Rose42 wrote:
ATLANTA, GA – According to a report from the Centers for Disease Control released on Thursday, people with inside, compromising knowledge of Bill and Hillary Clinton’s financial and political dealings are 843% more likely to commit suicide.
“We’ve never seen a single risk factor cause a spike of this magnitude,” a CDC spokesperson told reporters. “Interestingly, in spite of their increased suicide risk, people with dirt on the Clintons rarely show any warning signs of suicide, and they never leave a suicide note.”
Remarking about how a******l it is, the spokesman again stressed the significance of the data.
“Therefore, we advise any American with detrimental information about Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, or the Clinton Foundation to forget about it as quickly as possible to avoid a greatly increased probability of taking your own life,” he cautioned.
“And—I swear—that’s all we know.”
https://babylonbee.com/news/cdc-people-dirt-clintons-843-greater-risk-suicideATLANTA, GA – According to a report from the Cente... (
show quote)
And ~ I swear, I'm laughing my ass off.
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Versus Trump, yeah man...
No disbelief here, the Clinton's are your kind if peeps.
Barracuda2020 wrote:
I knew it but I wondered why you would post it in such a way from the beginning, or was it something you thought and did a quick about-face when you learned it was a satire, no one here will know for sure, but the post was malicious in intent no matter how you slice it.
Oh, you poor baby. Can't handle good hearted fun. You have guys like Joaquin Castro putting lives in danger, and you find this malicious. Everything your party does is malicious, beyond the pale, low-life crap. Get a clue. Or get a life.
slatten49 wrote:
Being highly reprehensible in their own way does not make them murderers of innumerable victims.
In what way do you find Hillary reprehensible?
People on the left will generalize, but not pinpoint like they do on the President.
byronglimish wrote:
T***h!
Castro released public information to the public.
moldyoldy wrote:
Castro released public information to the public.
Your side of America does this kind of tactic, as a target list.
Barracuda2020 wrote:
I***ts from the right are so low in decorum they don't know the differences between civility and a whine, no surprise there, as they constantly practice the behavior of a child, as you are doing now, good job.
I have 4 kids. I recognize whining. And you, my dear, are a great big whiner. Wah.
debeda wrote:
I have 4 kids. I recognize whining. And you, my dear, are a great big whiner. Wah.
He was a whining baby before he changed his stage name too.
byronglimish wrote:
In what way do you find Hillary reprehensible?
People on the left will generalize, but not pinpoint like they do on the President.
For one small example, reprehensible statements such as the following to Christiane Amanpour during an interview in Britain: "You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for" - Hillary Clinton. I say one can and should, as civility is likely to be reciprocated...as is vitriolic speech.
As civility and mutual respect is important to me, I echo the words of President Dwight D. Eisenhower, 'I despise people who go to the gutter on either right or the left and hurl rocks..." Or in Hillary's case above, promoting a lack of civility, which often leads to violence. I will add that, IMO, her "deplorable" comment(s) may well have cost her the 2016 e******n.
I find the same fault with Trump, who would do well to heed the following advice: "Take care of your thoughts when you are alone and take care of your words when you are with people."
byronglimish wrote:
Your side of America does this kind of tactic, as a target list.
A target for boycotts, unlike the right who target with bombs.
slatten49 wrote:
For one small example, reprehensible statements such as the following to Christiane Amanpour during an interview in Britain: "You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for" - Hillary Clinton. I say one can and should, as civility is likely to be reciprocated...as is vitriolic speech.
As civility and mutual respect is important to me, I echo the words of President Dwight D. Eisenhower, 'I despise people who go to the gutter on either right or the left and hurl rocks..." Or in Hillary's case above, promoting a lack of civility, which often leads to violence. I will add that, IMO, her "deplorable" comment(s) may well have cost her the 2016 e******n.
I find the same fault with Trump, who would do well to heed the following advice: "Take care of your thoughts when you are alone and take care of your words when you are with people."
For one small example, reprehensible statements su... (
show quote)
Did you find as acceptable during the B******i testimony, Hillary asking the now infamous question..."at this point what difference does it make?"
moldyoldy wrote:
A target for boycotts, unlike the right who target with bombs.
So a Republican caused the shooting of Steve Scalise at a baseball practise?
byronglimish wrote:
So a Republican caused the shooting of Steve Scalise at a baseball practise?
You are deflecting from the serial mail bomber
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.