Alicia wrote:
***************
Thanks. But I don't think I'm good enough in that area.
:D :D :D
Maybe not but keep trying honey,your getting almost as good as Patty :-o :mrgreen:
Alicia wrote:
*****************
I definitely agree to such a course. Usually it was covered in such courses as Literature and Political Science. It would be interesting to locate texts for such a course.
From what I've seen, the "new" education automatically includes such thinking. Another poster on this forum complained about a math problem where questions were asked based on an illustration (or diagram) that the answers could be answered "considering 20 initial items." He complained that in the first diagram there were only 19 items. I don't know why, but this confused him because his thinking was so limited. I don't believe this was a printing error. The only honest answer would be that "solutions could not be found based on the diagram." All that was necessary was to recognize that the first diagram contained one less than was stated. Anyone who expects to answer an unsolvable problem is the bearer of constricted thinking. He also could have responded on the assumption that there actually were 20 items. But his answers would require that this be stated initially. (No imagination.)
***************** br I definitely agree to such a ... (
show quote)
To get the job done thoroughly, Alicia, we'd have to start in grammar school with vocabulary lessons - words like objective and subjective. With this basic background, students are ready to get into stuff like determining if a data source is objective and the importance of semantics.
An adult population with that training would create some radical change!
PoppaGringo wrote:
:thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:
You just add so much to the debate.
I hope it don't tire you out too much.
Floyd Brown wrote:
You just add so much to the debate.
I hope it don't tire you out too much.
You must have had quite a rest since you are replying to something written in June of 2014.
PoppaGringo wrote:
You must have had quite a rest since you are replying to something written in June of 2014.
You are concerned with the date of response and intelligent people are concerned about the content of the response. Stupid and evil are timeless.
PoppaGringo wrote:
You must have had quite a rest since you are replying to something written in June of 2014.
No that was a reply by you on this topic
:thumbup: or :thumbdown:
Seems to be how many of your post are.
Glaucon wrote:
You are concerned with the date of response and intelligent people are concerned about the content of the response. Stupid and evil are timeless.
Y'know Glaucon, lately I've been thinking about the difference between really stupid and merely ignorant. Stupidity, of course, is permanent, and may result from genetic inheritance or some sort of brain damage. Ignorance, on the other hand, is curable. Judging textual construction and spelling, several posters on this forum aren't stupid, but surprisingly ignorant.
Wouldn't it be great if every grammar and high school in the country had courses on critical thinking? FOX News would rail against such a plan of course - it would slowly put them out of business! What a delightful idea!!
rumitoid wrote:
And how did that add to the debate?
***************
Rumitoid: You really must learn to accept the fact that CB has absolutely no control. Every so often he feels it is necessary for him to gain some attention - either positive or negative - solely in order to have himself recognized. He must be quite lonely.
Neal wrote:
Y'know Glaucon, lately I've been thinking about the difference between really stupid and merely ignorant. Stupidity, of course, is permanent, and may result from genetic inheritance or some sort of brain damage. Ignorance, on the other hand, is curable. Judging textual construction and spelling, several posters on this forum aren't stupid, but surprisingly ignorant.
Wouldn't it be great if every grammar and high school in the country had courses on critical thinking? FOX News would rail against such a plan of course - it would slowly put them out of business! What a delightful idea!!
Y'know Glaucon, lately I've been thinking about th... (
show quote)
Neal, Can you believe the comments on this thread in which the knuckle d**ggers claim they believe their fellow authoritarian followers are growing in numbers? Delusional.
Glaucon wrote:
Neal, Can you believe the comments on this thread in which the knuckle d**ggers claim they believe their fellow authoritarian followers are growing in numbers? Delusional.
And the ridiculous name calling! I guess it reinforces their delusional natures to invent 'cute' names for the better educated; names like "libtard". Occasionally a responding insult-name comes to mind like "righturd," but I'm too polite to stoop that low . . .
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.