I'm sure that some conservatives violate guidelines. However, ( I can't even think of his name) this vet was stating his political opinion, and his channel was deleted with no warning and no offer of the money he spent building his Page. The same happened to Diamond and Silk, as they testified in front of congress. Eventually, they got their webpage back. Here's another;
Charles Johnson, who’s a conservative gadfly, is currently suing Twitter because it admitted that he didn’t violate Twitter’s policies; Twitter just wanted to get rid of him. It’s good to know that if you’re conservative, you can spend years building up an audience on Twitter and the liberals at Twitter can arbitrarily throw you off their service because they decide they don’t like your views.
And another;
Dennis Prager’s PragerU is suing YouTube for exactly that reason. Just to give you an example of the sort of content YouTube thinks is over-the-line, here are some of the videos it demonetized: Why America Must Lead, The Ten Commandments: Do Not Murder, Why Did America Fight the Korean War, and The World’s Most Persecuted Minority: Christians. Of course, YouTube would claim that it’s not censoring the videos because it didn’t take them down. However, people are not going to spend large amounts of time and money putting together high-production-value videos if they’re not going to be allowed to make money on those videos because of their political beliefs.
Here's the response to Facebook's censorship on USA Today;
A joint statement this week from more than 60 conservatives, including former attorney general Edwin Meese and Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, demanded that Facebook and other tech giants "rectify their credibility with the conservative movement" by explaining why content is taken down and accounts deleted and by including more conservative groups on its list of advisers.
"Social media censorship and online restriction of conservatives and their organizations have reached a crisis level," the statement read. "Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s hearings on Capitol Hill only served to draw attention to how widespread this problem has become."
"I think it's wholly right that conservatives want to be treated fairly and enjoy the benefits of the service like anyone else," Kitchen told USA TODAY. "If Facebook is doing a reasonable job of that now, it’s up to Facebook to make that case. If there are systemic problems, they should deal with that, not only to do well as a company, but also for the sake of consumers to provide the best product possible."

The growing chorus of conservatives demanding answers from Facebook comes after the disclosure that 87 million people had their data improperly obtained by Cambridge Analytica drew bipartisan condemnation.
Facebook IS a company and it sells a social business...having a bias against one group of people constitutes discrimination. Face book reaches SO many people that if only liberals are allowed to voice their political views, then that's as much e******n tampering as anything that the Russians were accused of.
I want to hear liberal views as much as conservative. If you don't hear both sides, how can you know what the debate is really about?
I'll check this guy out anyway cause I'm not saying either one of us is correct.
The main point about this thread is that at least SOME of the $24,000,000 he has taken in, IS getting spent building the wall ( a small section but evidentially important). I understand that there is also other construction going on, funded by this money. We'll see what else comes up about it. Deal?