Legal team defends teacher who raised sex ed concerns
Apr 21, 2019 14:11:16 #
Rose42 wrote:
You mean you wish all religions were amoral. They will all be one day - except for one.
Let me guess, yours?
Apr 22, 2019 07:39:44 #
Rose42 wrote:
Thats nonsense. Its brainwashing children that sexual perversions are okay. You can’t sugarcoat it with pc language.
This is where kevy learned his sexual perversions'!!
Apr 22, 2019 10:14:39 #
bggamers
Loc: georgia
Kevyn wrote:
There is not and has never been a t*********r or gay ideology. This is simply a curriculum that explains to students that not all people are the same. There is no promotion of a “LGBQ lifestyle” wh**ever that is. The curriculum simply explains that people are different in many ways and that they should be accepted regardless of their differences and respected as people.
Kevin this is a subject that should be for a parent to discuss with their children, not a school and I'm sure they will be hearing from other parents the paper they sent home probably said very little about what the class entailed
Apr 22, 2019 10:16:38 #
Rose42 wrote:
Thats nonsense. Its brainwashing children that sexual perversions are okay. You can’t sugarcoat it with pc language.
No.
It is educating them that some people, such as you, find much innocuous sexual activity practiced by regular people to be "perverted."
The problems consequential to those persons' personal discomfort should be worked out privately by them in their own preferred way. Without disturbing the peace, practice or performance of others who do not share their prejudices.
Apr 22, 2019 13:34:14 #
bggamers wrote:
Kevin this is a subject that should be for a parent to discuss with their children, not a school and I'm sure they will be hearing from other parents the paper they sent home probably said very little about what the class entailed
Agreed. Unfortunately many of the parents have been brainwashed to believe that "good" people don't differentiate. So will go along
Apr 22, 2019 13:37:35 #
bggamers
Loc: georgia
debeda wrote:
Agreed. Unfortunately many of the parents have been brainwashed to believe that "good" people don't differentiate. So will go along
If I still had kids in school I pull them out and move them OR set up a protest and put the school on notice that parent needs to be part of the decisions about what they consider acceptable
Apr 22, 2019 13:38:20 #
Singularity wrote:
No.
It is educating them that some people, such as you, find much innocuous sexual activity practiced by regular people to be "perverted."
The problems consequential to those persons' personal discomfort should be worked out privately by them in their own preferred way. Without disturbing the peace, practice or performance of others who do not share their prejudices.
It is educating them that some people, such as you, find much innocuous sexual activity practiced by regular people to be "perverted."
The problems consequential to those persons' personal discomfort should be worked out privately by them in their own preferred way. Without disturbing the peace, practice or performance of others who do not share their prejudices.
I disagree. Tots and young children are NOT sexually natured before their hormones kick in. Sex ed of ANY kind is indeed indoctrination to a 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 year old child. And this is the age group being targeted by the "d**g q***n story time" etc. And BTW that one is particularly insidious, because 3, 4 and 5 year olds just see all the gaudy hair, shiny make up and clothes and think "oooo, pretty".
Apr 22, 2019 13:40:05 #
bggamers wrote:
If I still had kids in school I pull them out and move them OR set up a protest and put the school on notice that parent needs to be part of the decisions about what they consider acceptable
Luckily some parents still do that. And many, many are publicly censured for it.Apr 22, 2019 13:44:55 #
Singularity wrote:
No.
It is educating them that some people, such as you, find much innocuous sexual activity practiced by regular people to be "perverted."
The problems consequential to those persons' personal discomfort should be worked out privately by them in their own preferred way. Without disturbing the peace, practice or performance of others who do not share their prejudices.
It is educating them that some people, such as you, find much innocuous sexual activity practiced by regular people to be "perverted."
The problems consequential to those persons' personal discomfort should be worked out privately by them in their own preferred way. Without disturbing the peace, practice or performance of others who do not share their prejudices.
No, its not innocuous. And it is brainwashing children. The L**T agenda should not be promoted in schools.
Its not prejudiced to know unnatural behavior. That's nonsense. If parents want to promote this to their children thats something for them to do at home.
Apr 22, 2019 13:49:50 #
Rose42 wrote:
No, its not innocuous. And it is brainwashing children. The L**T agenda should not be promoted in schools.
Its not prejudiced to know unnatural behavior. That's nonsense. If parents want to promote this to their children thats something for them to do at home.
Its not prejudiced to know unnatural behavior. That's nonsense. If parents want to promote this to their children thats something for them to do at home.
Apr 22, 2019 15:59:23 #
debeda wrote:
I disagree. Tots and young children are NOT sexually natured before their hormones kick in. Sex ed of ANY kind is indeed indoctrination to a 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 year old child. And this is the age group being targeted by the "d**g q***n story time" etc. And BTW that one is particularly insidious, because 3, 4 and 5 year olds just see all the gaudy hair, shiny make up and clothes and think "oooo, pretty".
did you mean natured or matured...?
Because 3D ultrasounds regularly reveal male fetuses masturbating in utero.
Apr 22, 2019 16:07:35 #
Singularity wrote:
did you mean natured or matured...?
Because 3D ultrasounds regularly reveal male fetuses masturbating in utero.
Because 3D ultrasounds regularly reveal male fetuses masturbating in utero.
I meant natured. Tho mature is also true. Little kids don't think of sex as a driving force was my point. Notwithstanding that little boys may or may not masturbate in the womb
Apr 22, 2019 16:41:47 #
debeda wrote:
I meant natured. Tho mature is also true. Little kids don't think of sex as a driving force was my point. Notwithstanding that little boys may or may not masturbate in the womb
Children observe the world around them and appreciate the pervasiveness of differences between individuals, even or especially sexual differences. But every experience is a learning experience. As soon as they get an iphone, they will begin to discover how to correct foolish notions and how much they still have to learn about their world. The current tend is not to retain and defend bigotry and bias over individual human differences.
Apr 22, 2019 16:43:56 #
Singularity wrote:
Children observe the world around them and appreciate the pervasiveness of differences between individuals, even or especially sexual differences. But every experience is a learning experience. As soon as they get an iphone, they will begin to discover how to correct foolish notions and how much they still have to learn about their world. The current tend is not to retain and defend bigotry and bias over individual human differences.
Well, bluntly, that is a twisty turny liberal non sequitur if I ever heard one. And attempted deflection from the original point.
Apr 22, 2019 16:48:49 #
debeda wrote:
Well, bluntly, that is a twisty turny liberal non sequitur if I ever heard one. And attempted deflection from the original point.
The point was the sexually bigoted teacher feeling squeamish about introducing a toddlers understanding of human sexuality to, uh, toddlers?!?
"People cited violation of the First Amendment when a New Jersey schoolteacher asserted that evolution and the Big Bang are not scientific and that Noah's ark carried dinosaurs. This case is not about the need to separate church and state; it's about the need to separate ignorant, scientifically illiterate people from the ranks of teachers." Neil deGrasse Tyson
How's that for blunt?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.