One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
New Preamble to the Constitution?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
May 25, 2019 12:07:19   #
America 1 Loc: South Miami
 
Morgan wrote:
Yes, you exactly right don it is about our society conducting in a higher manner than the Ayn Rand survival of the fittest. We all age and become not as able as we once served but we've contributed our entire adult lives and having programs instituted to help them is the morally conscious thing to do, and the certainly are not hare-brained.

What is hare-brained is creating tariffs, to then only bail out farmers with subsidies.


Morgan,
China exports to the US $540 billion.
The US exports to China $120 billion.
Does that seem just a little lopsided to you?
In addition
U.S. companies that can't compete with cheap Chinese goods must either lower their costs or go out of business. Many businesses reduce their costs by outsourcing jobs to China or India. Outsourcing adds to U.S. unemployment. Other industries have just dried up. U.S. manufacturing, as measured by the number of jobs, declined 34% between 1998 and 2010. As these industries declined, so has U.S. competitiveness in the global marketplace.

Reply
May 25, 2019 13:57:39   #
debeda
 
America 1 wrote:
Morgan,
China exports to the US $540 billion.
The US exports to China $120 billion.
Does that seem just a little lopsided to you?
In addition
U.S. companies that can't compete with cheap Chinese goods must either lower their costs or go out of business. Many businesses reduce their costs by outsourcing jobs to China or India. Outsourcing adds to U.S. unemployment. Other industries have just dried up. U.S. manufacturing, as measured by the number of jobs, declined 34% between 1998 and 2010. As these industries declined, so has U.S. competitiveness in the global marketplace.
Morgan, br China exports to the US $540 billion. b... (show quote)



Reply
May 25, 2019 16:03:01   #
Mr. Rogers
 
Socialism? Open link.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation+13&version=KJV

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2019 18:59:16   #
cbpat1
 
EmilyD wrote:
The following has been attributed to Lewis Napper, a Jackson, Mississippi computer programmer. He didn't expect his essay -- a tart 10-point list of "rights" Americans don't have -- to become an internet legend. Here's what he has to say:

"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more r**ts, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great- grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt-ridden, delusional. We hold these t***hs to be self-evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights:

ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.

ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone -- not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc.; but the world is full of dummies, and probably always will be.

ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful; do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.

ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes.

ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested in public health care.

ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or k**l someone, don't be surprised if the rest of us want to see you get the blue juice.

ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, c***t, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure.

ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful.

ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an overabundance of i***tic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.

ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don't care where you came from, English is our language. Learn it!

ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's history or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution. The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of our heritage and history, sorry if you are uncomfortable with it."
The following has been attributed to Lewis Napper,... (show quote)




Beautifully said ✊✊🇺🇸🇺🇸🙏🙏✌️✌️

Reply
May 25, 2019 19:05:05   #
cbpat1
 
dongreen76 wrote:
So by that line of stinking,the old ,the handicapped,the weak ,the infirmed, no one should bare responsibility for them, to take the issue further, there should not be an argument about a******n,and people of your political persuasion are not being phony when you say you are pro-life, after all you contend that one human bares no responsibility for another.Then you are one whom as I said does not agree with Abraham Lincoln,whom claims every man has rights that cannot be refuted.Hence, parents bare no responsibility to their off spring.Some people think these are the chacrateristics that makes us a higher life form,that also distinguishes from lesser animals.Those stupid ass Hitler people think like that."get rid of the mongrels"!
So by that line of stinking,the old ,the handicapp... (show quote)




Don’t be ridiculous and twist what was said into something that was not intended. Your just trying to tear down something that made perfectly good common sense. Your reference to Hitler shows your insincerity and your lack of character.

Reply
May 25, 2019 22:08:06   #
EmilyD
 
cbpat1 wrote:
Don’t be ridiculous and twist what was said into something that was not intended. Your just trying to tear down something that made perfectly good common sense. Your reference to Hitler shows your insincerity and your lack of character.

I suspect that dongreen thinks that unwanted babies who are murdered because they are an "inconvenience" are equal to mongrels.

Reply
May 25, 2019 22:30:59   #
Big dog
 
EmilyD wrote:
I suspect that dongreen thinks that unwanted babies who are murdered because they are an "inconvenience" are equal to mongrels.


They make excuses to commit murder and allow the drinking of the unborn’s blood. Evil lurkes all around us !

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2019 22:32:55   #
cbpat1
 
EmilyD wrote:
I suspect that dongreen thinks that unwanted babies who are murdered because they are an "inconvenience" are equal to mongrels.



I would agree with you on that. But the liberals are the party of compassion and e******y for everyone, unless that is, if you are an unborn, or in some cases, a newly born baby or a conservative. Then you deserve to die.

Reply
May 25, 2019 22:36:04   #
Big dog
 
cbpat1 wrote:
I would agree with you on that. But the liberals are the party of compassion and e******y for everyone, unless that is, if you are an unborn, or in some cases, a newly born baby or a conservative. Then you deserve to die.


👍

Reply
May 25, 2019 23:00:17   #
EmilyD
 
Big dog wrote:
They make excuses to commit murder and allow the drinking of the unborn’s blood. Evil lurkes all around us !

It is evil. I thought the law would protect innocent human babies until they could speak for themselves. Roe v Wade closed that option for the poor little things and it was a colossal mistake....and it has allowed the murder of millions of babies....way more than the Holocaust. Allowing the murder of babies because it is an inconvenience is wrong..on many many levels.

Reply
May 25, 2019 23:20:28   #
Big dog
 
EmilyD wrote:
It is evil. I thought the law would protect innocent human babies until they could speak for themselves. Roe v Wade closed that option for the poor little things and it was a colossal mistake....and it has allowed the murder of millions of babies....way more than the Holocaust. Allowing the murder of babies because it is an inconvenience is wrong..on many many levels.


There’s rumors about the dementiacrats eating these aborted babies and drinking their blood.

Reply
 
 
May 26, 2019 01:36:12   #
EmilyD
 
Big dog wrote:
They make excuses to commit murder and allow the drinking of the unborn’s blood. Evil lurkes all around us !

That is extreme, and scary to look at it that way.

Reply
May 26, 2019 03:04:04   #
Ricktloml
 
EmilyD wrote:
It is evil. I thought the law would protect innocent human babies until they could speak for themselves. Roe v Wade closed that option for the poor little things and it was a colossal mistake....and it has allowed the murder of millions of babies....way more than the Holocaust. Allowing the murder of babies because it is an inconvenience is wrong..on many many levels.


These babies condemned to death for the crime of conception, should get to appeal their sentences for 5-15 years like every other one of the condemned

Reply
May 26, 2019 12:10:26   #
debeda
 
Ricktloml wrote:
These babies condemned to death for the crime of conception, should get to appeal their sentences for 5-15 years like every other one of the condemned



Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.