One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
This is the Big Freaking Deal
Page <<first <prev 7 of 11 next> last>>
Jun 15, 2019 13:48:21   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
rumitoid wrote:
So tiring. Can't you guys hold your spleen for one minute? Do you really have to debase yourself with spewing insults? Just make a legitimate argument. Sorry, that was cruel.


Hold our spleen? I think that would involve pain, and blood, and stuff! Mine is fine where it's at! Somewhere in my torso, I assume.

Reply
Jun 15, 2019 14:02:07   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Still living in a fantasy world I see!





rumitoid wrote:
In effect what you are saying is that Trump should have known better than to say he would accept dirt on political opponents after all the fuss over the Steele Dossier and Trump Jr's meeting. The fact such an act was criminal should been seared in his mind. Yet for wh**ever reason, he foolishly said he would commit such a crime. Long or short term memory loss? Gross inattention? Blatant egotistical disregard? Who knows, but there was a serious brain failure.

Reply
Jun 15, 2019 14:10:00   #
rumitoid
 
archie bunker wrote:
Hold our spleen? I think that would involve pain, and blood, and stuff! Mine is fine where it's at! Somewhere in my torso, I assume.


That is good to hear. Best place for it, people say.

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2019 14:26:34   #
Reality
 
rumitoid wrote:
The question was about accepting "dirt on political opponents," which Trump answered yes to, and not about something "bad is going to happen." Two distinctly different scenarios. The former a crime and the other civic duty.


What do you call the Steele dossier then?

Reply
Jun 15, 2019 14:57:18   #
Ricktloml
 
Fit2BTied wrote:
And just as soon as we're done prosecuting everyone involved in the DNC/Clinton Team/Obama administration/FBI/CIA/etc who played any part in the illegal spying on the Trump campaign/the creation and use of the Russian Dossier/the fraudulent FISA warrant applications/etc. we'll get after President Trump for...wait...what...oh, he just gave an answer to a hypothetical question asked by a Clinton toadie in order to try to gin up another controversy, so he didn't actually do anything prosecutable. Well as long as we got that other stuff done, let's call it a day.
And just as soon as we're done prosecuting everyon... (show quote)


So a set-up hypothetical question is now grounds for endless conjecture. Remember Stephanopolis did the same thing with that weasel Romney about birth control. This is another false narrative manufactured by the media, (which is now the open propaganda wing of the Democrat/socialist Party.) What is starting to come out in released documents, e-mails, text messages, sworn testimony and FOIAs is Obama, his operatives and appointees, Hillary, the DNC and foreign intelligence operatives connected to Obama's appointees tried to repeatedly get candidate Trump to accept what they told his campaign staff was dirt from Russia or Russian agents...and he wouldn't take what was offered. Hillary, the DNC and their collaborators in the media, with the willing help and backing of Obama actually did EXACTLY, (and worse,) is what they are trying to accuse President Trump of (thinking about, since he has done NONE of this.) It is one false narrative after another. Their god Mueller didn't deliver, and it looks like a lot of really ugly t***h is going to see the light of day, so the Democrat/socialist Party attack dogs have to keep the base riled up with more misinformation.

Reply
Jun 15, 2019 15:52:56   #
Fit2BTied Loc: Texas
 
Ricktloml wrote:
So a set-up hypothetical question is now grounds for endless conjecture. Remember Stephanopolis did the same thing with that weasel Romney about birth control. This is another false narrative manufactured by the media, (which is now the open propaganda wing of the Democrat/socialist Party.) What is starting to come out in released documents, e-mails, text messages, sworn testimony and FOIAs is Obama, his operatives and appointees, Hillary, the DNC and foreign intelligence operatives connected to Obama's appointees tried to repeatedly get candidate Trump to accept what they told his campaign staff was dirt from Russia or Russian agents...and he wouldn't take what was offered. Hillary, the DNC and their collaborators in the media, with the willing help and backing of Obama actually did EXACTLY, (and worse,) is what they are trying to accuse President Trump of (thinking about, since he has done NONE of this.) It is one false narrative after another. Their god Mueller didn't deliver, and it looks like a lot of really ugly t***h is going to see the light of day, so the Democrat/socialist Party attack dogs have to keep the base riled up with more misinformation.
So a set-up hypothetical question is now grounds f... (show quote)
That's a big 10-4. Now if the currently assembled team has the nads to take this all the way we may finally see justice. I pray about a lot of stuff and this is in my top 5 right now! America deserves this! And so do the true conspirators!

Reply
Jun 15, 2019 18:31:35   #
rumitoid
 
Ricktloml wrote:
So a set-up hypothetical question is now grounds for endless conjecture. Remember Stephanopolis did the same thing with that weasel Romney about birth control. This is another false narrative manufactured by the media, (which is now the open propaganda wing of the Democrat/socialist Party.) What is starting to come out in released documents, e-mails, text messages, sworn testimony and FOIAs is Obama, his operatives and appointees, Hillary, the DNC and foreign intelligence operatives connected to Obama's appointees tried to repeatedly get candidate Trump to accept what they told his campaign staff was dirt from Russia or Russian agents...and he wouldn't take what was offered. Hillary, the DNC and their collaborators in the media, with the willing help and backing of Obama actually did EXACTLY, (and worse,) is what they are trying to accuse President Trump of (thinking about, since he has done NONE of this.) It is one false narrative after another. Their god Mueller didn't deliver, and it looks like a lot of really ugly t***h is going to see the light of day, so the Democrat/socialist Party attack dogs have to keep the base riled up with more misinformation.
So a set-up hypothetical question is now grounds f... (show quote)


Talk about fruit loops BS. Give a source.

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2019 19:05:50   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Go back under your rock.




rumitoid wrote:
Talk about fruit loops BS. Give a source.

Reply
Jun 15, 2019 19:10:18   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
rumitoid wrote:
Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said there’s not much room for interpretation when it comes to President Donald Trump’s claim that he’d “listen” if a foreign power offered dirt on a political rival.

“He would be committing a felony,” Napolitano told host Shepard Smith on Thursday.
Trump this week said “there’s nothing wrong with listening” to dirt on an opponent, no matter what the source.

“They have information,” he said in an ABC interview. “I think I’d take it.”

Napolitano said that would be a crime, and there’s “no wiggle room” as the Federal E******n Commission has in previous cases decided that opposition research is considered a “thing of value.”
  
Under the law, a candidate can’t receive anything of value from a foreign national related to a U.S. e******n.

And that means Trump would be committing a crime.

“The president of the United States of America is prepared to commit a felony to get reelected,” he said. “That was my reaction, and it was not a happy one.”

Napolitano also said that whoever gives the president that info would also be committing a felony.
Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano... (show quote)


Sooo let Trump be warned of a possible set up.
Just refer the possible dip-s**t to the FBI.

Reply
Jun 15, 2019 19:12:58   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Ricktloml wrote:
So a set-up hypothetical question is now grounds for endless conjecture. Remember Stephanopolis did the same thing with that weasel Romney about birth control. This is another false narrative manufactured by the media, (which is now the open propaganda wing of the Democrat/socialist Party.) What is starting to come out in released documents, e-mails, text messages, sworn testimony and FOIAs is Obama, his operatives and appointees, Hillary, the DNC and foreign intelligence operatives connected to Obama's appointees tried to repeatedly get candidate Trump to accept what they told his campaign staff was dirt from Russia or Russian agents...and he wouldn't take what was offered. Hillary, the DNC and their collaborators in the media, with the willing help and backing of Obama actually did EXACTLY, (and worse,) is what they are trying to accuse President Trump of (thinking about, since he has done NONE of this.) It is one false narrative after another. Their god Mueller didn't deliver, and it looks like a lot of really ugly t***h is going to see the light of day, so the Democrat/socialist Party attack dogs have to keep the base riled up with more misinformation.
So a set-up hypothetical question is now grounds f... (show quote)


A warning?
Take it directly to the FBI; assuming the FBI has been cleaned up.


Reply
Jun 15, 2019 19:22:58   #
Carol Kelly
 
rumitoid wrote:
Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said there’s not much room for interpretation when it comes to President Donald Trump’s claim that he’d “listen” if a foreign power offered dirt on a political rival.

“He would be committing a felony,” Napolitano told host Shepard Smith on Thursday.
Trump this week said “there’s nothing wrong with listening” to dirt on an opponent, no matter what the source.

“They have information,” he said in an ABC interview. “I think I’d take it.”

Napolitano said that would be a crime, and there’s “no wiggle room” as the Federal E******n Commission has in previous cases decided that opposition research is considered a “thing of value.”
  
Under the law, a candidate can’t receive anything of value from a foreign national related to a U.S. e******n.

And that means Trump would be committing a crime.

“The president of the United States of America is prepared to commit a felony to get reelected,” he said. “That was my reaction, and it was not a happy one.”

Napolitano also said that whoever gives the president that info would also be committing a felony.
Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano... (show quote)


Don’t like or trust Shep Smith or Napolitano.

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2019 19:23:20   #
Carol Kelly
 
eagleye13 wrote:
A warning?
Take it directly to the FBI; assuming the FBI has been cleaned up.

A warning? br Take it directly to the FBI; assumin... (show quote)


Correct.

Reply
Jun 15, 2019 19:39:25   #
dongreen76
 
Reality wrote:
What do you call the Steele dossier then?


Excuse me for interrupting ,but,I called that being paid to do what as secretary of state,she is paid to do; carrying out her sworn duty,(at the behest of the president of the United States.)Also, utilizing their incumbency powers as President,and as Secretary of State-now what part of that do you still do not understand; they had police powers,they needed reasonable suspicion in order to accumulate evidence against and surveil Trump.Trump gave it to them by fraternizing with the enemy.Trump on the other hand was no more than a private citizen.Maybe as Clinton's opposition he had cause to dig up dirt on her,but without the aiding and albeiting by Russia.He certainly had no cause to investigate The President about the Birther issue,it had already been done by the appropriate people.

Reply
Jun 15, 2019 19:52:10   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
dongreen76 wrote:
Excuse me for interrupting ,but,I called that being paid to do what as secretary of state,she is paid to do; carrying out her sworn duty,(at the behest of the president of the United States.)Also, utilizing their incumbency powers as President,and as Secretary of State-now what part of that do you still do not understand; they had police powers,they needed reasonable suspicion in order to accumulate evidence against and surveil Trump.Trump gave it to them by fraternizing with the enemy.Trump on the other hand was no more than a private citizen.Maybe as Clinton's opposition he had cause to dig up dirt on her,but without the aiding and albeiting by Russia.He certainly had no cause to investigate The President about the Birther issue,it had already been done by the appropriate people.
Excuse me for interrupting ,but,I called that bein... (show quote)


Reality wrote:
What do you call the Steele dossier then?

Please answer the question, Don.

Reply
Jun 15, 2019 20:33:12   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
proud republican wrote:
So tell me how do you relate info to FBI,if you dont listen first???....Presidents talk to foreign governments all the time, are they supposed to report it to FBI after every single phone call???.This doesn't make sense!!!


Don't worry. They are listening to everything. FBI, NSA, DIA, CIA, MI6, GRU, etc.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.