One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
At what point are we "beings?"
Page <<first <prev 4 of 21 next> last>>
May 18, 2019 11:42:52   #
whitnebrat Loc: In the wilds of Oregon
 
susanblange wrote:
We are both a soul (body) and a spirit. The body is mortal in all cases, but the spirit can be eternal. The Hebrew word for spirit is ruach, and it means "breath"" (inside the body), and "wind" (outside the body). It's also called a "ghost". We do not have a spirit until we are born and take that first breath. Miscarried, stillborn, and aborted babies do not go to Heaven or Hell because they have no spirit.

If the spirit is eternal, does this correlate to the Buddhist concept of karma and reincarnation? It seems that your statement implies this ... just curious.

Reply
May 18, 2019 11:56:28   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
lindajoy wrote:
Yup your a meta physical kinda guy... Meant with much respect for your intriguing posts...

I thought I did address when the “ being begun”..

The brain can survive for 4 minutes without oxygen, then brain cells start dying, right??? So if there is no heartbeat, the heart is not contracting, the blood is not circulating through the body, and there is no oxygen supply, right??Other tissues and organs can live longer without oxygen but without the brain it isn not able to function.. All commands gone..

The heart is the functioning aspect of survival of the body is it not??

Impregnation is fertilization which brings about the embryo, fetus, child etc, right?? How can we not define the heart when the cells begin forming it is the blood and oxygen of the heart that develops, right, or no??
Yup your a meta physical kinda guy... Meant with m... (show quote)


You might have, I'm between patients and not paying full attention. I would point out that the heart can continue in many people even after the brain is dead, with zero brain activity. But yes, with out the heart, it all dies, but without the brain life can continue even if the individual is actually gone.

Reply
May 18, 2019 11:57:44   #
susanblange Loc: USA
 
whitnebrat wrote:
If the spirit is eternal, does this correlate to the Buddhist concept of karma and reincarnation? It seems that your statement implies this ... just curious.


If there is an incarnation (of God), there can also be reincarnation. People who go to Heaven and become Angels have a choice to live again on earth and to be reincarnated. There are two that have been kicked out of Heaven and reincarnated. They are Adam (Satan), and Jesus (Lucifer) who was Satan's counterfeit messiah. Lucifer means "morning star" and that is who Jesus claims to be. Revelation 22:16. Reincarnation is a fact and there is some T***h in all religions. I practice and eclectic mix.

Reply
 
 
May 18, 2019 12:03:34   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
susanblange wrote:
We are both a soul (body) and a spirit. The body is mortal in all cases, but the spirit can be eternal. The Hebrew word for spirit is ruach, and it means "breath"" (inside the body), and "wind" (outside the body). It's also called a "ghost". We do not have a spirit until we are born and take that first breath. Miscarried, stillborn, and aborted babies do not go to Heaven or Hell because they have no spirit.


This is a contradiction

You say: The Hebrew word for spirit is ruach, and it means "breath"" (inside the body), and "wind" (outside the body).

Then you say: We do not have a spirit until we are born and take that first breath.

Babies do not breath in the womb until almost the end of the pregnancy.. They are supplied oxygen through the umbilical cord..

Please excuse my ignorance over this comment: Miscarried, stillborn, and aborted babies do not go to Heaven or Hell because they have no spirit.[/quote]

Must respectfully disagree, from God this soul and spirit came and when that soul/spirit leaves it returns to God..Not simply discarded as though it was never a Being... If the spirit Is immortal where does it go if not back to God??

Reply
May 18, 2019 12:26:36   #
susanblange Loc: USA
 
lindajoy wrote:
Must respectfully disagree, from God this soul and spirit came and when that soul/spirit leaves it returns to God..Not simply discarded as though it was never a Being... If the spirit Is immortal where does it go if not back to God??


I think you're confusing the soul and the spirit. Most people do. Babies in the womb are a soul (body) but they do not have a spirit. I don't think babies breathe until they are born. Oxygen is the "life force".

Reply
May 18, 2019 13:56:41   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
When an egg if fertilized, is it a being? I asked my daughter when she was two, where is she. She instinctively pointed to her head. We are who our brains are, not our beating hearts.

At what point does a mass of neurons come together to make up a being? And don't say potential to be a "being" is being a "being." Every cell in our bodies has the potential to be a "being."

It's not about potential, it's about when we actually are.
So, you have accepted the instincts of a two year old as a definition of who we are.

"Being" can simply mean 'to exist", or it can mean the nature or essence of a person, such as soul, spirit, inner self.

The brain, the heart, all vital organs, muscles, skeleton, and skin all function in concert. K**l the brain, the heart stops beating, k**l the heart the brain dies, and all other elements of physical existence die with them.

If you are going to define what is "being" from a purely humanist POV, then a being can be anything you want it to be and you can put any value on it that suits your fancy.

Humanism cannot answer the four fundamental questions that have plagued mankind from the beginning--Origin, Meaning, Morality, and Destiny. Even the great secular philosophers failed to fully answer those questions.

If we are nothing more than time plus matter plus chance, nothing more than chemistry and physics in motion, then we have no intrinsic worth. Our worth as human BEINGS is then determined by the state or an extrinsic philosophy.

Reply
May 18, 2019 14:16:59   #
susanblange Loc: USA
 
A baby is a part of the mother's body until it is born and the umbilical cord is cut. If it is not viable outside of the mother's body, then it will not survive. The soul is not alive until the baby is breathing. Genesis 2:7. "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul".

Reply
 
 
May 18, 2019 14:44:32   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Life begins at conception.. (New life)...

"Being" is subjective...

But without life there would be no "being"...

I will close by posing my own question...
When do we fully (if ever) develop into a complete "being"?

Really good thread...
Life begins at conception.. (New life)... br br &... (show quote)


Thanks man. I bring it up because I don't like the heart beat bill. I'm pro-life but I do respect when extreme circumstances occur that there could be good reason for an a******n for the health and well being of the mother, especially rape and incest. The child a rape victim is forced to carry will have the eyes of her attacker and the mother will be forced to see that every time see looks at her child; a definite mental health issue! I truly object to the in-discriminant use of a******n as birth control for people who should be responsible, especially those who repeatedly do it.

That being said, I simply got to thinking that a heart beat doesn't define a person or being. True, with out the heart beat there is no life and without life there can be no being. No issues with that. But I do think that being, as you say a subjective thing, is what we need to consider as where the line is drawn. Being subjective, it needs to be discussed to a much greater degree.

Thus, I don't hold with a zygote being a human. Those who take it to such extremes such as objecting to the use of the morning after pill, which doesn't stop fertillization but prevents implantation, are simply too extreme and have their beliefs based in to much religious self-righteousness.

Reply
May 18, 2019 15:22:39   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
So, you have accepted the instincts of a two year old as a definition of who we are.

"Being" can simply mean 'to exist", or it can mean the nature or essence of a person, such as soul, spirit, inner self.

The brain, the heart, all vital organs, muscles, skeleton, and skin all function in concert. K**l the brain, the heart stops beating, k**l the heart the brain dies, and all other elements of physical existence die with them.

If you are going to define what is "being" from a purely humanist POV, then a being can be anything you want it to be and you can put any value on it that suits your fancy.

Humanism cannot answer the four fundamental questions that have plagued mankind from the beginning--Origin, Meaning, Morality, and Destiny. Even the great secular philosophers failed to fully answer those questions.

If we are nothing more than time plus matter plus chance, nothing more than chemistry and physics in motion, then we have no intrinsic worth. Our worth as human BEINGS is then determined by the state or an extrinsic philosophy.
So, you have accepted the instincts of a two year ... (show quote)


My daughter is just an example of what we know instinctively, outside of the influences of religious teachings. I would point out that the brain can di and in many cased the heart continues to beat.

I don't know what humanism is, but I do, for myself, define being as a "who I am" thing, not just existing.

I also disagree with your "intrinsic worth" statement. Our effects upon others can define our worth, God or no God. I would ask, if we are made by God, how does that enhance our intrinsic worth??

My concern here is the effect of what I view as a draconian law in Alabama which doesn't allow for a******n even in the case of rape or incest. If my daughter was raped and pregnant and wanted to make sure she didn't have to have that baby, I would choose her over any fetus and the laws of any land, no matter what.

Reply
May 18, 2019 15:43:39   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Thanks man. I bring it up because I don't like the heart beat bill. I'm pro-life but I do respect when extreme circumstances occur that there could be good reason for an a******n for the health and well being of the mother, especially rape and incest. The child a rape victim is forced to carry will have the eyes of her attacker and the mother will be forced to see that every time see looks at her child; a definite mental health issue! I truly object to the in-discriminant use of a******n as birth control for people who should be responsible, especially those who repeatedly do it.

That being said, I simply got to thinking that a heart beat doesn't define a person or being. True, with out the heart beat there is no life and without life there can be no being. No issues with that. But I do think that being, as you say a subjective thing, is what we need to consider as where the line is drawn. Being subjective, it needs to be discussed to a much greater degree.

Thus, I don't hold with a zygote being a human. Those who take it to such extremes such as objecting to the use of the morning after pill, which doesn't stop fertillization but prevents implantation, are simply too extreme and have their beliefs based in to much religious self-righteousness.
Thanks man. I bring it up because I don't like th... (show quote)


Like other recently-enacted a******n bills passed in Georgia, Ohio, Kentucky, Mississippi and elsewhere, the Alabama legislation will almost certainly be blocked by the lower courts because it runs counter to the 1973 Supreme Court Roe v Wade a******n rights ruling. And that’s the point. Anti-a******n state legislatures and governors want the Supreme Court’s new conservative majority to overturn, or at least significantly curtail, the a******n protections enshrined in Roe....

Im pro choice for the very reasons you give, not to use as a birth control..Never have nor will I support infantile genocide of full term babies!! Murder!!!!

Reply
May 18, 2019 15:44:57   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
susanblange wrote:
I think you're confusing the soul and the spirit. Most people do. Babies in the womb are a soul (body) but they do not have a spirit. I don't think babies breathe until they are born. Oxygen is the "life force".


Ok thank you...

Reply
 
 
May 18, 2019 16:02:25   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
lindajoy wrote:
Like other recently-enacted a******n bills passed in Georgia, Ohio, Kentucky, Mississippi and elsewhere, the Alabama legislation will almost certainly be blocked by the lower courts because it runs counter to the 1973 Supreme Court Roe v Wade a******n rights ruling. And that’s the point. Anti-a******n state legislatures and governors want the Supreme Court’s new conservative majority to overturn, or at least significantly curtail, the a******n protections enshrined in Roe....

Im pro choice for the very reasons you give, not to use as a birth control..Never have nor will I support infantile genocide of full term babies!! Murder!!!!
Like other recently-enacted a******n bills passed ... (show quote)


Oh absolutely, same here!

Reply
May 18, 2019 16:27:45   #
maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
 
PeterS wrote:
Good thing since 25% of all pregnancies ends in miscarriage. Think what would have happened if all those countless children that god had k**led if they didn't have souls. Lost in limbo I suppose, think what a monster that would make that god of yours if souls were bestowed sometime later! The question I have is since your god knows all, including our future before it has even happened, why would he create life knowing that it was going to end in miscarriage or a******n? That seems a bit heavy-handed for something that is supposed to be a loving and caring god. If god were so caring why would he create life knowing it was going to die before it even had a chance?
Good thing since 25% of all pregnancies ends in mi... (show quote)




God gives us freedom to choose what path we want to follow, so lets look at the reasons for all those 25% miscarriages...drugs would be #1. Poor prenatal care due to drugs #2. STD's contracted while engaging in prostitution due to #2 and #1. How the mother (and father) give care for the unborn baby makes all the difference in the world.
Jesus said you will not see the kingdom of God unless you become as a small child. Does that not tell you that aborted babies, murdered babies, abused babies DO see the kingdom of God?

Reply
May 18, 2019 16:36:12   #
son of witless
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
When an egg if fertilized, is it a being? I asked my daughter when she was two, where is she. She instinctively pointed to her head. We are who our brains are, not our beating hearts.

At what point does a mass of neurons come together to make up a being? And don't say potential to be a "being" is being a "being." Every cell in our bodies has the potential to be a "being."

It's not about potential, it's about when we actually are.


Excellent point, we are what we are at the time we. Okayyyyy. When we are first born and up to 6 months, we are an eating, crying, urinating, defecating, unintelligent, needy parasite. We do not seem to fit your definition of a being. So why is it a crime to k**l us ? We are not much more than when we were a fetus. Back then we had a price on our brainless heads.

Reply
May 18, 2019 17:24:22   #
maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
When an egg if fertilized, is it a being? I asked my daughter when she was two, where is she. She instinctively pointed to her head. We are who our brains are, not our beating hearts.

At what point does a mass of neurons come together to make up a being? And don't say potential to be a "being" is being a "being." Every cell in our bodies has the potential to be a "being."

It's not about potential, it's about when we actually are.




For anyone who's interested, check out 5 things a baby can do while still in the womb.

https://www.lifenews.com/2015/04/21/5-amazing-things-unborn-babies-can-do-in-the-womb/

This page helped me to realize that the time spent in the womb, is the baby getting ready to be born. It hears language and music, it remembers, it makes gestures, AND it dreams. Can any baby survive after birth with out cleaning, warming, care, and feeding? Nope. The mother supplies the baby with O2, blood, and nutrition until birth, and still requires round the clock care to make it.
No one has mentioned premature babies. Should they be left to die because they can't "make it" on their own?
Lay a dead body alongside a living body. What's the difference? They look the same, have the same organs, don't they? So, the only difference in the two is "life". So, define "life". I don't believe you can. Even when you are dead, your hair and nails still grow!. Since we can't define "life", how do we know when it starts? The egg and the sperm are both alive, are they not? If dead, there would be no baby. Life is life. We do everything in our power to keep an injured person alive, so why is it OK to k**l a baby?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 21 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.