One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Definitions "Political Correctness"
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
Mar 29, 2019 06:15:09   #
Seth
 
rumitoid wrote:
You simply do not get it and maybe never will. It is like the Bible said: "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter." (Isiah5:20)

PC is one manner of speaking that involves respect and understanding for adverse and varying perspectives. This is just one manner of speaking. Don't like it, don't use it. Being intolerant and oppressive is another manner of speaking, such as insisting certain words can't be used, the minority is holy, and opinion must be confined to broad and meaningless neutral phrases and ideas. Kumbaya.
You simply do not get it and maybe never will. It ... (show quote)


Either you really don't get it, or you're practicing to sell Edsels.

Reply
Mar 29, 2019 08:04:40   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Seth wrote:
The only side of the political divide that demands political correctness is the left side, and what you call "reasonable" or "acceptable" speech is invariably associated with such items as identity politics or social justice... I have listened to the left purvey some pretty foul insults and degrading comments about minority members who don't embrace you people's political views, for example, I've even read where Asian conservative writer Michelle Malkin is called a "gook" by "liberals" because she doesn't follow your doctrine, and seen video where Candace Owens, a black woman who is a conservative activist, is called a w***e s*********t, also accused of not being a real black person.

That, of course, never receives any criticism from the left, because political correctness, like all "speech rules," only apply to those in opposition to the agendas of the left.

You know as well as I do that what I am saying here is true, so why deny it?
The only side of the political divide that demands... (show quote)




You're wasting your time.

Reply
Mar 29, 2019 08:37:17   #
Seth
 
byronglimish wrote:
You're wasting your time.


Yeah, brainwashed is brainwashed...

Reply
 
 
Mar 29, 2019 08:42:18   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Seth wrote:
Yeah, brainwashed is brainwashed...


We all tend to view things from our own perspectives...

I have greatly enjoyed the exchange between Rumi and you....

Some excellent points, and certainly we have all grown in understanding of PC...

My hat off to both of you gentlemen...



Reply
Mar 29, 2019 08:50:11   #
Seth
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
We all tend to view things from our own perspectives...

I have greatly enjoyed the exchange between Rumi and you....

Some excellent points, and certainly we have all grown in understanding of PC...

My hat off to both of you gentlemen...
We all tend to view things from our own perspectiv... (show quote)


Reminds me of a tee shirt I once saw that said, "I'm not arguing, I'm only explaining why I'm right."

Reply
Mar 29, 2019 15:34:36   #
JoyV
 
rumitoid wrote:
Useless to continue. You are accepting the definition of PC by those that make their living using big nose and glasses costumes for their prejudices, dog whistles on r****m any human can hear, and promulgating h**e- and fear-mongering.

What is wrong with saying salesman? If you were a salesman, would you prefer the term be saleswoman? Not a big deal, just being conscious. If you were a flight attendant, would you prefer Stewardess? Explain that to your friends at the shooting range.


You are using a ridiculous and incorrect analogy. The politically correct expression was not to swap sex centered labels like salesman to saleswoman, but to eliminate them by saying salesperson. Stewards and stewardesses have become flight attendants. Mailmen have become postal carriers.

But now the g****r neutral is being replaced in the PC world with wh**ever g****r the person you are addressing or referring to chooses to be at the moment, whether the speaker knows what your preference is or not. So using a g****r neutral term can actually get you in trouble. on the other hand, there is the teacher who wants her class to address her in the Royal We since she can't make up her mind whether she is a man or woman. She sent home notices to parents on exactly how the students were to address her. Also, tenses can, and in fact MUST be thrown out as g****r correctness take priority over whether or not the pronoun is singular or plural. 'She' or 'he' is replaced by 'they'.

If all this sounds confusing or contradictory, the only thing that matters is no liberal or progressive or deserving minority be offended. Majorities or minorities who are not favored by the left can be offended or reviled at will.

So have I covered the rules?

Reply
Mar 29, 2019 15:35:59   #
JoyV
 
Seth wrote:
Either you really don't get it, or you're practicing to sell Edsels.



Reply
 
 
Mar 29, 2019 15:36:49   #
JoyV
 
Seth wrote:
Reminds me of a tee shirt I once saw that said, "I'm not arguing, I'm only explaining why I'm right."


Good one!

Reply
Mar 29, 2019 15:39:50   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
JoyV wrote:
Good one!


A very good explanation as long as it agrees with mine. LOL

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.