Federal judge orders parts of Mueller report unredacted, made public
May 18, 2019 15:52:33 #
Woodbury and others: in flabbergasted how many of you here are legal scholars and geniuses.
You guys and gals should be Supreme Court justices, HAs and law school deans. And of course Constitutional scholars.
Rather than just opine on Trump and Barr, please give us a list of treatises and scholarly books you've written...with sources.
You guys and gals should be Supreme Court justices, HAs and law school deans. And of course Constitutional scholars.
Rather than just opine on Trump and Barr, please give us a list of treatises and scholarly books you've written...with sources.
May 18, 2019 16:59:54 #
woodguru wrote:
They can release it any time there is no further n... (show quote)
Barr will not break the law that Democrats put in place when Ken Starr investigated Bill Clinton. It is a law, and until it is changed, breaking it would constitute a crime. "OK, Attorney General Barr, we demand that you break the law....and when you do you will be held accountable and we will arrest you put you in jail." This is just ludicrous.
May 18, 2019 21:08:25 #
EmilyD wrote:
Barr will not break the law that Democrats put in place when Ken Starr investigated Bill Clinton. It is a law, and until it is changed, breaking it would constitute a crime. "OK, Attorney General Barr, we demand that you break the law....and when you do you will be held accountable and we will arrest you put you in jail." This is just ludicrous.
You can’t fix stupid
May 19, 2019 03:34:36 #
Since when has a lefty judge been independent and honest? Believe in the law??? Like the 9th circuit court, or one half of the Supreme Court. What a joke!
May 19, 2019 09:28:36 #
May 19, 2019 10:39:09 #
A judge can access the report in un redacted form. its the judges attempt to publicise it and release to the press via public information as part of court records that is unlawful and offensive. Or why did Mueller put it in there?.
so who is ever going to participate in any investigation ever again when judges won't uphold the rule of law for their own personal witch hunts?
That's the real Mueller legacy. Publish a report that keeps your hands clean but allows an avidly exploitative media to obtain confidential information.
Objecting to a P**********l Tweet is not a serious pursuit for any elected official. unless they've sold out to interested parties and have a retirement yacht waiting on Grand Cayman.
so who is ever going to participate in any investigation ever again when judges won't uphold the rule of law for their own personal witch hunts?
That's the real Mueller legacy. Publish a report that keeps your hands clean but allows an avidly exploitative media to obtain confidential information.
Objecting to a P**********l Tweet is not a serious pursuit for any elected official. unless they've sold out to interested parties and have a retirement yacht waiting on Grand Cayman.
May 19, 2019 10:46:42 #
Reaper13 wrote:
You can’t fix stupid
no but you can unlect the Congressman putting his re e******n coffers ahead of national interests.
Pursuing an agenda of impeachment shows how many oeipke would rather embarrass this country around the world for decades weaken our positions at every bargaining table and lessen the like lihood of allies support.
Just to rope a steer they were bribed to lasso or stay in office on unimpeachment p.r. speeches because they were elected on no other merits.
May 19, 2019 12:57:33 #
The entire report will be unredacted and the won't find a damned thing to implicate Trump or anyone else. The democrats and RINOs are really going to look like the I***TS that they are.
May 19, 2019 13:14:30 #
Gizard wrote:
The entire report will be unredacted and the won't find a damned thing to implicate Trump or anyone else. The democrats and RINOs are really going to look like the I***TS that they are.
I'm not too sure about that. I don't see AG Barr violating Federal Law at the whim of a Judge. Considering what this administration has done thus far, I wouldn't be surprised if Barr tells this ignorant of LAW Jurist to go pound sand~
May 19, 2019 13:27:22 #
We know now that the Kennedys did all kinds of underhanded stuff to obstruct justice. Robert Kennedy, when he was Attorney General, kept J. Edgar Hoover from divulging potential impeachable information on the President John Kennedy. We didn't hear anything from the liberal media at the time, and we still don't.
May 19, 2019 14:25:36 #
Gizard wrote:
The entire report will be unredacted and the won't find a damned thing to implicate Trump or anyone else. The democrats and RINOs are really going to look like the I***TS that they are.
I think it's the "underlying documents" also known as "supporting documents" of thousands of pages of information is what Congress wants to get their hands on. That's where they can really go digging for lots of dirt, and that's what Trump's Protective Executive Privilege took care of. It put those documents wholly in the hands of the White House and out of Barr's possession. Barr cannot release those documents, and that's why this will all come to a standstill, imo.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.