Ignorant Arrogance
Jun 3, 2014 01:22:14 #
Floyd Brown
Loc: Milwaukee WI
Brian Devon wrote:
************
If the GOP spent as much time reaching out to women and minorities as they do whining about President Obama, they might one day re-take the White House.
Personally I think they much prefer b***hing and moaning about our commander-in-chief than actually being adults who can govern.
The GOP rules:
1. First, break the government.
2. Whine about the government being broken.
If the GOP spent as much time reaching out to women and minorities as they do whining about President Obama, they might one day re-take the White House.
Personally I think they much prefer b***hing and moaning about our commander-in-chief than actually being adults who can govern.
The GOP rules:
1. First, break the government.
2. Whine about the government being broken.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jun 3, 2014 01:29:42 #
cant beleve
Loc: Planet Kolob
Armageddun wrote:
glu-coon rhymes with moon, the place from which we get luna-tics :thumbup: :thumbup: Hi Buddy :arrow: :shock: :shock:
Especially the dark side of the moon. Reminds me of pink Floyd
The lunatics inside my head... Definitely a good description of glaucoon
Jun 3, 2014 01:31:13 #
cant beleve wrote:
Especially the dark side of the moon. Reminds me of pink Floyd
The lunatics inside my head... Definitely a good description of glaucoon
The lunatics inside my head... Definitely a good description of glaucoon
And how did that add to the debate?
Jun 3, 2014 02:09:32 #
cant beleve
Loc: Planet Kolob
rumitoid wrote:
And how did that add to the debate?
It wasn't directed at you so what's the b***h?
Jun 3, 2014 02:10:41 #
cant beleve
Loc: Planet Kolob
rumitoid wrote:
And how did that add to the debate?
It wasn't directed at you so what's the b***h? Looks like time for your nap nap
Jun 3, 2014 02:15:02 #
cant beleve wrote:
It wasn't directed at you so what's the b***h? Looks like time for your nap nap
Dictating the parameters of free speech, cant believe? In an open forum, I am not allowed to respond to any posts, only those you deem I can? Limited government?
But u r right, time for my nap.
Jun 3, 2014 06:24:52 #
Jun 3, 2014 16:57:52 #
Alicia wrote:
***************
Thank you for the compliment, Neal. I do try. Some people are so very quick to attack before they even understand a statement.
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :wink:
Thank you for the compliment, Neal. I do try. Some people are so very quick to attack before they even understand a statement.
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :wink:
Yes, Alicia, and the most unfortunate t***h is the inability to understand. Without that somewhat developed capacity, one's grasp of reality can get amazingly twisted.
Do you agree with the idea that every high school curriculum should include a course on critical thinking?
Jun 3, 2014 18:57:01 #
cant beleve wrote:
Especially the dark side of the moon. Reminds me of pink Floyd
The lunatics inside my head... Definitely a good description of glaucoon
The lunatics inside my head... Definitely a good description of glaucoon
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jun 3, 2014 19:00:15 #
rumitoid wrote:
And how did that add to the debate?
There are no proper rules of debate when Glucon is involved. He is a master deflector. Sorry to intrude.
Jun 3, 2014 21:03:35 #
Alicia
Loc: NYC
Neal wrote:
Yes, Alicia, and the most unfortunate t***h is the inability to understand. Without that somewhat developed capacity, one's grasp of reality can get amazingly twisted.
Do you agree with the idea that every high school curriculum should include a course on critical thinking?
Do you agree with the idea that every high school curriculum should include a course on critical thinking?
*****************
I definitely agree to such a course. Usually it was covered in such courses as Literature and Political Science. It would be interesting to locate texts for such a course.
From what I've seen, the "new" education automatically includes such thinking. Another poster on this forum complained about a math problem where questions were asked based on an illustration (or diagram) that the answers could be answered "considering 20 initial items." He complained that in the first diagram there were only 19 items. I don't know why, but this confused him because his thinking was so limited. I don't believe this was a printing error. The only honest answer would be that "solutions could not be found based on the diagram." All that was necessary was to recognize that the first diagram contained one less than was stated. Anyone who expects to answer an unsolvable problem is the bearer of constricted thinking. He also could have responded on the assumption that there actually were 20 items. But his answers would require that this be stated initially. (No imagination.)
Jun 3, 2014 21:04:52 #
Alicia
Loc: NYC
Armageddun wrote:
There are no proper rules of debate when Glucon is involved. He is a master deflector. Sorry to intrude.
***************
The entire basis of debate is to be a master deflector.
:roll: :D :D :D
Jun 3, 2014 21:19:04 #
cant beleve
Loc: Planet Kolob
Alicia wrote:
***************
The entire basis of debate is to be a master deflector.
:roll: :D :D :D
The entire basis of debate is to be a master deflector.
:roll: :D :D :D
No wonder these threads are so darn long. You both have the deflection part down pat. :arrow: :thumbdown:
Jun 3, 2014 21:38:08 #
Alicia wrote:
***************
The entire basis of debate is to be a master deflector.
:roll: :D :D :D
The entire basis of debate is to be a master deflector.
:roll: :D :D :D
What's the problem then? Why the question if that is the basis of the comment?
Perhaps I should have addressed this comment to Rumi. :lol: :lol: :?:
Jun 4, 2014 01:35:33 #
Alicia
Loc: NYC
cant beleve wrote:
No wonder these threads are so darn long. You both have the deflection part down pat. :arrow: :thumbdown:
***************
Thanks. But I don't think I'm good enough in that area.
:D :D :D
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.