One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Liberals. What is wrong with Trumps proposal to send i*****l a***ns to Sanctuary cities?
Page <<first <prev 9 of 11 next> last>>
Apr 16, 2019 23:01:19   #
redpill Loc: Oregon - not PDX
 
Rue wrote:
I think sending immigrants to sanctuary states is GREAT ! As does Washington state and at this point so does 13 other states. You do realize approximately 99.9% of Americans are from immigrants, unless you were born to American Indians you to see an immigrant or a son or daughter of immigrants, many of those immigrants came from countries that wanted America destroyed Including Russia, Germany etc. BTW, I am a registered democrats BUT I do not always v**e democratic, or independent or republican, I v**e for who I feel will do the best job for America and her people NOT the ones who are there to get richer by stealing from this once great country.
I think sending immigrants to sanctuary states is ... (show quote)


Welcome to OPP Rue. How you v**e is not necessarily the issue. How you decide to v**e is. As a former Democrat, I first went your route, then gave up ever figuring that any Democrat was worth the risk. I now v**e straight Republican because I do not want to dilute my v**e for other platforms... If I do, the others may win and that has proved to be disastrous. As for 99.9% of us all being immigrants, I'd bet that before recent decades, that 99.9% of those were LEGAL immigrants. Few here are against people legally coming into this country. Since i*****l i*******ts are being released because of reasons I cannot fathom, then let them be released fairly throughout the US, starting with sanctuary cities and states.

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 01:12:27   #
redpill Loc: Oregon - not PDX
 
JFlorio wrote:
I have read and studied much about the Indian Nations, culture and the different tribes way of life. Books by Allen W. Eckert are both entertaining and accurate. The Indians were not (except a few tribes) builders. They didn't even have gun powder. Most were nomadic and very territorial. We have a tendency, especially liberals to romanticize the American Indian. There was much to admire about them but they weren't some non-violent group before Europeans got here. Read up on the Iroquois Nation. Perfect example. Tribes completely wiped out other tribes; to extinction. They kept s***es. They sold s***es to the Mexicans. They were by there very nature doomed to be conquered. I am in no way giving the way they were treated a pass. I think the treaties we signed and broke is a National disgrace. Most of the reservations are the poorest areas in America. Much should be done to make life on the reservation better because it would be the right thing to do.
I have read and studied much about the Indian Nati... (show quote)


I was riding in the back seat on a road trip. In the front was a co-worker and my boss (I think he was Mormon or something VERY Christian). When we went by a row of houses out in the back country of Oregon, he complained about the wasted dollars that these Indians were given because they would not take care of their property. They just wasted it on booze. He b***hed and b***hed about the lazy drunk stupid backward Indians so long that I finally said "if we had k**led them all, there wouldn't be this problem".... OMG!

Let's just say I got what I wanted. I wanted him to consider the fate we put these people in by providing them with no hope of making a better life for themselves. Why in the world do we allow these peoples to have "nations" within our nation? The whole Bureau of Indian Affairs should be dismantled, the lands removed from reservation status, and they be assimilated as American citizens. Their r********ns have been paid. Let them live a free life in this country.

Of course, now, they will fight tooth and nail to keep the benefits they have while complaining about the White Man's world. BTW White Man is anyone not "Native-American". Oh, how dev**e they are for the land...a tear comes to their eyes when they see their sacred land defiled. Nowhere do we see ads that show the respect and heart-sickness that White-Americans have when the land is defiled. We don't have the right to feel anguish.

For those here that have PC-itist, I love the positive parts of Indian heritage that First Nations bring to the American culture. As do I of all immigrant peoples that share the ideals of what America is. For those that do not, send them home (via sanctuary cities as a rest stop).

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 01:20:13   #
redpill Loc: Oregon - not PDX
 
Nickolai wrote:
It doesn't mean they are welcome , it means they will not be jousted around for looking Latino. ICE can do it unmolested but local police will not help


BS. Sanctuary means that even if they are a known felon they will not be turned over to ICE. It means they are more protected than established citizens.

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 01:21:33   #
redpill Loc: Oregon - not PDX
 
Carlos wrote:
There is absolutely nothing wrong with sending all the i******s to sanctuary cities. Let the liberals support
Them with healthcare, education,housing, food etc. the people who v**ed for those who are In Charge should be happy to have their taxes increased to support them. They should also be happy make space to them for university placement instead of their own children. It's good for them and better for us. They
Could also track who is the one robbing people,rapeing women, who is on welfare and for how long.i think it's a good idea really, the only flea in the ointment is they might want to leave and go to other places. That
Could be a problem, and they'd be able to because they would all have a drivers license. But this is what those in sanctuary cities want, they agree that this is the way it should be. Of course they howl and scream
When there's a murder by one of the i******s but they feel better when they can blame President Trump.
But all in all At least we would know where a lot of them are.

What fools these mortals be.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with sending all... (show quote)



Reply
Apr 17, 2019 01:23:40   #
redpill Loc: Oregon - not PDX
 
Nickolai wrote:
Its a misdemeanor big deal and we don't believe in racially profiling people especially when we have a large population of Latino Americans who have been living in California for generations. In the 1980's I had wo of my Employees headed to work one morning got pulled over by border patrol and taken to Dublin before it was revealed they were US citizens and missed a days work because of the disruption


Wrong is wrong. Creating a bigger wrong is not making it right. Fix the problem of wrongful profiling without protecting all the bad guys.

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 01:28:55   #
redpill Loc: Oregon - not PDX
 
PJT wrote:
F.D.R. intriguing idea but too much like the Left Behind books where false properties over world. Too much like "666".


And too much like "1984". A slope too slippery to travel across.

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 02:09:40   #
redpill Loc: Oregon - not PDX
 
eagleye13 wrote:
They should have ankle bracelets put on them. When they leave sanctuary cities; it is back to Mexico with them.
Build the fence!


That I like. They are criminals on release and should be tracked.

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 08:21:05   #
Mikeyavelli
 
redpill wrote:
Welcome to OPP Rue. How you v**e is not necessarily the issue. How you decide to v**e is. As a former Democrat, I first went your route, then gave up ever figuring that any Democrat was worth the risk. I now v**e straight Republican because I do not want to dilute my v**e for other platforms... If I do, the others may win and that has proved to be disastrous. As for 99.9% of us all being immigrants, I'd bet that before recent decades, that 99.9% of those were LEGAL immigrants. Few here are against people legally coming into this country. Since i*****l i*******ts are being released because of reasons I cannot fathom, then let them be released fairly throughout the US, starting with sanctuary cities and states.
Welcome to OPP Rue. How you v**e is not necessari... (show quote)


Alaska. Send them to Lisa Murkowski, she's a near kommiecrat and there is plenty of room.

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 08:29:21   #
PJT
 
No Mikeyavelli. Alaska is a good Republican state. Don't punish all Alaskans because Murkowski is disloyal to the GOP and is intimidated by the Left.

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 08:34:46   #
zillaorange
 
redpill wrote:
And too much like "1984". A slope too slippery to travel across.


I believe we're already on that SLIPPERY SLOPE", sadly !

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 08:43:32   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
kankune wrote:
Geeeze....not seeing any Dems on this thread..wonder why...lol


"Geeeze....not seeing any Dems on this thread..wonder why...lol"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re72di5phM0

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 08:44:22   #
Mikeyavelli
 
PJT wrote:
No Mikeyavelli. Alaska is a good Republican state. Don't punish all Alaskans because Murkowski is disloyal to the GOP and is intimidated by the Left.


Think of how comfortable the south American i******s will be in Alaska.
They'll start walking back home, which is exactly why Alaska is good for them. They would h**e it. Take Murkowski with them.

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 08:50:52   #
zillaorange
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Think of how comfortable the south American i******s will be in Alaska.
They'll start walking back home, which is exactly why Alaska is good for them. They would h**e it. Take Murkowski with them.


Good 1, as long as they continue South of the Mexican boarder !!! I'll take a bunch in that direction myself !!! LOL

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 08:58:39   #
zillaorange
 
lindajoy wrote:
A very good idea..Humanity rules, eh??

I disagree though.. I wonder with the number of people they have just how much vetting is done before dropping them off where sanctuary status welcomes them..

Sorry, but this doesn’t correct anything but make our country less safe not even knowing who is being released to whom.. Our safety is less, our concern for these illnesses already popping up ( measles) is heightened and it increases our risks and financial nightmare in yet more being brought in...

President Trump needs to make it perfectly clear they wanted them, they get them without federal funding!
Watch the crime level change too~~ pppfftt
A very good idea..Humanity rules, eh?? br br I d... (show quote)


I don't think it would work. As much as I like the idea, the cost would be enormous ! Why waste any more of OUR money on them ? CLOSE THE BORDER ! It is a National Emergency issue. I'll say it again, this is an INVASION !!!

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 09:13:32   #
Mikeyavelli
 
zillaorange wrote:
I don't think it would work. As much as I like the idea, the cost would be enormous ! Why waste any more of OUR money on them ? CLOSE THE BORDER ! It is a National Emergency issue. I'll say it again, this is an INVASION !!!


Yep, put up the sign and the razor ribbon and the dogs and the wall.
We Are Closed.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.