austin, at least!

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 06:38:47   #
PeterS
 
Richard Rowland wrote:
How can this be happening in Texas, or anywhere else for that matter?



https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/court-allows-city-close-mechanics-shop-without-compensation/

As with all things in Texas, this is about money. The city of Dallas came after one of my properties and I could only convince them to stop when I showed they would be losing tax revenue in the long run. Like any business or government if it hits them in the pocketbook they won't do it...

The question I have is "without compensation." Who owned the property? I have never heard of anyone having their property ceased--unless it was a drug deal--without any form of compensation.

Also, eminent domain ISN'T illegal in Texas. That's how all road easements are achieved--the illegal part is that they have to compensate you.

I suspect that not everything is being told here or at least not being told factually...

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 11:06:04   #
Seth
 
PeterS wrote:
...Also, eminent domain ISN'T illegal in Texas. That's how all road easements are achieved--the illegal part is that they have to compensate you.


You mean that legally, the State of Texas can eminent domain your property for a road or other project without compensating you?

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 11:17:48   #
plainlogic
 
Richard Rowland wrote:
How can this be happening in Texas, or anywhere else for that matter?



https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/court-allows-city-close-mechanics-shop-without-compensation/



It seems if government needs the tax money for infrastructure purposes and its needs. Then, there should be a written guarantee, the property will never be taken by government as long as the taxes are paid. Now, if progress is needed and the property needs to be acquired, the progressor needs to pay for the value of the property plus compensation for locating a new property of equal location and value. If it's a business, they would have to pay compensation for loss of business revenue until the business is up and running, this includes advertisements to accomplish the task. Just my opinion.

Reply
 
 
Sep 1, 2019 11:42:11   #
plainlogic
 
PeterS wrote:
As with all things in Texas, this is about money. The city of Dallas came after one of my properties and I could only convince them to stop when I showed they would be losing tax revenue in the long run. Like any business or government if it hits them in the pocketbook they won't do it...

The question I have is "without compensation." Who owned the property? I have never heard of anyone having their property ceased--unless it was a drug deal--without any form of compensation.

Also, eminent domain ISN'T illegal in Texas. That's how all road easements are achieved--the illegal part is that they have to compensate you.

I suspect that not everything is being told here or at least not being told factually...
As with all things in Texas, this is about money. ... (show quote)



I believe you are correct. Eminent Domain: Eminent Domain
The power to take private property for public use by a state, municipality, or private person or corporation authorized to exercise functions of Public character, following the payment of just compensation to the owner of that property.

https://www.dawsonsodd.com/understanding-condemnation-process-texas/

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 14:22:43   #
ImLogicallyRight
 
plainlogic wrote:
It seems if government needs the tax money for infrastructure purposes and its needs. Then, there should be a written guarantee, the property will never be taken by government as long as the taxes are paid. Now, if progress is needed and the property needs to be acquired, the progressor needs to pay for the value of the property plus compensation for locating a new property of equal location and value. If it's a business, they would have to pay compensation for loss of business revenue until the business is up and running, this includes advertisements to accomplish the task. Just my opinion.
It seems if government needs the tax money for inf... (show quote)


Government officials need to read this and then pass and enforce laws that guarantee this.

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 17:34:21   #
Tug484
 
Seth wrote:
You mean that legally, the State of Texas can eminent domain your property for a road or other project without compensating you?


Actually no, but they might not give the worth of it.

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 17:42:21   #
Seth
 
Tug484 wrote:
Actually no, but they might not give the worth of it.


I can just see some property owner in a Stetson, Winchester in his hands, a chew bulging his cheek, saying, "Sure, lessin' you up the ante some, y'all just come take this here property." 😁

Reply
 
 
Sep 1, 2019 17:53:19   #
Tug484
 
Seth wrote:
I can just see some property owner in a Stetson, Winchester in his hands, a chew bulging his cheek, saying, "Sure, lessin' you up the ante some, y'all just come take this here property." 😁


Yeah, I see it, too.
Boy, it's a good thing they never messed with my dad.
He didn't chew, but he had a big temper.
I remember when they bought land with houses on it to widen the highway.
When they got through, most of the houses were still there.
I didn't get it.

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 17:56:04   #
Seth
 
Tug484 wrote:
Yeah, I see it, too.
Boy, it's a good thing they never messed with my dad.
He didn't chew, but he had a big temper.
I remember when they bought land with houses on it to widen the highway.
When they got through, most of the houses were still there.
I didn't get it.


Probably had something to do with Stetsons, chews & Winchesters.

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 18:16:46   #
Tug484
 
Seth wrote:
Probably had something to do with Stetsons, chews & Winchesters.


No, a Mossberg, fedora hats, Botany 500 suits, and Florsheim shoes.
He looked harmless, but what a temper.

Reply
Sep 1, 2019 19:09:48   #
Seth
 
Tug484 wrote:
No, a Mossberg, fedora hats, Botany 500 suits, and Florsheim shoes.
He looked harmless, but what a temper.



Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.