One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
To PEE or not to PEE....
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jul 16, 2019 10:39:39   #
bahmer
 
Squiddiddler wrote:
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it has no chance.

TO PEE OR NOT TO PEE?

I have a job.

I work, they pay me.

I pay my taxes & the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit.

In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test
(with which I have no problem).

What I do have a problem with is the distribution
of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

So, here is my question:
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to
get a welfare check because I have to pass
one to earn it for them?

Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.
I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their BUTT----
doing drugs while I work..

Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a
urine test to get a public assistance check?

I guess we could call the program
URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"!

Pass this along if you agree or simply
delete if you don't.
Hope you all will pass it along, though.
Something has to change in this country
- AND SOON!

Just a thought, all politicians should have
to pass a urine test too!...
They should also have to pass an intelligence
test, a common sense test and an understanding
the constitution test, as well!
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it ha... (show quote)


Amen and Amen couldn't agree more. Spot on.

Reply
Jul 16, 2019 12:38:03   #
ExperienceCounts
 
Squiddiddler wrote:
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it has no chance.

TO PEE OR NOT TO PEE?

I have a job.

I work, they pay me.

I pay my taxes & the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit.

In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test
(with which I have no problem).

What I do have a problem with is the distribution
of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

So, here is my question:
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to
get a welfare check because I have to pass
one to earn it for them?

Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.
I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their BUTT----
doing drugs while I work..

Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a
urine test to get a public assistance check?

I guess we could call the program
URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"!

Pass this along if you agree or simply
delete if you don't.
Hope you all will pass it along, though.
Something has to change in this country
- AND SOON!

Just a thought, all politicians should have
to pass a urine test too!...
They should also have to pass an intelligence
test, a common sense test and an understanding
the constitution test, as well!
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it ha... (show quote)



Reply
Jul 16, 2019 13:26:15   #
badbob85037
 
Squiddiddler wrote:
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it has no chance.

TO PEE OR NOT TO PEE?

I have a job.

I work, they pay me.

I pay my taxes & the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit.

In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test
(with which I have no problem).

What I do have a problem with is the distribution
of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

So, here is my question:
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to
get a welfare check because I have to pass
one to earn it for them?

Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.
I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their BUTT----
doing drugs while I work..

Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a
urine test to get a public assistance check?

I guess we could call the program
URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"!

Pass this along if you agree or simply
delete if you don't.
Hope you all will pass it along, though.
Something has to change in this country
- AND SOON!

Just a thought, all politicians should have
to pass a urine test too!...
They should also have to pass an intelligence
test, a common sense test and an understanding
the constitution test, as well!
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it ha... (show quote)


It's guilty till proven innocent.

Reply
 
 
Jul 16, 2019 13:50:13   #
Fit2BTied Loc: Texas
 
Squiddiddler wrote:
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it has no chance.

TO PEE OR NOT TO PEE?

I have a job.

I work, they pay me.

I pay my taxes & the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit.

In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test
(with which I have no problem).

What I do have a problem with is the distribution
of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

So, here is my question:
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to
get a welfare check because I have to pass
one to earn it for them?

Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.
I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their BUTT----
doing drugs while I work..

Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a
urine test to get a public assistance check?

I guess we could call the program
URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"!

Pass this along if you agree or simply
delete if you don't.
Hope you all will pass it along, though.
Something has to change in this country
- AND SOON!

Just a thought, all politicians should have
to pass a urine test too!...
They should also have to pass an intelligence
test, a common sense test and an understanding
the constitution test, as well!
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it ha... (show quote)
"URINE OR YOU'RE OUT" I like it! Unfortunately, the relaxing of laws related to drug use is part of the strategy being used to ruin America and make many of us unable to take care of ourselves. Hard to wake up and fight when you're goal every day is how do I get high.

Reply
Jul 16, 2019 14:29:12   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
no propaganda please wrote:
That is not where you are supposed to put the collection bottle.



Reply
Jul 16, 2019 15:58:40   #
Reality
 
Squiddiddler wrote:
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it has no chance.

TO PEE OR NOT TO PEE?

I have a job.

I work, they pay me.

I pay my taxes & the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit.

In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test
(with which I have no problem).

What I do have a problem with is the distribution
of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

So, here is my question:
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to
get a welfare check because I have to pass
one to earn it for them?

Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.
I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their BUTT----
doing drugs while I work..

Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a
urine test to get a public assistance check?

I guess we could call the program
URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"!

Pass this along if you agree or simply
delete if you don't.
Hope you all will pass it along, though.
Something has to change in this country
- AND SOON!

Just a thought, all politicians should have
to pass a urine test too!...
They should also have to pass an intelligence
test, a common sense test and an understanding
the constitution test, as well!
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it ha... (show quote)


Your logic is highly flawed. No one should be taking pee tests. Nowhere in the constitution is this allowed!

Reply
Jul 16, 2019 16:23:22   #
Hug
 
Reality wrote:
Your logic is highly flawed. No one should be taking pee tests. Nowhere in the constitution is this allowed!


BS, constitution doesn't mention per test.

Reply
 
 
Jul 16, 2019 16:31:40   #
Reality
 
Exactly my point.

Reply
Jul 16, 2019 16:39:37   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
no propaganda please wrote:
You are absolutely correct and it would be a good idea, but it AIN'T going to happen.


Yep, "Archie's" right. Either pluck a hair or draw some blood, but do it as a surprise.

Reply
Jul 16, 2019 17:14:33   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Reality wrote:
Your logic is highly flawed. No one should be taking pee tests. Nowhere in the constitution is this allowed!


I disagree. Certain industries need clean employees.
Would you want the pilot of your airplane to be high, or the guy behind the wheel of that 80,000 lb truck coming at you? I don't know about pilots, but I know for a fact about how a lot of truck drivers used to roll back in the day, and over years of driving the highways, I've seen more horrific crashes involving trucks than I can count.

Reply
Jul 16, 2019 18:30:32   #
Carol Kelly
 
Squiddiddler wrote:
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it has no chance.

TO PEE OR NOT TO PEE?

I have a job.

I work, they pay me.

I pay my taxes & the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit.

In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test
(with which I have no problem).

What I do have a problem with is the distribution
of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

So, here is my question:
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to
get a welfare check because I have to pass
one to earn it for them?

Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.
I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their BUTT----
doing drugs while I work..

Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a
urine test to get a public assistance check?

I guess we could call the program
URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"!

Pass this along if you agree or simply
delete if you don't.
Hope you all will pass it along, though.
Something has to change in this country
- AND SOON!

Just a thought, all politicians should have
to pass a urine test too!...
They should also have to pass an intelligence
test, a common sense test and an understanding
the constitution test, as well!
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it ha... (show quote)


The most sensible idea I’ve read in a long while. I. Sending it on

Reply
 
 
Jul 16, 2019 20:36:24   #
blaise
 
Squiddiddler wrote:
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it has no chance.

TO PEE OR NOT TO PEE?

I have a job.

I work, they pay me.

I pay my taxes & the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit.

In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test
(with which I have no problem).

What I do have a problem with is the distribution
of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

So, here is my question:
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to
get a welfare check because I have to pass
one to earn it for them?

Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.
I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their BUTT----
doing drugs while I work..

Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a
urine test to get a public assistance check?

I guess we could call the program
URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"!

Pass this along if you agree or simply
delete if you don't.
Hope you all will pass it along, though.
Something has to change in this country
- AND SOON!

Just a thought, all politicians should have
to pass a urine test too!...
They should also have to pass an intelligence
test, a common sense test and an understanding
the constitution test, as well!
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it ha... (show quote)


Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a
urine test to get a public assistance check? No I couldn't imagine...& I have too much respect to pee in a bottle for anybody...unless they need to hydrate

Reply
Jul 16, 2019 20:51:54   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
Squiddiddler wrote:
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it has no chance.

TO PEE OR NOT TO PEE?

I have a job.

I work, they pay me.

I pay my taxes & the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit.

In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test
(with which I have no problem).

What I do have a problem with is the distribution
of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

So, here is my question:
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to
get a welfare check because I have to pass
one to earn it for them?

Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.
I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their BUTT----
doing drugs while I work..

Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a
urine test to get a public assistance check?

I guess we could call the program
URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"!

Pass this along if you agree or simply
delete if you don't.
Hope you all will pass it along, though.
Something has to change in this country
- AND SOON!

Just a thought, all politicians should have
to pass a urine test too!...
They should also have to pass an intelligence
test, a common sense test and an understanding
the constitution test, as well!
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it ha... (show quote)



Reply
Jul 16, 2019 21:31:30   #
blaise
 
kankune wrote:


I like you humor...urine reference
I don't think anybody who hasn't broken a law should offer up any part of his/her body. I have more respect for myself than than. You have to ask yourself what they could do with that personal information. I think the government already has enough power.

Reply
Jul 16, 2019 22:16:09   #
maryjane
 
Squiddiddler wrote:
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it has no chance.

TO PEE OR NOT TO PEE?

I have a job.

I work, they pay me.

I pay my taxes & the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit.

In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test
(with which I have no problem).

What I do have a problem with is the distribution
of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

So, here is my question:
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to
get a welfare check because I have to pass
one to earn it for them?

Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet.
I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their BUTT----
doing drugs while I work..

Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a
urine test to get a public assistance check?

I guess we could call the program
URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"!

Pass this along if you agree or simply
delete if you don't.
Hope you all will pass it along, though.
Something has to change in this country
- AND SOON!

Just a thought, all politicians should have
to pass a urine test too!...
They should also have to pass an intelligence
test, a common sense test and an understanding
the constitution test, as well!
Simple, Logical and Sensible. Probably means it ha... (show quote)


I agree. And there is a vast difference in providing a few months of temporary assistance to help someone get back on their feet and providing every kind of help permanently, forever, for generations AND an ever bigger difference in providing our tax supported assistance forever to foreigners who are not citizens of our country, just foreign s**mmers exploiting our country and we who are forced to pay the bills.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.