Hey, they didn't leak details, just pointed out that Barr did not accurately reflect the message the report intends to portray... no harm no foul. It's a message to Barr, try to pull partisan obfuscation and you will get burned. Hey... the easiest way to fix this if these people are lying is to simply let the report out.

The only thing that's worse than simply releasing the full report to congress and then deciding what if anything needs to be redacted to the public is to fight it and lose and then have seriously damaging information come out.

Here's something Barr said in his mini press release that should trouble those who have the ability to pay attention to facts and what they mean... he said that there were difficult and troubling information including new revelations the public had not heard, but that they didn't rise to the level of prosecution. Now keep in mind that Barr is running on the concept that the DOJ cannot prosecute a sitting president, so nothing including smoking guns qualifies for him to state that there is anything that indictments can be brought on. I'm sure it was his intent to then keep that information from congress.

According to Wednesday's breaking Mueller "leaks", several individual reports were written on separate issues by department personnel that qualify as troubling and needing to be made public. All personnel including Mueller can be questioned by house investigations, and they are fully capable of telling heads of house committees what they need to ask to get this information into play.

The GOP has a dilemma, get it out sooner rather than later, or fight this going into the e******n and be seen as trying to obstruct this when it does get out, whether it leaks or court battles over congress and people's right to have information.

https://dmlnews.com/report-justice-department-addresses-reports-mueller-team-unhappy-barrs-letter/

...and is this how an innocent man acts?
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/437356-trump-lashes-out-at-new-york-times-for-mueller-reporting

Here is why you will see a report that is heavily redacted. Spokeswoman Kerri Kupec released a statement Thursday morning, saying the Justice Department was concerned about illegally releasing grand jury information, which is confidential.

"Every page of the 'confidential report' provided to Attorney General Barr on March 22, 2019 was marked 'May Contain Material Protected Under Fed. R. Crim. P.6(e)' — a law that protects confidential grand jury information — and therefore could not be publicly released," she wrote.

I was watching several commentaries about the precedent involved with releasing that grand jury hold...

...and no, there is a huge difference between may and does. Barr, if he were interested in t***sparency (which he clearly is not) could have that lifted. Also the members of congress intelligence committees are cleared for top secret information, and dems do one heck of a lot better job respecting that than the GOP does. If they see something that falls under grand jury rules they can easily have it lifted if they see something they need as evidence for actions needed.

And you want to know something else, these reports were prepared in a sanitized version that could be easily given to congress if not to the public later... as will be coming out.

Barr is in obstruction quicksand, and he is going to be forced to refuse to have Trump's back the way Trump wants.

Here is why you will see a report that is heavily redacted. Spokeswoman Kerri Kupec released a statement Thursday morning, saying the Justice Department was concerned about illegally releasing grand jury information, which is confidential.

"Every page of the 'confidential report' provided to Attorney General Barr on March 22, 2019 was marked 'May Contain Material Protected Under Fed. R. Crim. P.6(e)' — a law that protects confidential grand jury information — and therefore could not be publicly released," she wrote.

I was watching several commentaries about the precedent involved with releasing that grand jury hold...

...and no, there is a huge difference between may and does. Barr, if he were interested in t***sparency (which he clearly is not) could have that lifted. Also the members of congress intelligence committees are cleared for top secret information, and dems do one heck of a lot better job respecting that than the GOP does. If they see something that falls under grand jury rules they can easily have it lifted if they see something they need as evidence for actions needed.

And you want to know something else, these reports were prepared in a sanitized version that could be easily given to congress if not to the public later... as will be coming out.

Barr is in obstruction quicksand, and he is going to be forced to refuse to have Trump's back the way Trump wants.

Hey, they didn't leak details, just pointed out that Barr did not accurately reflect the message the report intends to portray... no harm no foul. It's a message to Barr, try to pull partisan obfuscation and you will get burned. Hey... the easiest way to fix this if these people are lying is to simply let the report out.

The only thing that's worse than simply releasing the full report to congress and then deciding what if anything needs to be redacted to the public is to fight it and lose and then have seriously damaging information come out.

Here's something Barr said in his mini press release that should trouble those who have the ability to pay attention to facts and what they mean... he said that there were difficult and troubling information including new revelations the public had not heard, but that they didn't rise to the level of prosecution. Now keep in mind that Barr is running on the concept that the DOJ cannot prosecute a sitting president, so nothing including smoking guns qualifies for him to state that there is anything that indictments can be brought on. I'm sure it was his intent to then keep that information from congress.

According to Wednesday's breaking Mueller "leaks", several individual reports were written on separate issues by department personnel that qualify as troubling and needing to be made public. All personnel including Mueller can be questioned by house investigations, and they are fully capable of telling heads of house committees what they need to ask to get this information into play.

The GOP has a dilemma, get it out sooner rather than later, or fight this going into the e******n and be seen as trying to obstruct this when it does get out, whether it leaks or court battles over congress and people's right to have information.

https://dmlnews.com/report-justice-department-addresses-reports-mueller-team-unhappy-barrs-letter/

...and is this how an innocent man acts?
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/437356-trump-lashes-out-at-new-york-times-for-mueller-reporting

I was watching several commentaries about the precedent involved with releasing that grand jury hold...

...and no, there is a huge difference between may and does. Barr, if he were interested in t***sparency (which he clearly is not) could have that lifted. Also the members of congress intelligence committees are cleared for top secret information, and dems do one heck of a lot better job respecting that than the GOP does. If they see something that falls under grand jury rules they can easily have it lifted if they see something they need as evidence for actions needed.

And you want to know something else, these reports were prepared in a sanitized version that could be easily given to congress if not to the public later... as will be coming out.

Barr is in obstruction quicksand, and he is going to be forced to refuse to have Trump's back the way Trump wants.

Hey, they didn't leak details, just pointed out that Barr did not accurately reflect the message the report intends to portray... no harm no foul. It's a message to Barr, try to pull partisan obfuscation and you will get burned. Hey... the easiest way to fix this if these people are lying is to simply let the report out.

The only thing that's worse than simply releasing the full report to congress and then deciding what if anything needs to be redacted to the public is to fight it and lose and then have seriously damaging information come out.

Here's something Barr said in his mini press release that should trouble those who have the ability to pay attention to facts and what they mean... he said that there were difficult and troubling information including new revelations the public had not heard, but that they didn't rise to the level of prosecution. Now keep in mind that Barr is running on the concept that the DOJ cannot prosecute a sitting president, so nothing including smoking guns qualifies for him to state that there is anything that indictments can be brought on. I'm sure it was his intent to then keep that information from congress.

According to Wednesday's breaking Mueller "leaks", several individual reports were written on separate issues by department personnel that qualify as troubling and needing to be made public. All personnel including Mueller can be questioned by house investigations, and they are fully capable of telling heads of house committees what they need to ask to get this information into play.

The GOP has a dilemma, get it out sooner rather than later, or fight this going into the e******n and be seen as trying to obstruct this when it does get out, whether it leaks or court battles over congress and people's right to have information.

https://dmlnews.com/report-justice-department-addresses-reports-mueller-team-unhappy-barrs-letter/


============
...and is this how an innocent man acts?
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/437356-trump-lashes-out-at-new-york-times-for-mueller-reporting