dtucker300 wrote:
This news from CA today. Keep in mind that Ridgecrest is east of Bakersfield.
Good morning, and welcome to the Essential California newsletter from the L.A. Times. It’s Wednesday, July 17, and I’m writing from Los Angeles. - Julia Wick
California as a paragon of environmentalism is a loud narrative — one that has shaped headlines and stereotypes and even attitudes, especially in the big cities. The state has been a pioneer on vehicle emissions standards, air pollution legislation and efficiency standards, to name just a few areas of national leadership.
But oil has also played an integral role in the California narrative for nearly a century and a half, since the state’s first real oil well struck “black gold” in 1876. That black gold shaped early 20th-century Southern California, powering the growth of Los Angeles and making fortunes for many of the families whose names still adorn streets and buildings around the state. And that importance is far from confined to history books.
State oil production has been steadily arcing downward since the mid-1980s, but California remains one of the nation’s top petroleum-producing — and gasoline-consuming — states. Until recently, we still produced more oil than any other state but Texas and North Dakota (the Golden State has since slipped to sixth place). Oil and gas companies are also potent political forces that wield major influence in the state Capitol.
[See also: The Center for Investigative Reporting’s 2017 look at “Big Oil’s grip on California”]
The duality of the “two Californias” is a shopworn cliché, but, like many clichés, it prevails for a reason. There is the California of electric cars, kitchen compost bins and vocal opposition to President Trump’s climate policies. Then there is the California of Kern County, where oil and gas production remain a pillar of the local economy and more than 70% of California’s oil and natural gas is produced. The reach of that latter California extends far beyond the southern tip of the San Joaquin Valley — in the first quarter of 2019, the top two spenders on lobbying at the statehouse were Chevron and the broader trade group that represents oil companies.
The constant push-and-pull between California environmentalism and its oil fields came to a public head late last week. On Thursday, Gov. Gavin Newsom fired the state’s top oil regulator after learning that fracking permits had doubled without his knowledge since he became governor, and some of the supervisors tasked with regulating the industry owned shares in major oil companies.
On Friday, news broke that a Chevron oil well in Kern County had leaked nearly 800,000 gallons of crude petroleum and water into a dry creek bed about 35 miles west of Bakersfield over the past two months. The mixture was about one-third oil and two-thirds water, and the flow has since ceased, according to the state Department of Conservation. The seep occurred in an oil field where Chevron uses a process called steam injection to extract underground crude oil.
Ted Goldberg, an editor at KQED News who often reports on Bay Area refineries, uncovered the spill while searching a government database for updates on an entirely separate incident at Chevron’s Richmond refinery in Northern California. “In May, Chevron officials began noticing that oil and water started coming up from the ground when it shouldn’t,” Goldberg explained. “It lasted for a little while and then it stopped. And then on two other occasions since then, it started [again]. The agency that’s responsible for regulating this stuff has been criticized, basically, for doing not an aggressive job in general.”
[Read “Chevron Well at Center of Major Oil Spill in Kern County Oil Field” by Ted Goldberg in KQED]
“Chevron and the state agency that regulates oil and gas and the state water regulators have all emphasized that there’s no drinking water supplies in the area, that there’s no harm to wildlife,” Goldberg said. “And as you can probably expect, environmentalists disagree with that.”
Hollin Kretzmann, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, a nonprofit environmental group, said the damage potentially caused by the spill “still remains to be seen.” Kretzmann characterized the spill as a larger failure of government regulation, calling it “the end result of regulations that are completely inadequate to prevent these accidents from happening and protect the public and the environment.”
“We can’t be a leader in c*****e c****e and protecting the environment if we’re one of the biggest oil and gas producers in the country,” Kretzmann said, touching on the two competing visions of California at play.
The long-term future of oil and gas production in the state remains to be seen. Many environmental groups have been hopeful that Newsom may move to curtail it. The state budget that the new governor signed last month did include a $1.5-million item to study ways to reduce petroleum supply and demand, which certainly seems promising to their cause. But nothing — especially in California — is ever black and white, and an environmentalist victory would also probably deliver deep economic blows to the oil towns of Kern.
This news from CA today. Keep in mind that Ridgec... (
show quote)
What a pile a cover up in the USGS conclusions to the public.
There are several thousand square miles of man drilling pads up to 11,000 thousand feet vertically and horizontally, hundreds of thousands of pads. Entire mountains shaved off and covered with pads.
The subsidence (ground sinking) area shown in the USGS map if t***hful would be close to double the size they represent as subsiding. The ground has sunk as much as 5 feet in majority of the subsidence tapering out to three feet. Lucy Jones is criminal in her hiding the t***h. For my benifit of keeping this reply short, I'll save the details for another conversation.
When big oil removed hundreds of millions of barrels of oil and hundreds of millions of square feet of natural gas from the earth, then a hundred cities including major metropolitan regions (Bakersfield) sink as a result of man drilling and Lucy Jones "Nothing to see here"??? I'm not against oil and gas drilling. I question the genius in drilling into a super volcanoe (Long Valley) or the Clear lake Volcanoe for geo thermo power or causing a large portion of California to sink because of the greed when that greed could be sastifued in none populated locations.
Glen Avon California in the 1800's thousands of drill holes looking for oil. They were not successful in finding oil but several hundred feet down found gold. Sadly they did not have the technology to recover the gold at these deep depths. The drill holes were covered with wood and then three bags of cement to plug the holes.. Lol
Big oil and gas companies have been opening the drill holes and pouring acid into them in order to recover the gold... Very hush hush. If you look at the number of monthly quakes in Gken Avon sometimes 650-1000..... "Nothing to see here.."......
. Jack