SHAMBLES: Bombshell Poll Changed Everything About Dems Chances Of Defeat Trump In 2020
https://thebeardedpatriot.com/author/m-mcintosh/

President Donald Trump is in a great position going into the 2020 e******n, and now there’s even more proof.

According to a new poll from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, Democratic v**ers basically have no idea about the policies of the 25 Democratic candidates.

Their lack of interest screams out loud that there’s no point in researching Trump’s opponents because they already know the president’s winning policies and they’re working.

As reported by MSN:



Amen Brother. Excellent Post

Nearly two dozen Democratic p**********l candidates have crisscrossed the country for six months selling their vision for the United States. But, on the eve of the first debates in the campaign , a new poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research shows most Democratic v**ers haven’t fully tuned in.

Only 22% of Democrats registered to v**e say they know a lot about the candidates’ positions, while 62% say they know a little. And only 35% say they’re paying close attention to the campaign, with almost two-thirds saying they’re paying some or no attention.

Two thirds of Democratic v**ers are paying only some, or no attention? Two thirds?

If that’s not proof of a red wave coming, than I don’t know what is!

Another interesting piece of proof is just the astonishingly large number of people running.

In a normal e******n people would ask themselves if they had what it took to beat the incumbent, and if they thought they stood a chance, they would run.
This e******n is different in that no one is asking themselves if they can beat him. They know that NO ONE can beat him… in the process, it has simply become an opportunity to get some national recognition, which everyone wants to do.

What else could explain such a high number? Vox jumped on board to try to give a good explanation:

At this point in 1987, for example, nearing the end of Ronald Reagan’s second term, there were 13 candidates, including many whose names would occupy the highest difficulty tiers of any political trivia contest. Who remembers former Rep. Doug Applegate of Ohio? Probably not even the 25,000 people who v**ed for him in 1988.

Because it’s a big chapter in the Biden saga, many know he was a candidate that cycle before dropping out in September 1987, but few remember a remarkably qualified candidate who stayed in a few days longer: Rep. Patricia Schroeder of Colorado, an eight-term Congress member who was an expert on defense modernization as well as an early advocate for family leave and child care. Similar years with open Democratic fields include 1976 (15 announced candidates), 1992 (nine candidates), and 2008 (eight candidates).

But none of those fields reached 21 candidates. There may be a few other reasons that this cycle is even more attractive to candidates than similar situations in the past. Six candidates are sitting senators. That’s more than in any cycle since 1976, when five of the most distinguished and mostly admirable senators of the 20th century received just 15 percent of the Democratic primary v**e, combined.

Vox also mentioned that this e******n cycle is different because of money:

There’s also money — there’s just more of it than ever, more dollars and more donors. In the recent past, the biggest influence of money on p**********l e******ns involved its scarcity. The finance chair of former Rep. Dick Gephardt’s unsuccessful 1988 campaign told a researcher later, “Candidates don’t lose e******ns. They run out of money and can’t get their planes off the ground.”

Lucky for the Democrats, there are plenty of candidates who can now get their planes off the ground, and maybe even get to the point where their name is recognized.

Unfortunately, they’ll be remembered as one of those many people who had no chance against Trump.

SHAMBLES: Bombshell Poll Changed Everything About Dems Chances Of Defeat Trump In 2020
https://thebeardedpatriot.com/author/m-mcintosh/

President Donald Trump is in a great position going into the 2020 e******n, and now there’s even more proof.

According to a new poll from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, Democratic v**ers basically have no idea about the policies of the 25 Democratic candidates.

Their lack of interest screams out loud that there’s no point in researching Trump’s opponents because they already know the president’s winning policies and they’re working.

As reported by MSN:

Nearly two dozen Democratic p**********l candidates have crisscrossed the country for six months selling their vision for the United States. But, on the eve of the first debates in the campaign , a new poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research shows most Democratic v**ers haven’t fully tuned in.

Only 22% of Democrats registered to v**e say they know a lot about the candidates’ positions, while 62% say they know a little. And only 35% say they’re paying close attention to the campaign, with almost two-thirds saying they’re paying some or no attention.

Two thirds of Democratic v**ers are paying only some, or no attention? Two thirds?

If that’s not proof of a red wave coming, than I don’t know what is!

Another interesting piece of proof is just the astonishingly large number of people running.

In a normal e******n people would ask themselves if they had what it took to beat the incumbent, and if they thought they stood a chance, they would run.
This e******n is different in that no one is asking themselves if they can beat him. They know that NO ONE can beat him… in the process, it has simply become an opportunity to get some national recognition, which everyone wants to do.

What else could explain such a high number? Vox jumped on board to try to give a good explanation:

At this point in 1987, for example, nearing the end of Ronald Reagan’s second term, there were 13 candidates, including many whose names would occupy the highest difficulty tiers of any political trivia contest. Who remembers former Rep. Doug Applegate of Ohio? Probably not even the 25,000 people who v**ed for him in 1988.

Because it’s a big chapter in the Biden saga, many know he was a candidate that cycle before dropping out in September 1987, but few remember a remarkably qualified candidate who stayed in a few days longer: Rep. Patricia Schroeder of Colorado, an eight-term Congress member who was an expert on defense modernization as well as an early advocate for family leave and child care. Similar years with open Democratic fields include 1976 (15 announced candidates), 1992 (nine candidates), and 2008 (eight candidates).

But none of those fields reached 21 candidates. There may be a few other reasons that this cycle is even more attractive to candidates than similar situations in the past. Six candidates are sitting senators. That’s more than in any cycle since 1976, when five of the most distinguished and mostly admirable senators of the 20th century received just 15 percent of the Democratic primary v**e, combined.

Vox also mentioned that this e******n cycle is different because of money:

There’s also money — there’s just more of it than ever, more dollars and more donors. In the recent past, the biggest influence of money on p**********l e******ns involved its scarcity. The finance chair of former Rep. Dick Gephardt’s unsuccessful 1988 campaign told a researcher later, “Candidates don’t lose e******ns. They run out of money and can’t get their planes off the ground.”

Lucky for the Democrats, there are plenty of candidates who can now get their planes off the ground, and maybe even get to the point where their name is recognized.

Unfortunately, they’ll be remembered as one of those many people who had no chance against Trump.

Since your post is about a poll I will give you credit for not being one of he right wing nutters who refuse to believe polling data that doesn't tell them what they want to believe. I will also use a right wing source that has been in bed with trump since he was nominated. How focused people are on policy positions of primary candidates at this point is irrelevant. What is relevant is how they will v**e in the general e******n, here is the take from FOX news, ardent supporters of your I***t Pumpkinfuhrer.

Since your post is about a poll I will give you credit for not being one of he right wing nutters who refuse to believe polling data that doesn't tell them what they want to believe. I will also use a right wing source that has been in bed with trump since he was nominated. How focused people are on policy positions of primary candidates at this point is irrelevant. What is relevant is how they will v**e in the general e******n, here is the take from FOX news, ardent supporters of your I***t Pumpkinfuhrer.

Since your post is about a poll I will give you credit for not being one of he right wing nutters who refuse to believe polling data that doesn't tell them what they want to believe. I will also use a right wing source that has been in bed with trump since he was nominated. How focused people are on policy positions of primary candidates at this point is irrelevant. What is relevant is how they will v**e in the general e******n, here is the take from FOX news, ardent supporters of your I***t Pumpkinfuhrer.

"Since your post is about a poll I will give you credit for not being one of he right wing nutters who refuse to believe polling data that doesn't tell them what they want to believe...." - kevyn
Yep!!!
AND
The HildaBeast was winning by a landslide by your many "Polsters" in 2016.
LOLOLOLOL Get ready Kevy

I expect that these pollsters were plenty embarrassed by how wrong they were in 2016. Polls this far out are meaningless. My point is, that the pollsters are giving their brain dead Customers exactly what they want. Those poll consumers like Kevyn need to see Trump losing so that is what they are getting. If the polls are wrong, who cares ? When the e******n get close, then it will matter. The pollsters will not take the chance of embarrassing themselves again, so as the e******n looms in 2020, magically a shift in Trump's favor will take place. Until that time Kevyn can continue to live in his private fantasy world.

The fact that every Democrat seems to be beating Trump should tell anyone with a quarter brain, that the polls are not accurate. They can't all be beating him. Not with a great economy and no large wars going on. Add on the total Mueller Flop, and no way is Trump losing to every Dimocrat.