Russia Doesn't Care Who Wins An E******n, It's About The Chaos They Create (Page 3): Call him a rino all you like but he is 100% Republican, but yes, he is a snake and all for high...

Common_Sense_Matters

Blade_Runner wrote:

I don't have any alt-right sources. I wouldn't even know where to look for one.

Who give a flying fk what Mitch "the snake" McConnell would consider as partisan politics? He's an establishment RINO as partisan as they come.

McConnell's wife, Elaine Chao, was born in Taiwan. She is the Secretary of T***sportation.

McConnell’s Wife Gave Him a Special Ree******n Present: $78 Million in Federal Funding

NYT Confirms Schweizer ‘Secret Empires’ Bombshell on Elaine Chao and Mitch McConnell’s China Ties

A trove of more than 800 pages of emails sheds new light on the working relationship between T***sportation Secretary Elaine Chao and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, one of the most potent power couples in Washington — including their dealings with McConnell supporters from their home state of Kentucky.

Chao has met at least 10 times with politicians and business leaders from the state in response to requests from McConnell’s office, according to documents provided to Politico by the watchdog group American Oversight. In some cases, those people later received what they were hoping for from Chao’s department, including infrastructure grants, the designation of an interstate highway and assistance in getting state funds for a highway project — although the documents don’t indicate that the meetings led to those outcomes.

The records also do not show how frequently Chao has met with people from outside Kentucky, a state her husband has represented in the Senate since 1985, or how readily she has responded to similar requests from other lawmakers. But at least a dozen of the emails show McConnell’s staff acting as a conduit between Chao and Kentucky political figures or business leaders, some of whom previously have had relationships with the couple.

In one email from Feb. 2, 2017, just days after Chao was sworn in, McConnell’s state director emailed a Chao lieutenant asking the secretary to meet with maritime industry lobbyist Jim Adams about proposed changes to “Buy American, Hire American” requirements for offshore drilling equipment. The lobbyist and his wife, a Kentucky state senator who used to work for McConnell, donated $1,500 to McConnell’s 2014 ree******n campaign, according to Federal E******n Commission filings.

“The Secretary knows them both well,” McConnell state director Terry Carmack wrote to Todd Inman, who at the time was director of operations at the Department of T***sportation. Chao met with the lobbyist the next month, according to her calendar.

I don't have any alt-right sources. I wouldn't eve... (show quote)

Call him a rino all you like but he is 100% Republican, but yes, he is a snake and all for high level corruption.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Common_Sense_Matters wrote:

Call him a rino all you like but he is 100% Republican, but yes, he is a snake and all for high level corruption.

There is a big difference between being a Republican and a Republican In Name Only.

Mikeyavelli

Trooper745 wrote:

I love it!!!! POTUS Trump scares the living crap out of you silly wacko liberal hypocrites, ... even if he's not in office. I hope he continues to haunt your dreams for the rest of your life.

What scares the kommiecrats is us; the Trump supporters, those of us who love his blunt approach to t***h and his unabashed love for America. The kommiecrats see that nothing they can do will make us change our minds about Trump despite having the media and most of Washington DC working to remove Trump from office. We are unwavering and so is Trump. And the Trump movement is spreading across Europe and Asia.
Even if the kommiecrats are successful in removing Trump from office, the movement continues. A sovereign prosperous powerful America, exactly what the kommiecrats do not want.

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

Common_Sense_Matters wrote:

Still you, I never suggested that Trump was on the ticket in 2018, it was only your feeble mind that made such an asinine connection. They are called "mid-term" e******ns for a reason, they fall "mid-term" of p**********l terms. Think before you post, posting i***tic statements like your's only make YOU look stupid, NOT the other person.

I give up.

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

Common_Sense_Matters wrote:

Oh, I never said he stands NO CHANCE of winning, merely that he stands little chance of winning.

Compared to what?

Common_Sense_Matters wrote:

He has shown us that he doesn't have what it takes to even make a competent president much less a great one so the intelligent v**e will likely go to his opponent, whomever that may be.

Oh my. All that wining and he's still not a 'competent' President? Wh**ever shall we do? You seem to have a very low opinion of what constitutes 'intelligence' among the American e*****rate.

Common_Sense_Matters wrote:

IF he manages to win, against all odds, it will likely be a lame duck term with both the House and Senate in Democratic hands.

Mmm-hmm. President Trump goes back to the White House and the same e*****rate sends all Democrats to Congress. Of course they will. You really do think they're pretty dumb, don't you"

Common_Sense_Matters wrote:

Trump refuses to compromise and as such, anything Congress puts forth, he would veto

Oh, right. Like he has already. How many times has he vetoed legislation? Besides the obvious socialist mandates, of course. Just curious, you understand...

Common_Sense_Matters wrote:

and they won't give him anything he wants so nothing would be done for another four years.

Well, now you're giving the game away. You're right. of course. If it makes even the slightest bit of sense, it ain't happening, period. Border security - no way! Healthcare reform - Kiss my lily white ass! Infrastructure - Hahahaha! I*****l i*******t legalization - Not on my watch! The list is long and frustrating. But that's because if any of this stuff passes, President Trump is delivering on his campaign promises and that's a definite no-no.

Common_Sense_Matters wrote:

Do we really want that? Of course there IS the possibility that there will be enough v**es in Congress to override a veto, but that would likely require bipartisan support.

Well! Just a second ago you were doubting the survival of a single Trump v**e in Congress and now you're begging republicans for 'bipartisan' support. Newsflash! Socialism is not a bipartisan issue, dumbass!

Common_Sense_Matters

Larry the Legend wrote:

Well! Just a second ago you were doubting the survival of a single Trump v**e in Congress and now you're begging republicans for 'bipartisan' support. Newsflash! Socialism is not a bipartisan issue, dumbass!

What happened to:

Larry the Legend wrote:

I give up.

Doesn't that mean "conversation over"? This discussion can last all the way up to e******n day and beyond as one side either b***hes and whines or gloats. It isn't that important of a conversation so I do not intend to discuss it all the way to e******n day and beyond.

Well then, there is another way to end it.

I wrote:

I give up.

Will that end this conversation?

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

Common_Sense_Matters wrote:

Will that end this conversation?

Consider it done.

markc Loc: Tennessee

woodguru wrote:

I'm going to bet that Dems are going to be offered... (show quote)

Need to bring back the Fairness Doctrine that Reagan decimated for the benefit of the wealthy and update it for the tech world.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2018/04/17/want-stop-f**e-news-reinstate-fairness-doctrine/BpMw4D3s9qLrDwA2geLywN/story.html?outputType=amp

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

markc wrote:

Need to bring back the Fairness Doctrine that Reag... (show quote)

Yeah, because certain outlets who tend to provide an exclusively unpopular political ideology are going under and their voices must be carried by those who dare to have a more popular and logical viewpoint.

Go away, troll.

Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

woodguru wrote:

I'm going to bet that Dems are going to be offered... (show quote)

That is what the Russians did in the last P**********l e******n.

Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

PeterS wrote:

What is your argument Blade? This was investigated... (show quote)

Who was the President when the Russians tried to attack our e******ns? Obama and his cronies didn't do anything about it for about 2 years.

Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

woodguru wrote:

We will feel the damage he has done for the rest of our lives with his systematic ending of everything he could lay his hands on with truly single minded agency heads. Our standing in the world as the leader of democracy may never be fixed. He has enabled Russia to get a leg up financially where we had broken them and kept them broke.

I suppose telling the rest of Europe not to buy oil from Russia but buy it from the U. S. A. wasn't what President Trump did. What rock have you been hiding under. Who sold offensive weapons to the country of Ukraine? Once again that was Trump. How is that helping Russia? You are like most progressives that have TDS so bad you have lost all common and logical sense.

Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

Common_Sense_Matters wrote:

Timeline seems pretty clear to me. You asserted th... (show quote)

The Democrats only won the House because they had about 35 seats vacated by the Republicans because they were so dishearten by the Democrats not wanting to get anything done in Congress.

markc Loc: Tennessee

Larry the Legend wrote:

Yeah, because certain outlets who tend to provide an exclusively unpopular political ideology are going under and their voices must be carried by those who dare to have a more popular and logical viewpoint.

Go away, troll.

Hahaha, news organizations or in the case that of which you evidently follow, propaganda entertainment organizations, are not “outlets” like a department store where you pick out what color and size you like. The t***h hurts.

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

markc wrote:

Hahaha, news organizations or in the case that of which you evidently follow, propaganda entertainment organizations, are not “outlets” like a department store where you pick out what color and size you like.

I see. And what 'propaganda entertainment organization' do I evidently 'follow'? I'll be 'entertained' by your answer, no doubt. Actually, news outlets do tailor their choice of news stories to suit their targeted audience. Some people are more interested in business news, others may be more interested in sporting news, or stock market news, and so on. I have not expressed a preference so am somewhat mystified by your assertion that I 'follow' a 'propaganda entertainment organization'. Clearly 'propaganda entertainment' is not news... (By the way, what the hell is it?)

markc wrote:

The t***h hurts.

Sometimes. "Your Mom died." That's news that hurts, if it's true. If it's not, then it's a play on another person's emotions and will no doubt elicit a less than friendly response when the (happy?) t***h is discovered. I suppose that finding out that you've been lied to is almost always a hurtful experience, unless you're used to it, then maybe not so much.

I find the t***h, even when negative in nature, is not so much a 'hurt' as a warning, or in some cases, a hint of the future. Take the latest attacks on those two tankers in the Straight of Hormuz. War is in the air, guaranteed; regardless of who did the damage or why. There may be misleading stories, or even outright lies along the way, but men are going to die. That's the t***h. Does it hurt?