No Slatten, the Democrats have always been there doing exactly what they are doing. At first moving slowly, un-noticed towards their agenda until Obama was elected, Obama and his administration sped things up. Then comes Hillary and Trump, the e*****rs in the the e*******l college saw what Obama was doing and if Hillary was elected our system would be Socialist. Trump was elected causing the progressives the medias and the manipulated liberals followers to irrationality as we see it today.

Now, all the Progressives in Education, medias, liberals on the side lines have gone beyond irrational thinking to insanity because the small steps they've been taking for decades are going to be, all for naught.

I don’t think S. E. Cupps credentials mean anything. The first supposed lie she attributed to Trump, she is wrong on. Damn what the average unemployment (published rate was at the time). We had 2 counties in SC @ over 42%. KY, TN, WV had many more. Maybe Trump looked at those figures. He did not say national unemployment.

Our former Governor, Nikki Haley had a better way of looking at unemployment figures. She looked at total payroll dollars/employees/hours. When Government figures said we only had 7.8%, we were 28% behind the way she calculated it & she was right. I was managing a large plant in 2008, had to lay off 40% in one day, 124 people. I went to each one them myself, did not tell their direct supervisors to do it.

If S. E. Cupps knows her history. She should know the downfall of every civilization has been the educational system, too much free time, too wealthy. AOC has a hell of a lot more in common w/ Robespierre than Trump. She should also know the swing back from totalitarian c*******m has often been more deadly.

If anyone can arrange it, I would gladly debate this lady. I’m just a lucky ol’ farm boy that does not have any pedigree, no tv, has a library card.

S.E. Cupp: What has the age of Trump wrought? People like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

In the wake of his unprecedented campaign and unexpected e******n, the question always was: What would come after Donald Trump? What were the consequences of electing someone who was inexperienced, undeterred by and uninterested in facts and uncannily adept at whipping people into a frenzy by way of mere gesticulations and tweets?

Would Trump beget more Trumps?

Or would the pendulum swing violently back in the opposite direction, producing perhaps a return to thoughtful, accountable and intellectually rigorous leadership?

While we await what 2020 will deliver unto 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., we have our short-term answer in Congress: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

In many ways, she is in the making of Trump himself, only plausible because of him, and only justified in comparison to him.

After all, it’s hard to imagine a political system more enamored and less scrutinized of a candidate-turned-politician as AOC, if Trump hadn’t made acceptable this particular form of politicking — one driven by feelings over facts and heavily reliant on a cult of personality. And that’s just what she’s done, with charisma, charm and impressive success.

Like Trump, she’s been caught repeatedly and unabashedly making stuff up. One example, telling PBS’s “Firing Line” that unemployment was low “because everyone has two jobs.” That’s no less egregious a factual error than when Trump insisted while campaigning that he’d “seen” unemployment numbers as high as 42% (when the official unemployment rate at the time was 5.1%).

She’s also been known, like Trump, to cherry-pick information from partisan sources and extrapolate false conclusions. Late last year, she tweeted a screenshot from an article in the left-leaning Nation magazine, comparing Pentagon spending to the cost of “Medicare for all.” People immediately pounced on her distortion of the data.

And, like Trump, she makes wild policy suggestions that have little footing in reality. Raising marginal tax rates on the last dollar earned by the wealthiest Americans to 70 percent is red meat for her base but is logistically implausible , much like Trump’s porterhouse of a suggestion to end birthright citizenship .
But possibly because of Trump, she’s learned that admitting mistakes is an irrelevant — elitist even! — exercise, so instead, she turns that notion on its head, insisting that being “morally right” can be more important than being factually right. It’s not Trump’s institution-undermining “f**e news” ploy, but a populist wink at the primacy of heart-versus-head politics.

She’s inarguably taking advantage of a new landscape that Trump helped establish, and for that you can h**e the game, but not the player.

One thing that importantly separates her from him: her earnestness. No one doubts she has a set of core beliefs and a principled commitment to them, even if her own party finds them impractical or politically perilous. And if Trump could totally disrupt the political establishment without a real belief in anything but himself, imagine how much further someone with actual values — and a sense of humor, to boot — could go.

Ocasio-Cortez is applying all the tactics of Trump, but with far more charm, likability and mainstream media support. This makes her a very real and significant phenomenon. And while it would be easy to dismiss her as naïve, unserious or even flimsy, there’s one thing she’s proved: Her composition is tailor-made for the politics of right now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sarah Elizabeth (S.E.) Cupp is an American television host, political commentator, and writer as a conservative columnist for New York Daily News, contributing editor at Townhall Magazine, and a contributor for TheBlaze.

S.E. Cupp is a never Trumper and confirmed Trump H**er. Maybe she should have mentioned without Obama's blatant corruption and abuse of power while d**gging this country leftward...Donald Trump wouldn't have been elected. And if Obama, his operatives and appointees in his weaponized intelligence and law enforcement agencies had been able to c***t Hillary into the White House, (like they fully expected to do,) we wouldn't know anything about the treachery in the FBI, DOJ, Dept. of State and the other weaponized agencies. It isn't Donald Trump that spawned these Democrat/socialist/Marxist/c*******t politicians...they have been there for years. Hillary c***ted Bernie Sanders ,(the open socialist,) out of a fair shot at the nomination. So far-left ideology was already part and parcel of the Democrat Party. Obama, (and their unhinged hatred for President Trump,) have led them to believe they no longer have to hide their true face.

S.E. Cupp is a never Trumper and confirmed Trump H**er. Maybe she should have mentioned without Obama's blatant corruption and abuse of power while d**gging this country leftward...Donald Trump wouldn't have been elected. And if Obama, his operatives and appointees in his weaponized intelligence and law enforcement agencies had been able to c***t Hillary into the White House, (like they fully expected to do,) we wouldn't know anything about the treachery in the FBI, DOJ, Dept. of State and the other weaponized agencies. It isn't Donald Trump that spawned these Democrat/socialist/Marxist/c*******t politicians...they have been there for years. Hillary c***ted Bernie Sanders ,(the open socialist,) out of a fair shot at the nomination. So far-left ideology was already part and parcel of the Democrat Party. Obama, (and their unhinged hatred for President Trump,) have led them to believe they no longer have to hide their true face.

S.E. Cupp: What has the age of Trump wrought? People like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

In the wake of his unprecedented campaign and unexpected e******n, the question always was: What would come after Donald Trump? What were the consequences of electing someone who was inexperienced, undeterred by and uninterested in facts and uncannily adept at whipping people into a frenzy by way of mere gesticulations and tweets?

Would Trump beget more Trumps?

Or would the pendulum swing violently back in the opposite direction, producing perhaps a return to thoughtful, accountable and intellectually rigorous leadership?

While we await what 2020 will deliver unto 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., we have our short-term answer in Congress: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

In many ways, she is in the making of Trump himself, only plausible because of him, and only justified in comparison to him.

After all, it’s hard to imagine a political system more enamored and less scrutinized of a candidate-turned-politician as AOC, if Trump hadn’t made acceptable this particular form of politicking — one driven by feelings over facts and heavily reliant on a cult of personality. And that’s just what she’s done, with charisma, charm and impressive success.

Like Trump, she’s been caught repeatedly and unabashedly making stuff up. One example, telling PBS’s “Firing Line” that unemployment was low “because everyone has two jobs.” That’s no less egregious a factual error than when Trump insisted while campaigning that he’d “seen” unemployment numbers as high as 42% (when the official unemployment rate at the time was 5.1%).

She’s also been known, like Trump, to cherry-pick information from partisan sources and extrapolate false conclusions. Late last year, she tweeted a screenshot from an article in the left-leaning Nation magazine, comparing Pentagon spending to the cost of “Medicare for all.” People immediately pounced on her distortion of the data.

And, like Trump, she makes wild policy suggestions that have little footing in reality. Raising marginal tax rates on the last dollar earned by the wealthiest Americans to 70 percent is red meat for her base but is logistically implausible , much like Trump’s porterhouse of a suggestion to end birthright citizenship .
But possibly because of Trump, she’s learned that admitting mistakes is an irrelevant — elitist even! — exercise, so instead, she turns that notion on its head, insisting that being “morally right” can be more important than being factually right. It’s not Trump’s institution-undermining “f**e news” ploy, but a populist wink at the primacy of heart-versus-head politics.

She’s inarguably taking advantage of a new landscape that Trump helped establish, and for that you can h**e the game, but not the player.

One thing that importantly separates her from him: her earnestness. No one doubts she has a set of core beliefs and a principled commitment to them, even if her own party finds them impractical or politically perilous. And if Trump could totally disrupt the political establishment without a real belief in anything but himself, imagine how much further someone with actual values — and a sense of humor, to boot — could go.

Ocasio-Cortez is applying all the tactics of Trump, but with far more charm, likability and mainstream media support. This makes her a very real and significant phenomenon. And while it would be easy to dismiss her as naïve, unserious or even flimsy, there’s one thing she’s proved: Her composition is tailor-made for the politics of right now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sarah Elizabeth (S.E.) Cupp is an American television host, political commentator, and writer as a conservative columnist for New York Daily News, contributing editor at Townhall Magazine, and a contributor for TheBlaze.