Couldn't tell you, Penny. I don't/won't even pretend to be Superman, as I am uncomfortable fitted with a leotard and/or leggings of spandex. Besides, Mr. Napolitano was the one offering his thoughts on the matter. I am sure he is quite qualified and capable of offering an opinion on legal matters.

After all, fair & balanced commentary calls for an honest opinion.

U.S. Attorney General Barr's summary of the Mueller Report...

https://www.businessinsider.com/heres-attorney-general-william-barrs-summary-of-the-mueller-report-2019-3

Trump-Mueller report contains damaging information on president, says Fox News' Judge Napolitano: 'There is something there'

Tom Embury-Dennis, The Independent • March 28, 2019

A Fox News legal analyst has warned viewers Robert Mueller’s report “undoubtedly” contains evidence of collusion with Russia and an attempt by Donald Trump to obstruct justice.

Andrew Napolitano, a former New Jersey superior court judge whose views have previously been parroted by Mr. Trump, also said the document ran to 700 pages, a detail previously unknown and yet to be confirmed by the Department of Justice.

A four-page summary of the report written over the weekend by attorney general William Barr cleared the Trump campaign of conspiracy and concluded there was insufficient evidence to prosecute the president with obstruction.

“In the 700-page summary of the 2 million pages of raw evidence, there is undoubtedly some evidence of a conspiracy, and some evidence of obstruction of justice,” Mr. Napolitano told Fox Business on Wednesday, adding Mr. Barr would have concluded it failed to pass the standard of reasonable doubt.

He continued: “Once the 700 pages comes out, Democrats and the president’s other opponents will have a field day with what is in there. If there were no evidence of conspiracy, and no evidence of obstruction, the attorney general would have told us so. He didn’t, so there is something in there that the Democrats and opponents of the president want to see. They will see it, and they will make hay out of it.”

The judge’s comments come amid a concerted effort by the White House and Republicans to cast the special counsel’s findings as a total exoneration of the president, despite the fact the report is yet to be released.

Mr. Trump and his allies, including many Fox pundits, are also using Mr. Barr’s summary to double down on their attacks against mainstream media outlets who reported on Mr. Mueller's investigation.

“For two years they’ve indulged in an orgy of hatred (for Trump) that colored absolutely everything,” one Fox presenter said, in a clip tweeted by Mr. Trump on Wednesday evening.

Earlier on Wednesday, House judiciary chairman Jerrold Nadler revealed Mr. Barr had told him in a phone call he would not commit to turning over Mr. Mueller’s report in full to Congress, and would almost certainly miss a 2 April deadline set by House Democrats.

“I’m very disturbed by that,” Mr. Nadler told reporters, adding the date was a “hard deadline”.

Backing up Mr. Napolitano’s claim, Mr. Nadler said the report’s length was “very substantial” - confirming it was fewer than 1,000 pages.

Napolitano, to my knowledge, is no longer a judge but an analyst and columnist. As a private citizen, he has the right to voice his opinion, regardless of any perceived "lean."

Also, “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”- Mueller being quoted by A.G. Barr in his summary of the Mueller Report.

What is so difficult to understand about that? The report does not exonerate President Trump. Period.

But, as stated in an earlier post, time will tell.

Napolitano, to my knowledge, is no longer a judge but an analyst and columnist. As a private citizen, he has the right to voice his opinion, regardless of any perceived "lean."

Also, “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”- Mueller being quoted by A.G. Barr in his summary of the Mueller Report.

What is so difficult to understand about that? The report does not exonerate President Trump. Period.

But, as stated in an earlier post, time will tell.

It's interesting that Hillary Clinton initiated communication "collusion" with Russia in hopes of a dossier that would ruin the opponent who she feared.

She used a rogue British spy, who then supposedly went to Russian spooks for salacious material.

Material that even Comey said was unsubstantiated, and Strzok said his concern was, "there's no there , there".

Brennan went forward with the Hillay dossier in spite of its lack of credibility, and is now spewing that he was given skewed evidence.

Would be analyst Napolitano has been walking the Collusion Delusion Fence all thru this f**e news hype of collusion, like he's being paid by Hillary.

Nappy has become a nothing burger in his own right.