Bombshell Poll Changed Everything About Dems Chances Of Defeat Trump In 2020
Jun 27, 2019 14:31:55 #
Lonewolf wrote:
What I see is a room full of people who can defeat him
"What I see is a room full of people who can defeat him" - Lonely wolf
https://youtu.be/djU4Lq_5EaM
Now! That gives me even more confidence that Trump has it in the bag.
Jun 27, 2019 14:35:40 #
eagleye13 wrote:
"What I see is a room full of people who can defeat him" - Lonely wolf
https://youtu.be/djU4Lq_5EaM
Now! That gives me even more confidence that Trump has it in the bag.
https://youtu.be/djU4Lq_5EaM
Now! That gives me even more confidence that Trump has it in the bag.
We will see he wasn't popular last time lost popular v**e he's more disliked now.
He's closely following in Nixon's footsteps and we know how that turned out.
Jun 27, 2019 14:48:39 #
Lonewolf wrote:
We will see he wasn't popular last time lost popular v**e he's more disliked now.
He's closely following in Nixon's footsteps and we know how that turned out.
He's closely following in Nixon's footsteps and we know how that turned out.
Sooo! you believe in CNN comentary.
BTW; California is cleaning up its v****g rolls.
Dead people will not be v****g once or twice.
Jun 27, 2019 15:10:45 #
eagleye13 wrote:
Sooo! you believe in CNN comentary.
BTW; California is cleaning up its v****g rolls.
Dead people will not be v****g once or twice.
BTW; California is cleaning up its v****g rolls.
Dead people will not be v****g once or twice.
The part you miss about that is just because someone died and weren't taken off the rools dosent mean they v**ed.
Jun 27, 2019 17:24:30 #
Lonewolf wrote:
We will see he wasn't popular last time lost popular v**e he's more disliked now.
The more pressing concern is the absurd notion that Hillary is more legitimate because she won a game that neither candidate was playing.
If Hillary had reached 270 and without winning the popular v**e, not a single left-wing protester would be demanding that e*****rs switch their v**es to Trump.
It’s an interesting argument, but who ultimately cares? Those aren’t the rules.
Protesters and petition-signers need to understand that Donald T***p w*n under the only rules that mattered. The rest is just hypothetical.
Hillary’s campaign is like a football team that piled up more total yards but couldn’t put the ball in the end zone.
And from my standpoint at the moment, Trump wins in 2020, the e******n is just a formality.
Jun 27, 2019 22:22:31 #
Lonewolf wrote:
The biggest difference between 2016 and 2020 is now we know trump and he can never overcome that and win..
You didn't know him in 2016 ? WTF does that mean ?
Jun 28, 2019 06:18:55 #
Jun 28, 2019 06:21:10 #
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Could this possibly be one of the many polls that were predicted HRC would blow Trump away in 2016? I still enjoy watching the media's reactions to the e******n results as they came in. And yet you still accuse conservatives of looking only at polls they like. Your h**e for anything to the right of center is exceeded by only your ignorance of facts.
My point is simply that if he doesn’t believe in poling data he has no business using it in his posts
Jun 28, 2019 09:30:24 #
crazylibertarian
Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Could this possibly be one of the many polls that were predicted HRC would blow Trump away in 2016? I still enjoy watching the media's reactions to the e******n results as they came in. And yet you still accuse conservatives of looking only at polls they like. Your h**e for anything to the right of center is exceeded by only your ignorance of facts.
My sentiments exactly.
There's an old saying, attributed to Mark Twain but also said to be from old New England; better to say nothing and look stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. Kevyn never got that lesson. He must think the egg on his face looks good.
Jun 28, 2019 09:36:15 #
crazylibertarian wrote:
My sentiments exactly. br br There's an old say... (show quote)
"Kevyn never got that lesson. He must think the egg on his face looks good."
Yep!
Kevyn receives eggs over easy on a regular basis.
Jun 28, 2019 09:37:34 #
crazylibertarian
Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
Kevyn wrote:
My point is simply that if he doesn’t believe in poling data he has no business using it in his posts
The same applies to you.
Jun 28, 2019 09:52:54 #
jimpack123
Loc: wisconsin
Lonewolf wrote:
Well if you conseder he lost the popular v**e by 3 million and now that we have seen him in action,one scandal after another and looking at all his lies hes told.
How he wasted almost 2 years when he controlled all branches of government and never put hillery in jail. Nor did Mexico pay for the wall and we still have Obama care.
By and large the American people see trump as an embarrassing.
How he wasted almost 2 years when he controlled all branches of government and never put hillery in jail. Nor did Mexico pay for the wall and we still have Obama care.
By and large the American people see trump as an embarrassing.
Amen
Jun 28, 2019 09:59:31 #
crazylibertarian wrote:
The same applies to you.
The problem is; polls like this could have been taken seriously.
HOLY MELTDOWN, BATMAN! Watch Rachel Maddow get that SMIRK wiped off her face E******n Night 2016
(Go back to beginning of video.)
https://youtu.be/kei5QXLQ_kk
Jun 28, 2019 10:06:27 #
Kevyn wrote:
Since your post is about a poll I will give you cr... (show quote)
Kevin, polls always have objectives and unless someone pays or researches very hard, that info is not easy to come by. This FOX poll and several others done over the last several months, were all designed to be worst case scenarios.
For example:
If we went to war with Iran or NK, would that change your v**e?
If the stock market lost 30% of it's current value, would that change your v**e?
If Trump was found guilty of collusion, would that change your v**e?
If GOP had worst turn out in history and Dems had best turnout in history, how would that effect the e******n?
So, again, I would suggest you do some micro research on objectives of polls , before you smile too much.
Jun 28, 2019 11:33:53 #
jimpack123
Loc: wisconsin
CodyCoonhound wrote:
Kevin, polls always have objectives and unless som... (show quote)
I would say 50 percent chance of war with Iran. unless Trump caves again either way Trump is destroying himself. I wish Somebody from the GOP would run against Trump besides Weld
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.