One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Questions Evolutionists Cannot Answer
Page 1 of 13 next> last>>
Apr 6, 2019 09:44:09   #
bahmer
 
Questions Evolutionists Cannot Answer
By David Jolly - April 6, 2019

You hear it every day that science proves evolution is a fact while nothing proves that the biblical account of creation is a fact. To be honest, most secularists say it’s a battle between science and Bible, but they are so very wrong. In reality, science proves evolution is nothing more than a religious belief.

I’ve spent much of the last 30 years studying the subject. I’ve read all of the works of Charles Darwin, Thomas Huxley, Stephen J. Gould and many other evolutionists, especially in those who wrote early on in the field of population genetics. I’ve also read the works of many biblical creationists and have spoken with many of them.

I have a Bachelor of Science degree in wildlife/fisheries biology and a Master of Science degree in biology (population genetics). The title of my master’s thesis was:

‘The Mediterranean Gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus turcicus, In Central Arizona: A Life History And Examination Of The Effects Of Colonization Via The Founder Principle’
Trending: 120 Christians K**led in Nigeria and the World Remains Silent

It was a two-fold thesis that dealt with the way the gecko migrated from Florida to Arizona, which was touted as being an example of the founder principle, an evolutionary tool for population genetics.

What I found was that as the geckos were t***sported across the southern US via freight trucks, establishing populations along the way, the geckos gradually LOST genetic information to the point that the geckos in Arizona may now be a subspecies of the original population. This is the exact opposite of what evolution requires.

All this to establish that I have a good idea of what I am about to present to you, several basic questions upon which all evolutionary theory rests.

1- Evolution believes that everything started with some kind of big bang. They surmise that a tiny particle suddenly expanded as a result of a massive Big Bang explosion. If that is true, from where did that tiny particle come from to begin with? It had to have had a beginning, but I’ve yet to see any concept that explains it’s origins. Without the Big Bang, evolution has no real explanation for the universe and everything in it.

2- The formation of the first cell. All evolutionary biology books teach one of the foundational laws of biology is that life cannot arise from non-life. Yet, their entire theory of evolutionary biology is based upon the premise that life DID arise from non-life, thus violating their own basic law. Some try to say that life came from outer space, but that still doesn’t solve the problem because there still had to be an origin somewhere, an origin from a non-living source.

Some say that the first cell formed in some prebiotic soups of chemicals, and have spent years trying to duplicate the process. But know that in all of the experiments, there is some kind of distillation chamber or collection chamber to separate any organic molecules and proteins they produce. If they don’t do that, the very same process that creates the molecules and proteins also destroys them and there were no distillation chambers in their so-called prehistoric world.

3- The basic law of information theory is that intelligence cannot arise from non-intelligence. Please bear with me. All of life, from one-celled organisms to complex creatures such as man, is based on a source of information or language. You are all familiar with DNA and RNA, which in reality are two separate languages, in which one language – RNA – reads, interprets and acts upon the primary language – DNA. According to the basic law of information, the complex languages of DNA and RNA had to come from some source of intelligence. What is that source?

To make this part even more complex and impossible is to know that there is another entirely different language in multi-cellular organisms. Molecules called oligosaccharides exist on the outside of every cell and in between cells. They determine what enters the cell and they also handle cell-to-cell communication. There are many different oligosaccharides, each with a different function. This means that life originated with 3 languages – information, all of which could not arise from non-intelligence, according to the evolutionists basic law of information.

If evolutionists are honest, they will be forced to admit that they cannot sufficiently answer any of these questions, all of which proves that evolution is not fact and it’s not science. Evolutionists and creationists all have the same science, but a different foundational belief (presuppositions) with which they interpret the science.

For example, science says that a dinosaur bone has been fossilized and that the dinosaur is now extinct. An evolutionist looks at the dinosaur bones and assumes it is millions of years old based upon their belief in millions of years. A creationist looks at the same dinosaur bone and theorizes that it most likely was buried quickly during the Genesis Flood and the rapid burial helped preserve and fossilize the bone. Same science, two different interpretations based upon one’s belief.

However, back to science. Based upon their own laws, there is no explanation for the origin of the Big Bang, impossible for life to arise from non-life and impossible for the languages of DNA, RNA and oligosaccharides to have formed from a non-intelligent source. Conclusion – evolution impossible according to their own laws.

Reply
Apr 6, 2019 10:28:15   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
bahmer wrote:
Questions Evolutionists Cannot Answer
By David Jolly - April 6, 2019

You hear it every day that science proves evolution is a fact while nothing proves that the biblical account of creation is a fact. To be honest, most secularists say it’s a battle between science and Bible, but they are so very wrong. In reality, science proves evolution is nothing more than a religious belief.

I’ve spent much of the last 30 years studying the subject. I’ve read all of the works of Charles Darwin, Thomas Huxley, Stephen J. Gould and many other evolutionists, especially in those who wrote early on in the field of population genetics. I’ve also read the works of many biblical creationists and have spoken with many of them.

I have a Bachelor of Science degree in wildlife/fisheries biology and a Master of Science degree in biology (population genetics). The title of my master’s thesis was:

‘The Mediterranean Gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus turcicus, In Central Arizona: A Life History And Examination Of The Effects Of Colonization Via The Founder Principle’
Trending: 120 Christians K**led in Nigeria and the World Remains Silent

It was a two-fold thesis that dealt with the way the gecko migrated from Florida to Arizona, which was touted as being an example of the founder principle, an evolutionary tool for population genetics.

What I found was that as the geckos were t***sported across the southern US via freight trucks, establishing populations along the way, the geckos gradually LOST genetic information to the point that the geckos in Arizona may now be a subspecies of the original population. This is the exact opposite of what evolution requires.

All this to establish that I have a good idea of what I am about to present to you, several basic questions upon which all evolutionary theory rests.

1- Evolution believes that everything started with some kind of big bang. They surmise that a tiny particle suddenly expanded as a result of a massive Big Bang explosion. If that is true, from where did that tiny particle come from to begin with? It had to have had a beginning, but I’ve yet to see any concept that explains it’s origins. Without the Big Bang, evolution has no real explanation for the universe and everything in it.

2- The formation of the first cell. All evolutionary biology books teach one of the foundational laws of biology is that life cannot arise from non-life. Yet, their entire theory of evolutionary biology is based upon the premise that life DID arise from non-life, thus violating their own basic law. Some try to say that life came from outer space, but that still doesn’t solve the problem because there still had to be an origin somewhere, an origin from a non-living source.

Some say that the first cell formed in some prebiotic soups of chemicals, and have spent years trying to duplicate the process. But know that in all of the experiments, there is some kind of distillation chamber or collection chamber to separate any organic molecules and proteins they produce. If they don’t do that, the very same process that creates the molecules and proteins also destroys them and there were no distillation chambers in their so-called prehistoric world.

3- The basic law of information theory is that intelligence cannot arise from non-intelligence. Please bear with me. All of life, from one-celled organisms to complex creatures such as man, is based on a source of information or language. You are all familiar with DNA and RNA, which in reality are two separate languages, in which one language – RNA – reads, interprets and acts upon the primary language – DNA. According to the basic law of information, the complex languages of DNA and RNA had to come from some source of intelligence. What is that source?

To make this part even more complex and impossible is to know that there is another entirely different language in multi-cellular organisms. Molecules called oligosaccharides exist on the outside of every cell and in between cells. They determine what enters the cell and they also handle cell-to-cell communication. There are many different oligosaccharides, each with a different function. This means that life originated with 3 languages – information, all of which could not arise from non-intelligence, according to the evolutionists basic law of information.

If evolutionists are honest, they will be forced to admit that they cannot sufficiently answer any of these questions, all of which proves that evolution is not fact and it’s not science. Evolutionists and creationists all have the same science, but a different foundational belief (presuppositions) with which they interpret the science.

For example, science says that a dinosaur bone has been fossilized and that the dinosaur is now extinct. An evolutionist looks at the dinosaur bones and assumes it is millions of years old based upon their belief in millions of years. A creationist looks at the same dinosaur bone and theorizes that it most likely was buried quickly during the Genesis Flood and the rapid burial helped preserve and fossilize the bone. Same science, two different interpretations based upon one’s belief.

However, back to science. Based upon their own laws, there is no explanation for the origin of the Big Bang, impossible for life to arise from non-life and impossible for the languages of DNA, RNA and oligosaccharides to have formed from a non-intelligent source. Conclusion – evolution impossible according to their own laws.
Questions Evolutionists Cannot Answer br By David ... (show quote)






BAM!

And God said...and there was!

Humanism is the name of their religion, by the way. It originated with Lucifer when he rejected God and His ways, and instituted himself as the new god. And they are still sacrificing children at his altar!

Reply
Apr 6, 2019 10:41:39   #
bahmer
 
TommyRadd wrote:


BAM!

And God said...and there was!

Humanism is the name of their religion, by the way. It originated with Lucifer when he rejected God and His ways, and instituted himself as the new god. And they are still sacrificing children at his altar!
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)


Spot on I will see what other responses this gets.

Reply
 
 
Apr 6, 2019 10:53:39   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
bahmer wrote:
Questions Evolutionists Cannot Answer
By David Jolly - April 6, 2019

You hear it every day that science proves evolution is a fact while nothing proves that the biblical account of creation is a fact. To be honest, most secularists say it’s a battle between science and Bible, but they are so very wrong. In reality, science proves evolution is nothing more than a religious belief.

I’ve spent much of the last 30 years studying the subject. I’ve read all of the works of Charles Darwin, Thomas Huxley, Stephen J. Gould and many other evolutionists, especially in those who wrote early on in the field of population genetics. I’ve also read the works of many biblical creationists and have spoken with many of them.

I have a Bachelor of Science degree in wildlife/fisheries biology and a Master of Science degree in biology (population genetics). The title of my master’s thesis was:

‘The Mediterranean Gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus turcicus, In Central Arizona: A Life History And Examination Of The Effects Of Colonization Via The Founder Principle’
Trending: 120 Christians K**led in Nigeria and the World Remains Silent

It was a two-fold thesis that dealt with the way the gecko migrated from Florida to Arizona, which was touted as being an example of the founder principle, an evolutionary tool for population genetics.

What I found was that as the geckos were t***sported across the southern US via freight trucks, establishing populations along the way, the geckos gradually LOST genetic information to the point that the geckos in Arizona may now be a subspecies of the original population. This is the exact opposite of what evolution requires.

All this to establish that I have a good idea of what I am about to present to you, several basic questions upon which all evolutionary theory rests.

1- Evolution believes that everything started with some kind of big bang. They surmise that a tiny particle suddenly expanded as a result of a massive Big Bang explosion. If that is true, from where did that tiny particle come from to begin with? It had to have had a beginning, but I’ve yet to see any concept that explains it’s origins. Without the Big Bang, evolution has no real explanation for the universe and everything in it.

2- The formation of the first cell. All evolutionary biology books teach one of the foundational laws of biology is that life cannot arise from non-life. Yet, their entire theory of evolutionary biology is based upon the premise that life DID arise from non-life, thus violating their own basic law. Some try to say that life came from outer space, but that still doesn’t solve the problem because there still had to be an origin somewhere, an origin from a non-living source.

Some say that the first cell formed in some prebiotic soups of chemicals, and have spent years trying to duplicate the process. But know that in all of the experiments, there is some kind of distillation chamber or collection chamber to separate any organic molecules and proteins they produce. If they don’t do that, the very same process that creates the molecules and proteins also destroys them and there were no distillation chambers in their so-called prehistoric world.

3- The basic law of information theory is that intelligence cannot arise from non-intelligence. Please bear with me. All of life, from one-celled organisms to complex creatures such as man, is based on a source of information or language. You are all familiar with DNA and RNA, which in reality are two separate languages, in which one language – RNA – reads, interprets and acts upon the primary language – DNA. According to the basic law of information, the complex languages of DNA and RNA had to come from some source of intelligence. What is that source?

To make this part even more complex and impossible is to know that there is another entirely different language in multi-cellular organisms. Molecules called oligosaccharides exist on the outside of every cell and in between cells. They determine what enters the cell and they also handle cell-to-cell communication. There are many different oligosaccharides, each with a different function. This means that life originated with 3 languages – information, all of which could not arise from non-intelligence, according to the evolutionists basic law of information.

If evolutionists are honest, they will be forced to admit that they cannot sufficiently answer any of these questions, all of which proves that evolution is not fact and it’s not science. Evolutionists and creationists all have the same science, but a different foundational belief (presuppositions) with which they interpret the science.

For example, science says that a dinosaur bone has been fossilized and that the dinosaur is now extinct. An evolutionist looks at the dinosaur bones and assumes it is millions of years old based upon their belief in millions of years. A creationist looks at the same dinosaur bone and theorizes that it most likely was buried quickly during the Genesis Flood and the rapid burial helped preserve and fossilize the bone. Same science, two different interpretations based upon one’s belief.

However, back to science. Based upon their own laws, there is no explanation for the origin of the Big Bang, impossible for life to arise from non-life and impossible for the languages of DNA, RNA and oligosaccharides to have formed from a non-intelligent source. Conclusion – evolution impossible according to their own laws.
Questions Evolutionists Cannot Answer br By David ... (show quote)


So elementary, especially for a "science" person.

First of all, evolution implies NOTHING about the beginning of the universe OR the origin of life. Nothing.

Second, there is no "rule" of evolution which requires a gain in genetic information as change occurs. Your gecko's lost genetic information simply because their environment didn't require certain things which the original environment did. The genetic information is lost due to random non-lethal alterations in the genetic materials.

One can argue that life could not arise without intelligent assistance, but evolution IS a fact which IS ongoing AND occurring.

Reply
Apr 6, 2019 10:54:51   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
bahmer wrote:
Questions Evolutionists Cannot Answer
By David Jolly - April 6, 2019

You hear it every day that science proves evolution is a fact while nothing proves that the biblical account of creation is a fact. To be honest, most secularists say it’s a battle between science and Bible, but they are so very wrong. In reality, science proves evolution is nothing more than a religious belief.

I’ve spent much of the last 30 years studying the subject. I’ve read all of the works of Charles Darwin, Thomas Huxley, Stephen J. Gould and many other evolutionists, especially in those who wrote early on in the field of population genetics. I’ve also read the works of many biblical creationists and have spoken with many of them.

I have a Bachelor of Science degree in wildlife/fisheries biology and a Master of Science degree in biology (population genetics). The title of my master’s thesis was:

‘The Mediterranean Gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus turcicus, In Central Arizona: A Life History And Examination Of The Effects Of Colonization Via The Founder Principle’
Trending: 120 Christians K**led in Nigeria and the World Remains Silent

It was a two-fold thesis that dealt with the way the gecko migrated from Florida to Arizona, which was touted as being an example of the founder principle, an evolutionary tool for population genetics.

What I found was that as the geckos were t***sported across the southern US via freight trucks, establishing populations along the way, the geckos gradually LOST genetic information to the point that the geckos in Arizona may now be a subspecies of the original population. This is the exact opposite of what evolution requires.

All this to establish that I have a good idea of what I am about to present to you, several basic questions upon which all evolutionary theory rests.

1- Evolution believes that everything started with some kind of big bang. They surmise that a tiny particle suddenly expanded as a result of a massive Big Bang explosion. If that is true, from where did that tiny particle come from to begin with? It had to have had a beginning, but I’ve yet to see any concept that explains it’s origins. Without the Big Bang, evolution has no real explanation for the universe and everything in it.

2- The formation of the first cell. All evolutionary biology books teach one of the foundational laws of biology is that life cannot arise from non-life. Yet, their entire theory of evolutionary biology is based upon the premise that life DID arise from non-life, thus violating their own basic law. Some try to say that life came from outer space, but that still doesn’t solve the problem because there still had to be an origin somewhere, an origin from a non-living source.

Some say that the first cell formed in some prebiotic soups of chemicals, and have spent years trying to duplicate the process. But know that in all of the experiments, there is some kind of distillation chamber or collection chamber to separate any organic molecules and proteins they produce. If they don’t do that, the very same process that creates the molecules and proteins also destroys them and there were no distillation chambers in their so-called prehistoric world.

3- The basic law of information theory is that intelligence cannot arise from non-intelligence. Please bear with me. All of life, from one-celled organisms to complex creatures such as man, is based on a source of information or language. You are all familiar with DNA and RNA, which in reality are two separate languages, in which one language – RNA – reads, interprets and acts upon the primary language – DNA. According to the basic law of information, the complex languages of DNA and RNA had to come from some source of intelligence. What is that source?

To make this part even more complex and impossible is to know that there is another entirely different language in multi-cellular organisms. Molecules called oligosaccharides exist on the outside of every cell and in between cells. They determine what enters the cell and they also handle cell-to-cell communication. There are many different oligosaccharides, each with a different function. This means that life originated with 3 languages – information, all of which could not arise from non-intelligence, according to the evolutionists basic law of information.

If evolutionists are honest, they will be forced to admit that they cannot sufficiently answer any of these questions, all of which proves that evolution is not fact and it’s not science. Evolutionists and creationists all have the same science, but a different foundational belief (presuppositions) with which they interpret the science.

For example, science says that a dinosaur bone has been fossilized and that the dinosaur is now extinct. An evolutionist looks at the dinosaur bones and assumes it is millions of years old based upon their belief in millions of years. A creationist looks at the same dinosaur bone and theorizes that it most likely was buried quickly during the Genesis Flood and the rapid burial helped preserve and fossilize the bone. Same science, two different interpretations based upon one’s belief.

However, back to science. Based upon their own laws, there is no explanation for the origin of the Big Bang, impossible for life to arise from non-life and impossible for the languages of DNA, RNA and oligosaccharides to have formed from a non-intelligent source. Conclusion – evolution impossible according to their own laws.
Questions Evolutionists Cannot Answer br By David ... (show quote)


I believe the “big bang” was Gods action in play followed by evolution as he wanted to watch the creation of the universe... Why can it not be both??? What is there to say it is not both??

Reply
Apr 6, 2019 10:56:01   #
Kevyn
 
bahmer wrote:
Questions Evolutionists Cannot Answer
By David Jolly - April 6, 2019

You hear it every day that science proves evolution is a fact while nothing proves that the biblical account of creation is a fact. To be honest, most secularists say it’s a battle between science and Bible, but they are so very wrong. In reality, science proves evolution is nothing more than a religious belief.

I’ve spent much of the last 30 years studying the subject. I’ve read all of the works of Charles Darwin, Thomas Huxley, Stephen J. Gould and many other evolutionists, especially in those who wrote early on in the field of population genetics. I’ve also read the works of many biblical creationists and have spoken with many of them.

I have a Bachelor of Science degree in wildlife/fisheries biology and a Master of Science degree in biology (population genetics). The title of my master’s thesis was:

‘The Mediterranean Gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus turcicus, In Central Arizona: A Life History And Examination Of The Effects Of Colonization Via The Founder Principle’
Trending: 120 Christians K**led in Nigeria and the World Remains Silent

It was a two-fold thesis that dealt with the way the gecko migrated from Florida to Arizona, which was touted as being an example of the founder principle, an evolutionary tool for population genetics.

What I found was that as the geckos were t***sported across the southern US via freight trucks, establishing populations along the way, the geckos gradually LOST genetic information to the point that the geckos in Arizona may now be a subspecies of the original population. This is the exact opposite of what evolution requires.

All this to establish that I have a good idea of what I am about to present to you, several basic questions upon which all evolutionary theory rests.

1- Evolution believes that everything started with some kind of big bang. They surmise that a tiny particle suddenly expanded as a result of a massive Big Bang explosion. If that is true, from where did that tiny particle come from to begin with? It had to have had a beginning, but I’ve yet to see any concept that explains it’s origins. Without the Big Bang, evolution has no real explanation for the universe and everything in it.

2- The formation of the first cell. All evolutionary biology books teach one of the foundational laws of biology is that life cannot arise from non-life. Yet, their entire theory of evolutionary biology is based upon the premise that life DID arise from non-life, thus violating their own basic law. Some try to say that life came from outer space, but that still doesn’t solve the problem because there still had to be an origin somewhere, an origin from a non-living source.

Some say that the first cell formed in some prebiotic soups of chemicals, and have spent years trying to duplicate the process. But know that in all of the experiments, there is some kind of distillation chamber or collection chamber to separate any organic molecules and proteins they produce. If they don’t do that, the very same process that creates the molecules and proteins also destroys them and there were no distillation chambers in their so-called prehistoric world.

3- The basic law of information theory is that intelligence cannot arise from non-intelligence. Please bear with me. All of life, from one-celled organisms to complex creatures such as man, is based on a source of information or language. You are all familiar with DNA and RNA, which in reality are two separate languages, in which one language – RNA – reads, interprets and acts upon the primary language – DNA. According to the basic law of information, the complex languages of DNA and RNA had to come from some source of intelligence. What is that source?

To make this part even more complex and impossible is to know that there is another entirely different language in multi-cellular organisms. Molecules called oligosaccharides exist on the outside of every cell and in between cells. They determine what enters the cell and they also handle cell-to-cell communication. There are many different oligosaccharides, each with a different function. This means that life originated with 3 languages – information, all of which could not arise from non-intelligence, according to the evolutionists basic law of information.

If evolutionists are honest, they will be forced to admit that they cannot sufficiently answer any of these questions, all of which proves that evolution is not fact and it’s not science. Evolutionists and creationists all have the same science, but a different foundational belief (presuppositions) with which they interpret the science.

For example, science says that a dinosaur bone has been fossilized and that the dinosaur is now extinct. An evolutionist looks at the dinosaur bones and assumes it is millions of years old based upon their belief in millions of years. A creationist looks at the same dinosaur bone and theorizes that it most likely was buried quickly during the Genesis Flood and the rapid burial helped preserve and fossilize the bone. Same science, two different interpretations based upon one’s belief.

However, back to science. Based upon their own laws, there is no explanation for the origin of the Big Bang, impossible for life to arise from non-life and impossible for the languages of DNA, RNA and oligosaccharides to have formed from a non-intelligent source. Conclusion – evolution impossible according to their own laws.
Questions Evolutionists Cannot Answer br By David ... (show quote)


Yet to be answered scientific questions in no way support your or anyone else’s creation myth. It is abject lunacy to literally believe the story of Genesis. The world was not created in 7 days a few thousand years ago, and their are mountains of scientific evidence that proves that beyond any reasoned doubt.

Reply
Apr 6, 2019 10:56:54   #
bahmer
 
lindajoy wrote:
I believe the “big bang” was Gods action in play followed by evolution as he wanted to watch the creation of the universe... Why can it not be both??? What is there to say it is not both??


The Bible and the book of Genesis which was inspired and God cannot lie. How are those answers?

Reply
 
 
Apr 6, 2019 10:59:43   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
So elementary, especially for a "science" person.

First of all, evolution implies NOTHING about the beginning of the universe OR the origin of life. Nothing.

Second, there is no "rule" of evolution which requires a gain in genetic information as change occurs. Your gecko's lost genetic information simply because their environment didn't require certain things which the original environment did. The genetic information is lost due to random non-lethal alterations in the genetic materials.

One can argue that life could not arise without intelligent assistance, but evolution IS a fact which IS ongoing AND occurring.
So elementary, especially for a "science"... (show quote)


Exactly~~~ well said...

It is after all the change in the characteristics of biological populations over generations of time.. And yes, we are still evolving altho often enough I have my doubts about that....

Reply
Apr 6, 2019 11:02:34   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
bahmer wrote:
The Bible and the book of Genesis which was inspired and God cannot lie. How are those answers?


I think I said it started with God’s bang( meaning creation) and evolution followed... Is that what you understood?? If not then I was not clear enough..

As for : How are those answers? We agree...

Reply
Apr 6, 2019 11:06:45   #
bahmer
 
lindajoy wrote:
Exactly~~~ well said...

It is after all the change in the characteristics of biological populations over generations of time.. And yes, we are still evolving altho often enough I have my doubts about that....


That sounds like a mutation rather than an evolution.

Reply
Apr 6, 2019 11:06:50   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
lindajoy wrote:
Exactly~~~ well said...

It is after all the change in the characteristics of biological populations over generations of time.. And yes, we are still evolving altho often enough I have my doubts about that....


Same here. I think we are seeing that intelligence is also NOT a natural end to the evolution of a species nor is it's maintenance in a population. LOL! I used to tell my students to consider what we see in living creatures; that most, if not all responses point to the need to get the next meal and reproduce.

Reply
 
 
Apr 6, 2019 11:18:45   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
So elementary, especially for a "science" person.

First of all, evolution implies NOTHING about the beginning of the universe OR the origin of life. Nothing.

Second, there is no "rule" of evolution which requires a gain in genetic information as change occurs. Your gecko's lost genetic information simply because their environment didn't require certain things which the original environment did. The genetic information is lost due to random non-lethal alterations in the genetic materials.

One can argue that life could not arise without intelligent assistance, but evolution IS a fact which IS ongoing AND occurring.
So elementary, especially for a "science"... (show quote)


Thanks.... You saved me some typing...

Reply
Apr 6, 2019 11:20:12   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
lindajoy wrote:
Exactly~~~ well said...

It is after all the change in the characteristics of biological populations over generations of time.. And yes, we are still evolving altho often enough I have my doubts about that....


Me too...

Some of my cousins seem to be regressing...

And I am sure evolution would never have embraced baldness....

Reply
Apr 6, 2019 11:20:47   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
bahmer wrote:
That sounds like a mutation rather than an evolution.


Mutation is evolution....

Reply
Apr 6, 2019 11:23:38   #
Big dog
 
lindajoy wrote:
I believe the “big bang” was Gods action in play followed by evolution as he wanted to watch the creation of the universe... Why can it not be both??? What is there to say it is not both??


I’m with you, it’s a very complicated subject and way above the heads of us mere humans.

Reply
Page 1 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.