The Real Democratic Agenda: To Impeach Trump no matter how much fraud it takes (Page 9): That is why you are so far out in left field that you can't even see home plate anymore.

bahmer

jimpack123 wrote:

Never believe what Fox news and Rush Limbaugh have to say they are not conservative there are far right dingbats. show me proof from a reliable source

That is why you are so far out in left field that you can't even see home plate anymore.

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

jimpack123 wrote:

Never believe what Fox news and Rush Limbaugh have to say they are not conservative there are far right dingbats. show me proof from a reliable source

Fox and Limbaugh stretch the t***h there are 6 democrats that could have read it so far they haven't on the Senate side Elizabeth Warren has read it, The Democrats are waiting the full report not the redacted one

America 1 Loc: South Miami

jimpack123 wrote:

Never believe what Fox news and Rush Limbaugh have to say they are not conservative there are far right dingbats. show me proof from a reliable source

Democrats have rebuffed the Justice Department's offer to see a less-redacted:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/22/politics/doug-collins-less-redacted-mueller-report/index.html
Now, Show where it does not exonerate the president.
Now, Show the "collaborated evidence."
And what "testimony."

Lonewolf

America 1 wrote:

Democrats have rebuffed the Justice Department's offer to see a less-redacted:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/22/politics/doug-collins-less-redacted-mueller-report/index.html
Now, Show where it does not exonerate the president.
Now, Show the "collaborated evidence."
And what "testimony."

Mueller said it didn't exonerate him in the report

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

America 1 wrote:

Democrats have rebuffed the Justice Department's offer to see a less-redacted:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/22/politics/doug-collins-less-redacted-mueller-report/index.html
Now, Show where it does not exonerate the president.
Now, Show the "collaborated evidence."
And what "testimony."

Show the whole report now Trump is claiming executive privilege what a crock

America 1 Loc: South Miami

jimpack123 wrote:

Show the whole report now Trump is claiming executive privilege what a crock

All you do is post opinions.
Never backup.

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

America 1 wrote:

All you do is post opinions.
Never backup.

look it up NBC news 4 days ago. he is claiming executive privilege over the unredacted report of Robert Mueller I am not good at copy and paste but all you have to do is google it lol bet you won't find on fox newsr

America 1 Loc: South Miami

jimpack123 wrote:

look it up NBC news 4 days ago. he is claiming executive privilege over the unredacted report of Robert Mueller I am not good at copy and paste but all you have to do is google it lol bet you won't find on fox newsr

The Justice Department, which asked the president to step in, described the assertion as a “protective” measure that would give Mr. Trump time to fully review the materials:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/08/us/politics/trump-executive-privilege-mueller-report.html

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

America 1 wrote:

The Justice Department, which asked the president to step in, described the assertion as a “protective” measure that would give Mr. Trump time to fully review the materials:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/08/us/politics/trump-executive-privilege-mueller-report.html

What a crock as Burr is Trumps yes man. Between this and the trade war with China that we the American people pay for not China will be his waterloo 700 point hit on the stock market as investors are worried about Trump also

Airforceone

byronglimish wrote:

The whole investigation should be thrown out because of the illegal FISA deal...the rest of it is your TDS.

Why was the FISA warrant illegal. I bet you don’t even know what a FISA warrant is and what’s required to get a FISA warrant.

Keep using the Fox News talking points and ignore the message and k**l the messenger.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Airforceone wrote:

Why was the FISA warrant illegal. I bet you don’t even know what a FISA warrant is and what’s required to get a FISA warrant.

Keep using the Fox News talking points and ignore the message and k**l the messenger.

You are about the most unlearned loon on OPP

Airforceone

TrueAmerican wrote:

Then please explain to me why he (mewller) didn't refer president Trump for prosecution? Take your time surely in a few hours, days, weeks or years you'll come up with some sort of BS story !!!!!!

It was not his job because you cannot indict a sitting president he referred his report to Congress to deal with, only Trump is blocking Congress from getting the full report.

Congress has to impeach and then Trump will be prosecuted but Trump before he leaves office will pardon himself but he will be arrested by the SDNY as an un indicted co-conspirator in the Michael Cohen case.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Airforceone wrote:

It was not his job because you cannot indict a sitting president he referred his report to Congress to deal with, only Trump is blocking Congress from getting the full report.

Congress has to impeach and then Trump will be prosecuted but Trump before he leaves office will pardon himself but he will be arrested by the SDNY as an un indicted co-conspirator in the Michael Cohen case.

How bad are your substance abuse problems, is it just cheap booze or are you addicted to narcotics too?

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

Seth wrote:

Good. Start composing your retraction now, and see... (show quote)

Last one is perfect!!!

Lonewolf

Airforceone wrote:

It was not his job because you cannot indict a sitting president he referred his report to Congress to deal with, only Trump is blocking Congress from getting the full report.

Congress has to impeach and then Trump will be prosecuted but Trump before he leaves office will pardon himself but he will be arrested by the SDNY as an un indicted co-conspirator in the Michael Cohen case.