Washington State Passes Bill That Will Prevent Trump From Running In 2020 If He Doesn't Release Taxes
Mar 17, 2019 14:27:36 #
I wonder how many other states will pull an Alec and follow suit? I'd be surprised if a dozen more aren't all over this.
I don't see it as a possibility that he'll be running, but hey... why take chances.
No reason this is not constitutional, showing tax returns became a 40 year defacto norm that Trump shot to hell.
I don't see it as a possibility that he'll be running, but hey... why take chances.
No reason this is not constitutional, showing tax returns became a 40 year defacto norm that Trump shot to hell.
Mar 17, 2019 14:43:16 #
woodguru wrote:
I wonder how many other states will pull an Alec and follow suit? I'd be surprised if a dozen more aren't all over this.
I don't see it as a possibility that he'll be running, but hey... why take chances.
No reason this is not constitutional, showing tax returns became a 40 year defacto norm that Trump shot to hell.
I don't see it as a possibility that he'll be running, but hey... why take chances.
No reason this is not constitutional, showing tax returns became a 40 year defacto norm that Trump shot to hell.
Does the Constitution require a President to show his tax returns?
Mar 17, 2019 14:55:23 #
archie bunker wrote:
Does the Constitution require a President to show his tax returns?
No, but a state can make it a requirement for a candidate to have their name on the b****t, this is what is refered to as “states rights.”
Mar 17, 2019 14:57:47 #
Kevyn wrote:
No, but a state can make it a requirement for a candidate to have their name on the b****t, this is what is refered to as “states rights.”
Hmmmm.....could be a double edged sword, eh?
Mar 17, 2019 14:59:17 #
archie bunker wrote:
Does the Constitution require a President to show his tax returns?
The constitution allows for states to pass laws as long as they are not unconstitutional.
Trump is pushing boundaries of what the constitution doesn't say so it's forcing clarity. There is a reason presidents have been showing tax returns, and it's so the public can see conflicts of interest.
Mar 17, 2019 15:00:47 #
archie bunker wrote:
Hmmmm.....could be a double edged sword, eh?
Only if a candidate in the future refuses to show their tax returns, which none have done for 40 years.
Mar 17, 2019 15:08:40 #
woodguru wrote:
Only if a candidate in the future refuses to show their tax returns, which none have done for 40 years.
We'll see how it plays out, won't we?
You sky screamers keep trying, and he beats you at every turn, it seems.
Just my opinion.
CLLLAAANNNGGG!!!!
A lot of good topspin on that one!
Mar 17, 2019 15:17:28 #
archie bunker wrote:
We'll see how it plays out, won't we?
You sky screamers keep trying, and he beats you at every turn, it seems.
Just my opinion.
CLLLAAANNNGGG!!!!
A lot of good topspin on that one!
You sky screamers keep trying, and he beats you at every turn, it seems.
Just my opinion.
CLLLAAANNNGGG!!!!
A lot of good topspin on that one!
He just vetoed a challenge not on the wall, but on declaring a national emergency that doesn't meet the definition... it's not over
Trump is winning himself right into corners the GOP doesn't want to be cornered into.
The topspin is back at republicans, the base sees it as being about the wall, the reality is that it is about the constitutionality of taking the budget decisions away from the house and senate. This is an e******n breaker not about winning on the wall.
Mar 17, 2019 15:20:20 #
Mar 17, 2019 15:29:11 #
woodguru wrote:
He just vetoed a challenge not on the wall, but on declaring a national emergency that doesn't meet the definition... it's not over
Trump is winning himself right into corners the GOP doesn't want to be cornered into.
The topspin is back at republicans, the base sees it as being about the wall, the reality is that it is about the constitutionality of taking the budget decisions away from the house and senate. This is an e******n breaker not about winning on the wall.
Trump is winning himself right into corners the GOP doesn't want to be cornered into.
The topspin is back at republicans, the base sees it as being about the wall, the reality is that it is about the constitutionality of taking the budget decisions away from the house and senate. This is an e******n breaker not about winning on the wall.
A lot of Americans are going to be k**led by drugs, and wetbacks between now, and then. We'll see, won't we?
Mar 17, 2019 15:46:51 #
But Washington v**ers can write in the name. On the b****t.
They can't prevent their citizens from writing in Trump's name right?
That would mean Washington v****g results wouldn't be available until weeks after e******n night.
They can't prevent their citizens from writing in Trump's name right?
That would mean Washington v****g results wouldn't be available until weeks after e******n night.
Mar 17, 2019 17:12:20 #
Mar 17, 2019 17:23:30 #
MalG wrote:
another non sequitur from Archie the intellectual
Intellectual? Why, thank you Ma'am!
Mar 17, 2019 22:25:54 #
Kevyn wrote:
No, but a state can make it a requirement for a candidate to have their name on the b****t, this is what is refered to as “states rights.”
Total bullsit Not for a p**********l e******n.
Mar 18, 2019 02:28:13 #
archie bunker wrote:
A lot of Americans are going to be k**led by drugs, and wetbacks between now, and then. We'll see, won't we?
Do you know how many are being k**led by "legal" opioids? Are you aware of the way the Trump administration gutted the ability to go after and prosecute the manufacturers and distributors? And most important to the ignorance of this statement, do you know haw many drugs go right through the border stations?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.