One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Bombshell: G****l W*****g Is NOT Caused by Man
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
Jul 17, 2019 20:13:22   #
JoyV
 
Seth wrote:
The only way to actually do as you suggest in your tiring, "progressively" sanctimonious tone, would be for mankind to tear down and recycle our homes, cars, computers, phones, power grid, etc and begin living off the land. Just a knife and a loin cloth.

Suppose you set a good example for us and lead the way.
The only way to actually do as you suggest in your... (show quote)


Wouldn't the act of creating a knife be altering nature?

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 20:21:40   #
JoyV
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Maybe that's the problem. Why is your bar set so low to allow industry to be completely irresponsible for their own waste? Who should be responsible for it? Are they not the ones producing it and do profit from it. If we continue to find ways to use our waste, we'll all be ahead of the game. It's only due to regulations that R&D have found methods to recycle, let's stay the course, we wouldn't if industry doesn't have to be accountable. Just saying.


In this country, and many others, they DO have to be accountable. There is a big chasm between reasonable regulations for safety and to protect the environment, and the dizzying effort by industry to keep up with more than a hundred new regs a month(which is what Obama was signing. During his presidency he signed 20,642 new regulations!) The former protects Americans and our environment. The latter hurts Americans as more and more industries fled the impossible regulations and high taxes, or downsized, or folded; and left Americans with both fewer and lower paying jobs.

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 20:29:12   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
JoyV wrote:
The NASA site still stands firmly behind g****l w*****g. But NASA scientists are finding results which don't fit the narrative. It is the science I am following, not the politics. A good scientist does not collect evidence to support a pre-assumed conclusion. A good scientist collects all the evidence and THEN draws conclusions from the evidence. Most articles and studies on antarctic sea ice are based off models instead of actually measuring the ice. So you see article after article claiming antarctic sea ice is in dizzying decline. In fact, they all use those same words, "dizzying decline". Not rapid decline, or severe decline. No all say dizzying decline. But the ice studies where the ice is actually MEASURED, tell a different story.

This abstract is for a planned study through drilling a bore through the Ross ice shelf. They expected to find evidence of melting.
https://antarctica.recollect.co.nz/nodes/view/64359

This article (I can't find an abstract), is after the bore study was made and the finding did not fit with their preconceived notions.
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/02/ross-ice-shelf-bore-antarctica-freezing/

This is a separate study using an underwater drone.
https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo2299

Yet NASA and many more articles than covered the above studies, claim the Ross ice shelf is melting at dizzying rates. If you read the abstracts behind these finding, the evidence comes from climate models, NOT actual measurements!!!!

So yes the NASA site has become corrupt. But it is slanting its articles and studies to favor the g****l w*****g narrative, not anything from Trump.
The NASA site still stands firmly behind g****l w*... (show quote)


All articles righ on track for predicting the end of Earth is certain to become a super hot planet, C*****e C****e is only speeding things up could be by billions of years.

One reason being that the Ross Ice Shelf LIVESCIENC (Antarctica's Iceburg is About to Die ... Near the Equator), has been drifting for 20 years broken off from the the land beneath Antarctica, Australia was once part of that Antarctic land mass but began to separate only 85 million and finally drifted away 30 million years ago.

LIVESCIENC "What is Gondwana" Gondwana broke up 180 million years ago, at that time constituted Africa, South America, The Arabian Peninsula, and India.

Australia was the last to leave.

The Ross ice shelf is 2,000 sq miles and was never supported by a solid foundation so won't contribute to sea rise, but it was a buttress holding glacial ice back and reflects sunlight.

The problem was since 1978 to 2014 the Antarctic ice cap wasn't melting while Arctic ice was rapidly melting.

Probably this was the El Nino having a cooling effect by causing cold water ocean currents to migrate south and the breaking off of the Ross Ice Shelf which is the 3 rd massive recent ice berg to break and head north was going to happen anyway.

Antarctican rocks are 4 billion years old the earth is 4•6 billion years old, Antarctica is the origin of Earth. The Antarctic Continent is 13 million sq miles without its ice Australia is 7•7 million.

There were dinasours in Antarctica and giant marsupials when the two Continents were part of the same land mass.

There are rocky outcrops that are snow and ice free, but they represent only 1% of Antarctica. The T***santartic Mountain ranges are the longest in the world and never get washed away by erosion.

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 20:48:41   #
JoyV
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Gotha, all of what you guys listen to are the founders of t***h, just like Trump, and all what we listen to, are lies, Yeah... I'm very familiar with that/your perspective.

Here's the thing, what facts are reported, which are numbers, it doesn't matter who gives them out.


But it matters where the numbers come from. I've already given examples of numbers from the measurements taken in a science study vs the numbers from running a computer model. But there are also studies set up to result in the numbers one groups wants. I'll give an example with dogs. There have been several long term studies on the effects of neutering (male or female) on the dog. These studies usually break down into different age groups the dog was in when neutered. Based on these studies, there is developing a trend with vets to recommend waiting until the long bones have fused, which happens under the regulation of growth hormones. The pituitary gland cut back on growth hormone due to a feedback mechanism of other hormones from various glands including sex hormones produced in the gonads. All the studies I've read the abstracts of conclude early neutering can lead to various sorts of cancers. Various ones have also come up with one or more of the following. Long bone non cancer problems, non cancerous tumors, various other medical issues, even including increased aggressive behavior and other behavioral problems.

But the HSUS and PETA had been telling people for years that there was no harm to early neutering, and it was actually healthier to neuter as early as 8 weeks of age. So they funded a study. They published their results in articles which said they'd done a long term study across breeds and sizes which proved there was no harm from early neutering of any breed of dog. But if you read the abstract, they started with 48 dogs. All were young puppies when neutered and they had no control group of intact dogs. The largest dog in the study was a 32 pound dog. Most were under 15 pounds. The study went for 8 months. During that time, 13 died. They did not include the deaths in the study results. The dogs were not yet even adults when they published their conclusions. They used percentages not numbers for the dogs. Makes sense as if they used numbers anyone with an ounce of understanding how science experiments are set up would realize the numbers were no where close to what they should be to come to any conclusion as to whether or not early neutering caused any harm.

So which numbers do you believe?

Reply
Jul 17, 2019 21:31:34   #
JoyV
 
RT friend wrote:
All articles righ on track for predicting the end of Earth is certain to become a super hot planet, C*****e C****e is only speeding things up could be by billions of years.

One reason being that the Ross Ice Shelf LIVESCIENC (Antarctica's Iceburg is About to Die ... Near the Equator), has been drifting for 20 years broken off from the the land beneath Antarctica, Australia was once part of that Antarctic land mass but began to separate only 85 million and finally drifted away 30 million years ago.

LIVESCIENC "What is Gondwana" Gondwana broke up 180 million years ago, at that time constituted Africa, South America, The Arabian Peninsula, and India.

Australia was the last to leave.

The Ross ice shelf is 2,000 sq miles and was never supported by a solid foundation so won't contribute to sea rise, but it was a buttress holding glacial ice back and reflects sunlight.

The problem was since 1978 to 2014 the Antarctic ice cap wasn't melting while Arctic ice was rapidly melting.

Probably this was the El Nino having a cooling effect by causing cold water ocean currents to migrate south and the breaking off of the Ross Ice Shelf which is the 3 rd massive recent ice berg to break and head north was going to happen anyway.

Antarctican rocks are 4 billion years old the earth is 4•6 billion years old, Antarctica is the origin of Earth. The Antarctic Continent is 13 million sq miles without its ice Australia is 7•7 million.

There were dinasours in Antarctica and giant marsupials when the two Continents were part of the same land mass.

There are rocky outcrops that are snow and ice free, but they represent only 1% of Antarctica. The T***santartic Mountain ranges are the longest in the world and never get washed away by erosion.
All articles righ on track for predicting the end ... (show quote)


The area surrounding Greenland is melting. Far from Greenland is expanding. Since there have been found multiple plate hot spots under Greenland, it is a fair guess they have something to do with the melting. This would also explain why the melting is far more from the bottom than in glaciers far from Greenland.

https://newatlas.com/hotspot-greenland-ice-loss/45571/



Reply
Jul 18, 2019 00:31:43   #
RT friend Loc: Kangaroo valley NSW Australia
 
JoyV wrote:
The area surrounding Greenland is melting. Far from Greenland is expanding. Since there have been found multiple plate hot spots under Greenland, it is a fair guess they have something to do with the melting. This would also explain why the melting is far more from the bottom than in glaciers far from Greenland.

https://newatlas.com/hotspot-greenland-ice-loss/45571/


Greenland losing 2,700 gigatons of ice between 2003 & 2013, - hummm !! it's interesting that since this 'accurate measurements antithesis' which is Antarctica only began losing ice in 2014, when before 2014 and from 1978 Antarctica not losing ice, I wonder if there is a Theological or Philosophical reason based on human attitude, maybe God is doubling down.

I'm not really familiar with the Arctic situation, however first let me just say before I elaborate, there is still about 5 billion years of hydrogen left in the sun's gas tank, but that doesn't mean it will be smooth sailing for Earth all that time, what could go wrong is a number of things, the most likely is drilling holes deep in the ground because beneath the Earth's mantle there is a confluence of molten lava and it's gradual more solid cool state, as your article points out.

Probably as the Tectonic plates plates formed 3•5 billion years ago a cooling of the Earth's crust began a never-ending drift, but some fissures remained open a bit and let some heat come up to the surface which broke up the crust and caused the plates to continually shift.

When they collide one slips under the other and starts going down which is alarming as things change rapidly on the surface accounting for Iceland's volcanoes, so this isn't happening directly below Greenland and a hotspot is stationary causing ice to be lost that can't be measured from space by NASA.

I think there was something in the article I posted about Greenland sinking, this isn't new probably 20 years ago I heard Greenland was below sea level except for the fringes, it was assumed the weigh of the ice caused Greenland to sink, I think NASA is saying that it's now on the rise so this could be because the weight is less.

About gravitational fields maybe pushing up is the same thing, except the East coast being softened by the hot spot doesn't agree with weigh pushing down which would press hardest in the middle during the last ice age 12 thousand years ago.

Installing 50 GPS units to see if that area is rising is new to me, but appears to be a way of checking the hot spot without drilling holes, I'm surprised they haven't drilled already.

"Anomalous uplift" described by the article, good one. I'd say Ohio State University is on the same page as NASA.

Knowledge is power and the ultimate power is causing death GPS is preferable to holes drilled in the ground.

I suppose that's one reason for the popularity of Theology, causing death is abstracted away by working out what's happening, and for whose benefit, at least for individuals that is true superficially only, as the nett result can't be known until it's too late.

Let me give my one paragraph take, coming from the philosophy of Theological cognition. - We are all only animals with a Divine mission, that being, developing Divinity, following on in the image of God due to the fact that the environment caused a linking of opposites by attraction, God swallowed satan, but we can't replicate that, what happen after that was mystery until this very second, although it was clear before it's even more so now as the idea came to me from another idea regurgitated up (from God), simple matter of into nothing something comes out because reversal is only possible when God is unwell.



Reply
Jul 18, 2019 08:02:22   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Seth wrote:
The only way to actually do as you suggest in your tiring, "progressively" sanctimonious tone, would be for mankind to tear down and recycle our homes, cars, computers, phones, power grid, etc and begin living off the land. Just a knife and a loin cloth.

Suppose you set a good example for us and lead the way.
The only way to actually do as you suggest in your... (show quote)


Lololololl damnit Seth!! I haven’t had a coffee drip in sometime and you damn near caused me to choke laughing here!!
The visual is rather funny!!!

Watch for a payback...😂
Watch for a payback...😂...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.