Message Sent...Mueller's Department Can And Will Leak If Barr Tries To Withhold Dirt (Page 2): In which all the GOP needs to do is release the facts if they have a left spin. We know...

woodguru

Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:

You don't think Schiff will leak ANYTHING he can to CNN, MSNBC and other msms? Judging by the past you can bet your life he will. Remember, they don't need cold hard facts, just a piece then spin it. Russian dressing-a Russian operative. That kind of thing.

In which all the GOP needs to do is release the facts if they have a left spin. We know they don't or they would already be released.

woodguru

Liberty Tree wrote:

For once why don't you admit the t***h. You do not want t***h, t***sparency, or the people's right to know. You and the other Democrats just hope to keep digging everywhere you can think of in hopes of finding something, anything you can use in your desire of getting Trump.

Now that's quite the spin there, I want the t***h, and that would be a full release of the investigation...

meanwhile those calling themselves patriots and being all about the rule of law support hiding a report that you know is damaging to the president.

The rule of law would be about Trump being held accountable

woodguru

ACP45 wrote:

Wood, br From your link on the Hill: br "Barr... (show quote)

He was unable to reach a conclusion because that is not up to the DOJ since they can't prosecute a sitting president.

Proof is proof, and the more there is the better it's corroborated, we need to see it so that the endless circular arguments between the right and left can stop.

You conveniently miss the part where even Barr states that there are troubling things, and congress will look at it with an eye toward does it meet the bar toward impeachment needing to be done before the resulting prosecution. Barr can't recommend prosecution because he doesn't believe a sitting president should be.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

woodguru wrote:

Now that's quite the spin there, I want the t***h, and that would be a full release of the investigation...

meanwhile those calling themselves patriots and being all about the rule of law support hiding a report that you know is damaging to the president.

The rule of law would be about Trump being held accountable

You will get the t***h soon enough minus Grand Jury which is NOT going to be in report!!!

woodguru

proud republican wrote:

You will get the t***h soon enough minus Grand Jury which is NOT going to be in report!!!

If Barr had his way, which is looking very shaky at this point, minus several other things as well, particularly the absence of anything damaging to a person who is not going to be charged with anything. That left a hole you could drive a truck through.

We have been covering how easily the grand jury part can be negated, by simply asking the judge and making a case for the necessity of the information. Barr can do it if he wants to, congress can do it.

You forget who Barr works for, and it is not the president. He represents this country, the constitution, and the people of this country, and that includes the ones that do not support this president. Barr actually represents justice and holding the president accountable if evidence shows "troubling things" as he has already said Mueller's report did. It is not Barr's place to decide whether to prosecute since the DOJ takes the position that a sitting president can't be.

badbob85037

woodguru wrote:

Hey, they didn't leak details, just pointed out that Barr did not accurately reflect the message the report intends to portray... no harm no foul. It's a message to Barr, try to pull partisan obfuscation and you will get burned. Hey... the easiest way to fix this if these people are lying is to simply let the report out.

The only thing that's worse than simply releasing the full report to congress and then deciding what if anything needs to be redacted to the public is to fight it and lose and then have seriously damaging information come out.

Here's something Barr said in his mini press release that should trouble those who have the ability to pay attention to facts and what they mean... he said that there were difficult and troubling information including new revelations the public had not heard, but that they didn't rise to the level of prosecution. Now keep in mind that Barr is running on the concept that the DOJ cannot prosecute a sitting president, so nothing including smoking guns qualifies for him to state that there is anything that indictments can be brought on. I'm sure it was his intent to then keep that information from congress.

According to Wednesday's breaking Mueller "leaks", several individual reports were written on separate issues by department personnel that qualify as troubling and needing to be made public. All personnel including Mueller can be questioned by house investigations, and they are fully capable of telling heads of house committees what they need to ask to get this information into play.

The GOP has a dilemma, get it out sooner rather than later, or fight this going into the e******n and be seen as trying to obstruct this when it does get out, whether it leaks or court battles over congress and people's right to have information.

https://dmlnews.com/report-justice-department-addresses-reports-mueller-team-unhappy-barrs-letter/

...and is this how an innocent man acts?
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/437356-trump-lashes-out-at-new-york-times-for-mueller-reporting

Hey, they didn't leak details, just pointed out th... (show quote)

Well of course they will leak more BS. What else would you expect from a bunch of Trump hating sub-humans . That's all they got left. But sorry. It's Trump's turn.

badbob85037

woodguru wrote:

If Barr had his way, which is looking very shaky a... (show quote)

You don't support this president?! That sounds a little treasonous. After all you supported Obama and he didn't seem to know the difference between the Constitution and the C*******t Manifesto. Why don't you trust Trump at least till he violates the Constitution?

Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas

Pennylynn wrote:

Thank you, he is a bangle mix.... mixed with what, I have no idea. He is very friendly and bright. The bangle does not shed a lot so they are ideal for allergy suffers. I love the Mau and Russian Blues..... great personalities and high energy. You are blessed to have them.

Did you mean Bengal? They are seriously beautiful, look just like a miniature tiger, as does yours. I would love to find one for myself!

Iamdjchrys Loc: Decatur, Texas

woodguru wrote:

He was unable to reach a conclusion because that i... (show quote)

Whether or not the DOJ can begin proceedings against a sitting president has never been decided definitively. Barr states there are "troubling" things in Mueller's tome, and individuals from both Barr's office and Mueller's have written memos to the effect that Barr's 4-page summary report avoids many serious situations that should have been included. Time will tell.

PJT

The Dems will not give up trying to destroy Trump with lies and innuendo. They and their media buddies have mastered Goebbels propaganda tactics. The GOP seems not to have a clue how to counteract any of this, not the will to stand united.
I fear for the future of our country. The left has already captured the college generation and much of the lower education.

TrueAmerican

woodguru wrote:

Hey, they didn't leak details, just pointed out that Barr did not accurately reflect the message the report intends to portray... no harm no foul. It's a message to Barr, try to pull partisan obfuscation and you will get burned. Hey... the easiest way to fix this if these people are lying is to simply let the report out.

The only thing that's worse than simply releasing the full report to congress and then deciding what if anything needs to be redacted to the public is to fight it and lose and then have seriously damaging information come out.

Here's something Barr said in his mini press release that should trouble those who have the ability to pay attention to facts and what they mean... he said that there were difficult and troubling information including new revelations the public had not heard, but that they didn't rise to the level of prosecution. Now keep in mind that Barr is running on the concept that the DOJ cannot prosecute a sitting president, so nothing including smoking guns qualifies for him to state that there is anything that indictments can be brought on. I'm sure it was his intent to then keep that information from congress.

According to Wednesday's breaking Mueller "leaks", several individual reports were written on separate issues by department personnel that qualify as troubling and needing to be made public. All personnel including Mueller can be questioned by house investigations, and they are fully capable of telling heads of house committees what they need to ask to get this information into play.

The GOP has a dilemma, get it out sooner rather than later, or fight this going into the e******n and be seen as trying to obstruct this when it does get out, whether it leaks or court battles over congress and people's right to have information.

https://dmlnews.com/report-justice-department-addresses-reports-mueller-team-unhappy-barrs-letter/

...and is this how an innocent man acts?
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/437356-trump-lashes-out-at-new-york-times-for-mueller-reporting

Hey, they didn't leak details, just pointed out th... (show quote)

First of Mueller DOES NOT HAVE a department, he's got a circle jerk of l*****t liberal demonRATS !!!!!!

bggamers Loc: georgia

woodguru wrote:

So you think we should be in the dark and have to ... (show quote)

no but we shouldnt try to push for early release till its ready

Radiance3

Pennylynn wrote:

Here is why you will see a report that is heavily ... (show quote)

================
It is illegal to release classified information that will imperil the security of our country and people.
The radical DEMS want DOJ Barr to violate the law. The radical DEMS wanted to be the grand jury to render their own verdict. They are above the law.

The law has spoken and NO Trump collusion with Russia was found. NO obstruction of justice was found.

By the way, Comey was removed from the FBI with recommendation of Rosenstein. He deserved to be removed as a result of exonerating Hillary's massive crimes committed. DOJ Lynch was part of that.
Then they initiated investigation of his removal, Comey leaked to a friend at the NYT, which started the Mueller investigation. Hired Mueller their buddy and friend to investigate. Comey is a t*****r -friend of Hillary criminal Clinton. For 22 months and 7 days, with $40 million expended, Mueller never found any collusion/obstruction of president Trump.

Facts: It was Bill and Hillary who colluded with Russia with the blessings of Bama.
Bill got the $500 million speaking fee for 20 minutes. Hillary got the $145 million for the 20% Uranium One sale to Russia. Her Foundation got the $145 million. Both of them had spoken to Vlad Putin.
They all must be investigated, and justice must be rendered. They are treasonous.

maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee

woodguru wrote:

Hey, they didn't leak details, just pointed out that Barr did not accurately reflect the message the report intends to portray... no harm no foul. It's a message to Barr, try to pull partisan obfuscation and you will get burned. Hey... the easiest way to fix this if these people are lying is to simply let the report out.

The only thing that's worse than simply releasing the full report to congress and then deciding what if anything needs to be redacted to the public is to fight it and lose and then have seriously damaging information come out.

Here's something Barr said in his mini press release that should trouble those who have the ability to pay attention to facts and what they mean... he said that there were difficult and troubling information including new revelations the public had not heard, but that they didn't rise to the level of prosecution. Now keep in mind that Barr is running on the concept that the DOJ cannot prosecute a sitting president, so nothing including smoking guns qualifies for him to state that there is anything that indictments can be brought on. I'm sure it was his intent to then keep that information from congress.

According to Wednesday's breaking Mueller "leaks", several individual reports were written on separate issues by department personnel that qualify as troubling and needing to be made public. All personnel including Mueller can be questioned by house investigations, and they are fully capable of telling heads of house committees what they need to ask to get this information into play.

The GOP has a dilemma, get it out sooner rather than later, or fight this going into the e******n and be seen as trying to obstruct this when it does get out, whether it leaks or court battles over congress and people's right to have information.

https://dmlnews.com/report-justice-department-addresses-reports-mueller-team-unhappy-barrs-letter/

...and is this how an innocent man acts?
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/437356-trump-lashes-out-at-new-york-times-for-mueller-reporting

Hey, they didn't leak details, just pointed out th... (show quote)

I disagree... the easiest fix is to just seal the documents like Fox did for Jesse Smollett.( I agree with Chris Rock, he gets no respect from me).

woodguru

PJT wrote:

The Dems will not give up trying to destroy Trump with lies and innuendo. They and their media buddies have mastered Goebbels propaganda tactics. The GOP seems not to have a clue how to counteract any of this, not the will to stand united.
I fear for the future of our country. The left has already captured the college generation and much of the lower education.

They don't have to use lies and innuendo when facts and the t***h are the reality... and how do you fend off lies and innuendo when they are in play? By releasing the facts, it's called t***sparency, unless of course the facts prove guilt, then you hide them.