The Real Democratic Agenda: To Impeach Trump no matter how much fraud it takes (Page 8): Did you read the Muellar report did. So let’s start with the facts. Trump is fighting the full...

Airforceone

lindajoy wrote:

I did snd ask you to Typically point out where and whst Trump obstructed?? Not opinion, factual legal bases for an obstruction charge..

Did you read the Muellar report did. So let’s start with the facts. Trump is fighting the full Muellar report from coming out. It’s not just the Muellar summary (APPROXIMATELY 450 PAGES) he is blocking which portions have been released with redactions. There are over 500 pages of testimony by 400 witnesses. There is thousands of documents and evidence submitted to Muellar this is all being blocked by Trump (WHY) so that in mind I will give you a few examples of what I pulled directly from the Muellar report and you can various it but I am sure you won’t because you don’t want the facts.

Trump ordered Comey to drop the FBI investigations into National Security Advisor Mike Flynn.

Directed White House council to fire Muellar.

Messages to AG Jeff Session to limit the scope of Muellar probe.

Telling witnesses not to cooperate with Muellar.

Telling Cohen not to contradict him in Congressional testimony about Trump tower Moscow.

Attempting to hide the emails exposing Trump Jr’s meeting with Russians for dirt on Clinton.

Trump blocked and refused to release McGahn documents.

Trump tried and failed to get McGahn to say Trump didn’t try to Obstruct.

There is an additional of over 550 pages of corroborated evidence and documents from testimony by over 400 witnesses. The evidence received by the many search warrants that Muellar obtained. This Trump does not want to go public.

These are just a few that I can remember and if you read the Muellar 445 page report and not the 4 page Barr summary you just might get the facts.

I just can’t believe how Trump supporters refuse to read the Muellar report, and not ask the question why is Trump blocking Muellar and McGahn from testifying when Trump and Barr utilizing the bully pulpit to spread the news that the Muellar report fully exonerated Trump when it actually contradicts that BS when Muellar actually wrote in his report that it does not exonerate the president.

But read the report

Seth

Lonewolf wrote:

Of corse but chances of that are slim.

Good. Start composing your retraction now, and see if you can find a tasty recipe for crow while you're at it.

🍜 Crow soup?

🌮 Crow tacos you can share with your border jumper amigos?

🍩 Crownut?

🥐 Ah, oui, oui! Crowssants!

America 1 Loc: South Miami

Airforceone wrote:

Did you read the Muellar report did. So let’s star... (show quote)

Show where it does not exonerate the president.

TrueAmerican

Lonewolf wrote:

Did you forget Mueller found 8 acts of obstruction that had more than enough evidence to convict him,and provide grounds for impeachment,

Then please explain to me why he (mewller) didn't refer president Trump for prosecution? Take your time surely in a few hours, days, weeks or years you'll come up with some sort of BS story !!!!!!

Lonewolf

TrueAmerican wrote:

Then please explain to me why he (mewller) didn't refer president Trump for prosecution? Take your time surely in a few hours, days, weeks or years you'll come up with some sort of BS story !!!!!!

Just read the report forget trumps new lawyer barr

Airforceone

byronglimish wrote:

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍!!!

Then release the Muellar report un redacted and as Trump has told you he is 100% exonerated per the Muellar report. So let’s have a look at the testimony and all the corroborated evidence. It’s simple release it don’t go and hire a team of lawyers to block it. What is Trump hiding from

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Airforceone wrote:

Then release the Muellar report un redacted and as Trump has told you he is 100% exonerated per the Muellar report. So let’s have a look at the testimony and all the corroborated evidence. It’s simple release it don’t go and hire a team of lawyers to block it. What is Trump hiding from

The whole investigation should be thrown out because of the illegal FISA deal...the rest of it is your TDS.

alabuck Loc: Tennessee

Gatsby wrote:

Democrats know that impeachment is a fight that they cannot win,
but used correctly it could be a powerful political tool.
They want to hold off on official impeachment hearings until
the hight of the campaign season, then parade hearings all the way from the
Republican convention, through the general e******n.

That is why President Trump has drawn a "red line", and told them to "Put Up or Shut Up"

———————

Looks to me like the Dems are following the GOPTP’s playbook from the last e******n. HRC was under investigation by the GOPTP controlled Congress for her entire campaign. If fact, Trumpet is still wanting to investigate HRC and she’s no longer in office. Of course, all he’s doing is trying to create a diversion away from his own illegalities.

Additionally, his stonewalling of inquiries and subpoenas only adds to the perception of more obstruction on his part. If he’s as innocent as he claims he is, what does he have to lose by allowing his former subordinates to testify before Congressional committees? They have the constitutional obligation of oversight of the other 2 branches of government. Why hide behind “executive privilege”? How does all of this support his claim of being the “...most t***sparent president, ever?” Answer: It doesn’t.

He says one thing while doing the opposite. And, his mindless minions believe what he’s says, disregarding what he does; even to the point of making themselves look like absolute fools, defending him, on this site and elsewhere. His lies become their lies and they’re too drain-bramaged to realize it. To quote Mr. T, “Pity the fools ... .” 2020 can’t come soon enough, when we can get rid of Trumpet and gain control of the Senate.

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

TrueAmerican wrote:

Then please explain to me why he (mewller) didn't refer president Trump for prosecution? Take your time surely in a few hours, days, weeks or years you'll come up with some sort of BS story !!!!!!

Mueller did not have the Authority to refer him for prosecution as the DOJ goes by the rule that a sitting president can not be indicted. He just showed 10 cases of where he could be. and that aint no BS story. Why don't you at least read the Barr summary with out your orange colored glasses on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bylm1-Bernie

bylm1-Bernie wrote:

I'm sorry, LW, you'll have to go to an HRC supporter to get the answer to that. I've wondered the same thing myself for many years. Maybe Rachel Maddow or Don Lemon can tell you.

Did you not support her when she was running?

America 1 Loc: South Miami

Airforceone wrote:

Then release the Muellar report un redacted and as Trump has told you he is 100% exonerated per the Muellar report. So let’s have a look at the testimony and all the corroborated evidence. It’s simple release it don’t go and hire a team of lawyers to block it. What is Trump hiding from

The report is available to Congress almost completely unredacted.
Not one Democrat has bothered to read it.
Show the "collaborated evidence."
And what "testimony."

Lonewolf

America 1 wrote:

The report is available to Congress almost completely unredacted.
Not one Democrat has bothered to read it.
Show the "collaborated evidence."
And what "testimony."

that's kind of interesting and pisses me off they should read it and then and only then should they ask for more!

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

America 1 wrote:

The report is available to Congress almost completely unredacted.
Not one Democrat has bothered to read it.
Show the "collaborated evidence."
And what "testimony."

how do you know that

bahmer

jimpack123 wrote:

how do you know that

It has been on FOX news and Rush Limbaugh and various other conservative talk show hosts as well. The less than 2% redacted version is in a special room and there have been a number of republicans that have gone in a read that report and to date zero democrats have availed themselves of this report but they are the ones crying the loudest.

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

bahmer wrote:

It has been on FOX news and Rush Limbaugh and various other conservative talk show hosts as well. The less than 2% redacted version is in a special room and there have been a number of republicans that have gone in a read that report and to date zero democrats have availed themselves of this report but they are the ones crying the loudest.

Never believe what Fox news and Rush Limbaugh have to say they are not conservative there are far right dingbats. show me proof from a reliable source