Alabama A******n Ruling Enrages Liberals
Mar 6, 2019 17:13:58 #
Of course it does. They want to k**l everything in sight including the performance of "murder" after the baby is born. How sick can you be? Anybody who has a sense of morality will NOT be v****g for these insane, heartless, pathetic excuses for human beings. https://capitalhill.org/2019/03/06/alabama-a******n-ruling-enrages-liberals/
Mar 6, 2019 17:23:23 #
fullspinzoo wrote:
Of course it does. They want to k**l everything in sight including the performance of "murder" after the baby is born. How sick can you be? Anybody who has a sense of morality will NOT be v****g for these insane, heartless, pathetic excuses for human beings. https://capitalhill.org/2019/03/06/alabama-a******n-ruling-enrages-liberals/
Unfortunately, this is just another in a long list of unconstitutional attack on Roe v. Wade, which is law of the land. I am not saying that it was a futile attempt because it helps raise awareness about the a******n issue, which is good and needs greater discussion. Yet defending the law of the land, no matter how seemingly bad that law is, is what a patriot does: protects the Constitution.
Mar 6, 2019 17:36:30 #
fullspinzoo wrote:
Of course it does. They want to k**l everything in sight including the performance of "murder" after the baby is born. How sick can you be? Anybody who has a sense of morality will NOT be v****g for these insane, heartless, pathetic excuses for human beings. https://capitalhill.org/2019/03/06/alabama-a******n-ruling-enrages-liberals/
Amen and Amen
Mar 6, 2019 19:31:22 #
rumitoid wrote:
Unfortunately, this is just another in a long list of unconstitutional attack on Roe v. Wade, which is law of the land. I am not saying that it was a futile attempt because it helps raise awareness about the a******n issue, which is good and needs greater discussion. Yet defending the law of the land, no matter how seemingly bad that law is, is what a patriot does: protects the Constitution.
Funny. Why don't you feel the same about i*********n l*w? Hmmmmmmm..........
Mar 6, 2019 21:09:51 #
archie bunker wrote:
Funny. Why don't you feel the same about i*********n l*w? Hmmmmmmm..........
I do. But you never asked my opinion on it because you believe all Liberals are for open borders, and you would have to bribe a Liberal to claim he or she was for open borders. You can even see tonight in two other threads where I am strongly for i*********n l*ws, though in one way, about asylum seekers, not what you want to hear as the law.
Mar 6, 2019 22:29:42 #
rumitoid wrote:
Unfortunately, this is just another in a long list of unconstitutional attack on Roe v. Wade, which is law of the land. I am not saying that it was a futile attempt because it helps raise awareness about the a******n issue, which is good and needs greater discussion. Yet defending the law of the land, no matter how seemingly bad that law is, is what a patriot does: protects the Constitution.
This is an attack on Roe v. Wade. Enlighten me where in the Constitution the Supreme Court gives a ruling on a case, it becomes the Law of the Land. The court is ruling on that case, just as all other courts. Under the Constitution Laws are passed by Congress. Under the Constitution, please enlighten me how the Supreme Court has the authority to make Law for Land. Please explain, how a person convicted of k*****g a pregnant woman can be charged and convicted of a double homicide but k*****g an unborn or born baby is not murder. I consider myself a patriot. I served thirty-eight years in the military defending the constitution. I also serve my Bible which is a bedrock of that constitution. Murder is murder. And these are innocent murders. How anyone can condone this barbaric genocide, I can not understand.
Mar 7, 2019 01:09:35 #
PLT Sarge wrote:
This is an attack on Roe v. Wade. Enlighten me whe... (show quote)
Seriously? Congress passed the law, SCOTUS upheld it as law. Pretty simple. If you have served in the military defending the Constitution since 1776, you still have one v**e and one opinion. Trying to make what you say or think grander by always repeating your years of service is getting tired. Thank you for your great service, but enough. Just speak like a citizen.
Mar 7, 2019 01:40:25 #
rumitoid wrote:
Seriously? Congress passed the law, SCOTUS upheld it as law. Pretty simple. If you have served in the military defending the Constitution since 1776, you still have one v**e and one opinion. Trying to make what you say or think grander by always repeating your years of service is getting tired. Thank you for your great service, but enough. Just speak like a citizen.
Same thing with gay marriage too, huh?
Mar 7, 2019 02:03:40 #
archie bunker wrote:
Same thing with gay marriage too, huh?
Equal under the law: is that wrong?
Mar 7, 2019 04:45:38 #
Mar 7, 2019 06:12:22 #
crazylibertarian
Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
rumitoid wrote:
Unfortunately, this is just another in a long list of unconstitutional attack on Roe v. Wade, which is law of the land. I am not saying that it was a futile attempt because it helps raise awareness about the a******n issue, which is good and needs greater discussion. Yet defending the law of the land, no matter how seemingly bad that law is, is what a patriot does: protects the Constitution.
Roe vs. Wade is NOT the 'law of the land.' The Supreme Court cdoes not make law, the legislature and executive do.
Roe vs. Wade was a suspect decision written by Richard Nixon's third choice for a Supreme Court seat, Harry Blackmun. I suggest you read it. It has no logical flow.
As usual, you distort history. It's about par for a liberal.
Mar 7, 2019 06:51:39 #
rumitoid wrote:
Seriously? Congress passed the law, SCOTUS upheld it as law. Pretty simple. If you have served in the military defending the Constitution since 1776, you still have one v**e and one opinion. Trying to make what you say or think grander by always repeating your years of service is getting tired. Thank you for your great service, but enough. Just speak like a citizen.
As a Christian are we to obey or sanction immoral laws?
Mar 7, 2019 09:16:40 #
rumitoid wrote:
Seriously? Congress passed the law, SCOTUS upheld it as law. Pretty simple. If you have served in the military defending the Constitution since 1776, you still have one v**e and one opinion. Trying to make what you say or think grander by always repeating your years of service is getting tired. Thank you for your great service, but enough. Just speak like a citizen.
Just out of curiosity, when in your mind, does a baby become a human being?
Mar 7, 2019 10:09:29 #
rumitoid wrote:
Unfortunately, this is just another in a long list of unconstitutional attack on Roe v. Wade, which is law of the land. I am not saying that it was a futile attempt because it helps raise awareness about the a******n issue, which is good and needs greater discussion. Yet defending the law of the land, no matter how seemingly bad that law is, is what a patriot does: protects the Constitution.
You would have made a great Tory during the American Revolution.
Mar 7, 2019 10:13:39 #
fullspinzoo wrote:
Just out of curiosity, when in your mind, does a baby become a human being?
When, in your mind, does a product of human conception attain the status of "baby?"
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.