Liberty Tree

It is for Democrats

Sew_What

Have you?

Your president makes fun of disabled people, how is that loving?

He gives anyone he doesn't like a h**eful nickname, yea, Republicans are sweet and loving people.

Sew_What

Like the loving torch wielding white folks that marched through Charlottesville, and the gun toting, threatening protesters? Those darn Democrats, they stood there while a 3000 lb car drove over them, because the driver was sooooo loving.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Interesting, when the events of Charlottesville is deserted we find the core of the issue. First we know that Charlottesville had been in a months-long battle over what to do with a statue of Gen. Robert E. Lee, who led the Confederate army during the Civil War.

Many cities across the country have been grappling with what to do with their Confederate statues, as some feel that they are reminders of a dark time of r****m in U.S. history and should be taken down.

Earlier in 2017, the Charlottesville City Council had v**ed to remove the Lee statue and rename the park where it is located.

With applicable permits, the "Unite the Right" rally was scheduled for Sat. Aug. 12 and participants started to gather in Charlottesville the night before. At the same time, a group of counter protesters assembled to break up the the rally.

So, the Unite the Right marched around with their chants, hoping to change the decision to remove all Southern memorial sites, statutes, or f**gs from history. And then comes the counter protesters... who threw the first punch? Who charged into the other group first, I do not know. However, what I do know is simple, had the counter protesters not assembled and had allowed the protest of removing Robert E. Lee's statute, then there would not have been issues. We would now be talking about the loss of history instead of the loss of a life.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

So much to review and so easy to overlook..

a bit under the weather today, so I will only do a C & P...partial..


from Quora....


Some of it is in the E-Mails of Donald Trump, Jr.:

Email to Donald Trump, Jr., June 3, 2016:

“…to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father. This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump.” (Emphasis added.)

Email Reply, from Donald Trump, Jr., June 3, 2016:

“…if that’s the case, I love it!”

Email to Donald Trump, Jr., June 6, 2016:

“Let me know when you are free to talk with Emin by phone about this Hillary info - you had mentioned early this week so wanted to try to schedule a time and day.”

“and so wondered if 3pm or later on Thursday works for you?”

Email Reply, from Donald Trump, Jr., June 7, 2016:

“How about 3 at our offices? Thanks rob appreciate you helping set it up.”

Email to Donald Trump, Jr., June 7, 2016:

“Perfect won't sit in on the meeting, but will bring them at 3pm and introduce you etc. I will send the names of the two people meeting with you for security when I have them later today.”

Email Reply, from Donald Trump, Jr., June 7, 2016:

Great. It will likely be Paul Manafort (campaign boss) my brother in law and me, 725 Fifth Ave 25th floor.

NOTE: The meeting took place on June 9, 2016. We know with absolute certainty that Donald Trump, Jr., and Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort met with the Russians in that meeting. We are not positive who else might have been in the room.

—

There are several other examples as well. If you read the indictments, and the court documents, and the sentencing agreements, you see many such examples. Stop letting other people lie to you about what is in the court documents — read them for yourself. Then, you can re-join reality. You will feel much healthier, I promise.

Smedley_buzkill

I know how hard this is for you, but try and keep up. The AG has said the report will be released in about 2 weeks. It has not been released immediately because it probably contains classified or sensitive information and Grand Jury testimony that cannot, by law, be made public. The four PAGE report is merely a synopsis of the full report which will be released in about 2 weeks. This has been stated repeatedly for those of you who are not in the habit of listening nor reading.

Smedley_buzkill

Rejoin reality? How? By taking a statement posted on a left leaning blog site with no documentation as true? I suppose, for you, that might be reality. Other people hold reality to a higher standard.

TrueAmerican

Ignorant people say stupid things !!!!!!

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

the conversation was widely printed and I fully expected Don Jr to have to testify..

Much to find for those who look..

Seth

You're right, not for treasonous scum who have no right calling themselves Americans.

Seth

This is true. They will cherry pick sections they can distort against Trump and leak them to the F**e News© specialists at CNN, MSNBC, the NY Times, Mother Goose (Jones, wh**ever, SSDD) and the rest, who will spin non-collusion into Trump's being the 007 of the SVR.

Seth

C'mon, now, be considerate. America-hating, piece of s--t, left wing propagandists have to make a living, too.

Ricktloml

I do believe you have hit on something there.

Fit2BTied Loc: Texas

As usual, you're making a huge deal out of nothing. We think the report should be made public (minus the normally redacted stuff) the same as you do. The President of the United States spends over 2 years constantly being accused of treason without any proof, then when the report is released and you're told it will take a couple of weeks to process it you act like the aggrieved party. Put a sock in it.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Wh**ever is in this report when it is released will be read by everyone interested at the same time.... even the President will not see the report before it is released. In case you did not read Barr's letter, President Trump has waived Executive Privilege. So, if you are thinking that he is covering up something... think again.

Barr stated that "There are no plans to submit the report to the White House for a privilege review." And that would constitute a total waiver of executive privilege - an act that is both commendable and unprecedented in its degree of t***sparency.

The waiver of executive privilege has gone with nary a mention in coverage, as has the impressive speed and scope of Barr's disclosure in handling the report. Yet, for critics of executive privilege, this is a decision that is not only historic but good for our democracy.

While praise is only begrudgingly given to this president by a media he constantly (and offensively) labels as "the enemy of the people," the decision to waive privilege is not just worthy of praise but could well eclipse his predecessors in yielding inherent powers to the public interest.

In his letter to Congress, Barr noted that "although the President would have the right to assert privilege over certain parts of the report," he decided not to do so. It was an extraordinary moment not only for Trump but for Barr. Here is a link to the letter: https://www.scribd.com/document/402973432/AG-March-24-2019-Letter-to-House-and-Senate-Judiciary-Committees#from_embed