One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
S.E. Cupp on AOC
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
Mar 11, 2019 11:19:28   #
moldyoldy
 
eagleye13 wrote:
"S.E. Cupp is a never Trumper and confirmed Trump H**er. Maybe she should have mentioned without Obama's blatant corruption and abuse of power while d**gging this country leftward...Donald Trump wouldn't have been elected. And if Obama, his operatives and appointees in his weaponized intelligence and law enforcement agencies had been able to c***t Hillary into the White House, (like they fully expected to do,) we wouldn't know anything about the treachery in the FBI, DOJ, Dept. of State and the other weaponized agencies. It isn't Donald Trump that spawned these Democrat/socialist/Marxist/c*******t politicians...they have been there for years. Hillary c***ted Bernie Sanders ,(the open socialist,) out of a fair shot at the nomination. So far-left ideology was already part and parcel of the Democrat Party. Obama, (and their unhinged hatred for President Trump,) have led them to believe they no longer have to hide their true face." - Ricktloml

That covers reality really well.
"S.E. Cupp is a never Trumper and confirmed T... (show quote)


I guess she is still a republican instead of a trump cultist.

Reply
Mar 11, 2019 11:22:12   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO
 
moldyoldy wrote:
I guess she is still a republican instead of a trump cultist.


Do you know what a RINO is mold?

Reply
Mar 11, 2019 11:26:09   #
moldyoldy
 
Jakebrake wrote:
Do you know what a RINO is mold?


Any repug who does not drink the kool aid.

Reply
 
 
Mar 11, 2019 11:26:24   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
slatten49 wrote:
S.E. Cupp: What has the age of Trump wrought? People like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

In the wake of his unprecedented campaign and unexpected e******n, the question always was: What would come after Donald Trump? What were the consequences of electing someone who was inexperienced, undeterred by and uninterested in facts and uncannily adept at whipping people into a frenzy by way of mere gesticulations and tweets?

Would Trump beget more Trumps?

Or would the pendulum swing violently back in the opposite direction, producing perhaps a return to thoughtful, accountable and intellectually rigorous leadership?

While we await what 2020 will deliver unto 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., we have our short-term answer in Congress: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

In many ways, she is in the making of Trump himself, only plausible because of him, and only justified in comparison to him.

After all, it’s hard to imagine a political system more enamored and less scrutinized of a candidate-turned-politician as AOC, if Trump hadn’t made acceptable this particular form of politicking — one driven by feelings over facts and heavily reliant on a cult of personality. And that’s just what she’s done, with charisma, charm and impressive success.

Like Trump, she’s been caught repeatedly and unabashedly making stuff up. One example, telling PBS’s “Firing Line” that unemployment was low “because everyone has two jobs.” That’s no less egregious a factual error than when Trump insisted while campaigning that he’d “seen” unemployment numbers as high as 42% (when the official unemployment rate at the time was 5.1%).

She’s also been known, like Trump, to cherry-pick information from partisan sources and extrapolate false conclusions. Late last year, she tweeted a screenshot from an article in the left-leaning Nation magazine, comparing Pentagon spending to the cost of “Medicare for all.” People immediately pounced on her distortion of the data.

And, like Trump, she makes wild policy suggestions that have little footing in reality. Raising marginal tax rates on the last dollar earned by the wealthiest Americans to 70 percent is red meat for her base but is logistically implausible , much like Trump’s porterhouse of a suggestion to end birthright citizenship .
But possibly because of Trump, she’s learned that admitting mistakes is an irrelevant — elitist even! — exercise, so instead, she turns that notion on its head, insisting that being “morally right” can be more important than being factually right. It’s not Trump’s institution-undermining “f**e news” ploy, but a populist wink at the primacy of heart-versus-head politics.

She’s inarguably taking advantage of a new landscape that Trump helped establish, and for that you can h**e the game, but not the player.

One thing that importantly separates her from him: her earnestness. No one doubts she has a set of core beliefs and a principled commitment to them, even if her own party finds them impractical or politically perilous. And if Trump could totally disrupt the political establishment without a real belief in anything but himself, imagine how much further someone with actual values — and a sense of humor, to boot — could go.

Ocasio-Cortez is applying all the tactics of Trump, but with far more charm, likability and mainstream media support. This makes her a very real and significant phenomenon. And while it would be easy to dismiss her as naïve, unserious or even flimsy, there’s one thing she’s proved: Her composition is tailor-made for the politics of right now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sarah Elizabeth (S.E.) Cupp is an American television host, political commentator, and writer as a conservative columnist for New York Daily News, contributing editor at Townhall Magazine, and a contributor for TheBlaze.
S.E. Cupp: What has the age of Trump wrought? Pe... (show quote)



Few understand that our leaders are appointed by US! The people of Venezuela elected Chavez and Maduro, so they could get free stuff, there is no free stuff, someone is paying for anything free.
The left h**e Trump as per there teaching over the years in our government-run schools. But Trump is the best thing for America. And he is the worst thing for the left for he is undoing all there bad work of 50 years.

Reply
Mar 11, 2019 11:27:04   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
moldyoldy wrote:
I guess she is still a republican instead of a trump cultist.


Rel Republican conservatives are Trumpsters.
He has got the results to MAGA.

eagleye13 wrote:
"S.E. Cupp is a never Trumper and confirmed Trump H**er. Maybe she should have mentioned without Obama's blatant corruption and abuse of power while d**gging this country leftward...Donald Trump wouldn't have been elected. And if Obama, his operatives and appointees in his weaponized intelligence and law enforcement agencies had been able to c***t Hillary into the White House, (like they fully expected to do,) we wouldn't know anything about the treachery in the FBI, DOJ, Dept. of State and the other weaponized agencies. It isn't Donald Trump that spawned these Democrat/socialist/Marxist/c*******t politicians...they have been there for years. Hillary c***ted Bernie Sanders ,(the open socialist,) out of a fair shot at the nomination. So far-left ideology was already part and parcel of the Democrat Party. Obama, (and their unhinged hatred for President Trump,) have led them to believe they no longer have to hide their true face." - Ricktloml

That covers reality really well.

Reply
Mar 11, 2019 11:29:01   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO
 
MR Mister wrote:
Few understand that our leaders are appointed by US! The people of Venezuela elected Chavez and Maduro, so they could get free stuff, there is no free stuff, someone is paying for anything free.
The left h**e Trump as per there teaching over the years in our government-run schools. But Trump is the best thing for America. And he is the worst thing for the left for he is undoing all there bad work of 50 years.


Yep, and if the l*****t socialist dimocrats continue down the road they have taken, it may not bode well for them in 20'.

Reply
Mar 11, 2019 11:41:15   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Jakebrake wrote:
Yep, and if the l*****t socialist dimocrats continue down the road they have taken, it may not bode well for them in 20'.


Kind of funny; The Dimms are having to fight for who is the moat l*****t to get their nomination.
Lets see;
Bernie
Pocahontas
Sparticus Booker

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (Minn.)

Klobuchar has already appeared on several shortlists of likely contenders for the nomination, and it’s not hard to see why.
The New Yorker called her, “popular, practical, appealing [and] progressive.” She is from a state where the currents of labor and progressivism run strong. But the no-nonsense, affable Klobuchar could also plausibly appeal to Rust Belt v**ers whom her party needs to win over.

One issue for Klobuchar right now is that she does not have a high profile outside of her native state and the Beltway. There is plenty of time to change that if she wants to run and win in 2020. But she could be eclipsed by higher-wattage candidates.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y)
Gillibrand followed in Clinton’s footsteps when she replaced her as a New York senator in 2009. Could she do the same at the p**********l level — but actually win the White House?

Gillibrand’s similarities with Clinton, superficial though they may be, could go against her. It’s just not clear Democrats would roll the dice again, as soon as 2020, on another prominent female nominee from New York.

The litter is much larger.

Reply
 
 
Mar 12, 2019 06:25:06   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
snowbear37 wrote:


Sort of like what the muslims are doing to America...start off slow and quiet until there are more voices, and then infiltrate government and America until ready to take over.


Yep, exactly right!
👍👍👍👍

Reply
Mar 12, 2019 11:32:48   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Jakebrake wrote:
Yep, and if the l*****t socialist dimocrats continue down the road they have taken, it may not bode well for them in 20'.


The USA can't afford to become another Venezuela.

Misery loves company;
BUT I am not interested!!!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.