Excuse me for interrupting ,but,I called that being paid to do what as secretary of state,she is paid to do; carrying out her sworn duty,(at the behest of the president of the United States.)Also, utilizing their incumbency powers as President,and as Secretary of State-now what part of that do you still do not understand; they had police powers,they needed reasonable suspicion in order to accumulate evidence against and surveil Trump.Trump gave it to them by fraternizing with the enemy.Trump on the other hand was no more than a private citizen.Maybe as Clinton's opposition he had cause to dig up dirt on her,but without the aiding and albeiting by Russia.He certainly had no cause to investigate The President about the Birther issue,it had already been done by the appropriate people.

Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said there’s not much room for interpretation when it comes to President Donald Trump’s claim that he’d “listen” if a foreign power offered dirt on a political rival.

“He would be committing a felony,” Napolitano told host Shepard Smith on Thursday.
Trump this week said “there’s nothing wrong with listening” to dirt on an opponent, no matter what the source.

“They have information,” he said in an ABC interview. “I think I’d take it.”

Napolitano said that would be a crime, and there’s “no wiggle room” as the Federal E******n Commission has in previous cases decided that opposition research is considered a “thing of value.”
  
Under the law, a candidate can’t receive anything of value from a foreign national related to a U.S. e******n.

And that means Trump would be committing a crime.

“The president of the United States of America is prepared to commit a felony to get reelected,” he said. “That was my reaction, and it was not a happy one.”

Napolitano also said that whoever gives the president that info would also be committing a felony.

Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said there’s not much room for interpretation when it comes to President Donald Trump’s claim that he’d “listen” if a foreign power offered dirt on a political rival.

“He would be committing a felony,” Napolitano told host Shepard Smith on Thursday.
Trump this week said “there’s nothing wrong with listening” to dirt on an opponent, no matter what the source.

“They have information,” he said in an ABC interview. “I think I’d take it.”

Napolitano said that would be a crime, and there’s “no wiggle room” as the Federal E******n Commission has in previous cases decided that opposition research is considered a “thing of value.”
  
Under the law, a candidate can’t receive anything of value from a foreign national related to a U.S. e******n.

And that means Trump would be committing a crime.

“The president of the United States of America is prepared to commit a felony to get reelected,” he said. “That was my reaction, and it was not a happy one.”

Napolitano also said that whoever gives the president that info would also be committing a felony.

And just as soon as we're done prosecuting everyone involved in the DNC/Clinton Team/Obama administration/FBI/CIA/etc who played any part in the illegal spying on the Trump campaign/the creation and use of the Russian Dossier/the fraudulent FISA warrant applications/etc. we'll get after President Trump for...wait...what...oh, he just gave an answer to a hypothetical question asked by a Clinton toadie in order to try to gin up another controversy, so he didn't actually do anything prosecutable. Well as long as we got that other stuff done, let's call it a day.