Will Trump Send I******s to Sanctuary Cities? There are definitely good points and bad. Which side are you on with this controversial plan? Rush says it's a fantastic idea and he...

fullspinzoo

There are definitely good points and bad. Which side are you on with this controversial plan? Rush says it's a fantastic idea and he wishes he had thought of it, others not so much. https://ipatriot.com/will-trump-send-i******s-to-sanctuary-cities/

waltmoreno

fullspinzoo wrote:

There are definitely good points and bad. Which side are you on with this controversial plan? Rush says it's a fantastic idea and he wishes he had thought of it, others not so much. https://ipatriot.com/will-trump-send-i******s-to-sanctuary-cities/

Rush also had another idea which I had posted in another thread about Cher agreeing with Trump.
But I'll post it again here since it's pertinent.

For those who continue to advocate open borders and sanctuary cities, Rush Limbaugh has a novel, tongue in cheek idea. "Adopt an illegal". Brilliant! Just like any number of other humanitarian programs for disadvantaged people worldwide, heck even for portions of our highways.
He proposes various levels of participation starting with bronze to silver, then gold and ending at platinum. Subscribers would receive a signed photo of their i*****l a***n, and depending on their level of participation could correspond with him or her. Platinum subscribers would provide their home address to their illegal, who would be welcome into the subscriber's home if the illegal was dissatisfied with their social services benefits.
I think it's a great idea for the open border, sanctuary city advocates.

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

fullspinzoo wrote:

There are definitely good points and bad. Which side are you on with this controversial plan? Rush says it's a fantastic idea and he wishes he had thought of it, others not so much. https://ipatriot.com/will-trump-send-i******s-to-sanctuary-cities/

I think Trump was just trolling the left to highlight their hypocrisy to the America people. Just in the nick of time, the 9th Circut Court of Appeals ruled he can legally make then wait in Mexico until their appeal hearing. But if that ruling is overturned, yes send them to sanctuary states and cities. That's why they exist, to protect i******s and lawbreakers.

Liberty Tree

fullspinzoo wrote:

There are definitely good points and bad. Which side are you on with this controversial plan? Rush says it's a fantastic idea and he wishes he had thought of it, others not so much. https://ipatriot.com/will-trump-send-i******s-to-sanctuary-cities/

The first place i******s should be sent is back from whence they came. Sending them to sanctuary cities seems like a good idea on the surface, but there are downsides. First, these cities are Democrat controlled so it will be easier for them to become v**ers there. Secondly, these cities will still push for tax dollars to support them and liberal judges will support them. We already see i******s being given benefits not given to citizens.

fullspinzoo

waltmoreno wrote:

Rush also had another idea which I had posted in a... (show quote)

I'm sure Nancy will take two. A door man and a gardener.

Smedley_buzkill

fullspinzoo wrote:

I'm sure Nancy will take two. A door man and a gardener.

Don't forget a cabana boy. I hear they are all the rage among geriatric Liberal witches.

fullspinzoo

Smedley_buzk**l wrote:

Don't forget a cabana boy. I hear they are all the rage among geriatric Liberal witches.

I can't believe I forgot the cabana boy. Thanks, smed.

Smedley_buzkill

fullspinzoo wrote:

I can't believe I forgot the cabana boy. Thanks, smed.

De nada

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

Sending them to sanctuary cities is the same as giving up on a losing battle. They do the same with the homeless---just bus them somewhere else.

Smedley_buzkill

Coos Bay Tom wrote:

Sending them to sanctuary cities is the same as giving up on a losing battle. They do the same with the homeless---just bus them somewhere else.

Good idea. How about Mexico? They let these "refugees" enter their country illegally and traverse the entire length undeterred until they arrived at our border. Now they are upset that we won't take them in after we already took in half of Mexico?

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

Smedley_buzk**l wrote:

Good idea. How about Mexico? They let these "refugees" enter their country illegally and traverse the entire length undeterred until they arrived at our border. Now they are upset that we won't take them in after we already took in half of Mexico?

Every body has to be somewhere--They will find somewhere to land,

Gatsby

fullspinzoo wrote:

There are definitely good points and bad. Which side are you on with this controversial plan? Rush says it's a fantastic idea and he wishes he had thought of it, others not so much. https://ipatriot.com/will-trump-send-i******s-to-sanctuary-cities/

They should deport as many as they can (legally), then ship the remainder to "sanctuary" communities;

By the 2020 e******n, there will not be a single "sanctuary" community left in the nation!

America 1 Loc: South Miami

fullspinzoo wrote:

There are definitely good points and bad. Which side are you on with this controversial plan? Rush says it's a fantastic idea and he wishes he had thought of it, others not so much. https://ipatriot.com/will-trump-send-i******s-to-sanctuary-cities/

I******s, what more needs to be said.
Send them packing.
We don't need i******s in any city or state.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

Peewee wrote:

I think Trump was just trolling the left to highlight their hypocrisy to the America people. Just in the nick of time, the 9th Circut Court of Appeals ruled he can legally make then wait in Mexico until their appeal hearing. But if that ruling is overturned, yes send them to sanctuary states and cities. That's why they exist, to protect i******s and lawbreakers.

I wondered if he was trolling them. He does often, but it goes over their heads. I was just reading a newsletter that said a few things: 1. It is legal, the ninth circuit almost always rejects pro-Trump programs, see what SCOTUS says although it is constitutional. 2. The "shakeup" at DHS is Trump installing some he wants, in short, he's been working on this for a while.

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:

I wondered if he was trolling them. He does often, but it goes over their heads. I was just reading a newsletter that said a few things: 1. It is legal, the ninth circuit almost always rejects pro-Trump programs, see what SCOTUS says although it is constitutional. 2. The "shakeup" at DHS is Trump installing some he wants, in short, he's been working on this for a while.

He is fighting the left, the neocons, the deep state, the NWO, the Fed, the Taliban, and a few others. The man hasn't broken a sweat. I'm extremely impressed. After Thursday he will be completely unchained. Then comes the declassification, the arrests, and tribunals offshore and trials onshore. I'm expecting some more false f**gs. Colorado locked down some schools due to threats by some crazy woman from Miami. Heard she died but didn't get the rest of the story yet. The end is much nearer now and the deep state knows it. I'm guessing between A****a and B*M some civil disobedience is next or some jihad and MS13 crap. Hope Horowitz and Huber have got the ringleaders in their sites or people are going to die. Can't be helped.