trucksterbud wrote:
Where do you get this 'better than thou' stuff from rumi….??? Do you know anything about "War Criminals"...??? What defines a war criminal in your depraved little mind..??
The wars we fight now are not like WWII or WWI, or even the Vietnam War.
The enemy could be anybody. Maybe one of our servicemen shot up some locals. Maybe he shot up some children taking out the perceived enemy. In the present day fighting the Taliban, Al-Queda, or radical Islam there is no way to know who the enemy may be. Get off your intellectual 'better than thou' stool. I don't recall ANYBODY stating what these servicemen or women were accused of.
War isn't pretty butthead. Get used to it, or maybe get out of your little fantasy bubble. Did you consider that maybe.... just maybe... Trump has been briefed on extenuating circumstances, that maybe an otherwise outstanding military service was tainted by a bad choice one time, and maybe.....just maybe, Trump and some of the military advisors feel that the particular service member should be pardoned.
I don't see where its your call, where its your decision to make accusations, or its your decision to decide whether or not the country is worse of for it.
Maybe we should say the country is worse off just because you're here and post on OPP....
Maybe we should point out the level of self-righteousness you have. Who are you to judge ANYBODY who has been to war..??
Where do you get this 'better than thou' stuff fro... (
show quote)
As per stars and stripes
OPINION
Trump is wrong to pardon war criminals
By WAITMAN WADE BEORN | Special to The Washington Post | Published: May 10, 2019
In early 2003, as a cavalry officer, I stood in front of my scout platoon at dusk after a long day preparing to deploy to Iraq. I spoke with them about the law of war and how they should treat civilians when we got into theater. It wasn’t a long conversation, but I felt that giving clear guidance about what was acceptable — and not acceptable — was important. They should treat the civilians as they would neighbors, I told them. Soldiers take most seriously the things their leadership makes most serious.
On Monday, President Donald Trump pardoned the convicted war criminal Michael Behenna, who, while serving as an Army first lieutenant, had murdered Ali Mansur Mohamed, an unarmed, naked Iraqi, by shooting him in the head and chest. Making a specious claim of self-defense, Behenna argued that Mansur threw a piece of concrete at him and “stood up like he’s coming at me.” And so he neutralized this threat, a naked man, already released by the Army. Behenna was supposed to be returning Mansur home to his village. A military court convicted Behenna of unpremeditated murder. American soldiers testified against him. The military court of appeals and a review panel upheld that conviction, though he was paroled early, in 2014.
Even before pardoning Behenna, Trump demonstrated a disturbing flippancy toward war crimes. He has repeatedly expressed support for former Navy SEAL Edward Gallagher, another alleged war criminal. Gallagher’s own men told investigators that he had, according to The New York Times, “shot a girl in a flower-print hijab who was walking with other girls on the riverbank.” In 2017, Gallagher walked up to a 15-year-old prisoner of war and “stabbed the wounded teenager several times in the neck and once in the chest with his hunting knife, k*****g him.” He then texted images of his “k**l” to friends. Even in the tightknit Special Operations community, fellow SEALs were horrified and repeatedly reported Gallagher’s behavior until charges were brought. He faces court-martial at the end of the month. Trump tweeted that Gallagher would be given better conditions in confinement “in honor of his past service,” an honor many would say he threw away long ago.
Trump has also publicly supported Maj. Matt Golsteyn, who is charged with premeditated murder in the shooting of an unarmed man and the burning of his body in Afghanistan. “I will be reviewing the case of a ‘U.S. Military hero,’ ” the president tweeted.
I know it sounds old and tired but our miltary have to be trusted. The rules of engagements have to be followed. Even if those same rules get more members k**led. The people who are under your direction take their clues from you if you don't give a damn do you think they will? Yeah war is ugly and things do happened. But if a close knit group is outraged at what a member did ,does that member deserve respect? At times we are not in country because we want to be there. We are in country because we are asked to be there. How you would like it if someone came into your home and disrespected everything you have? And yes there are people in that same country that don't want us.