young woman was about to finish her first year of college. Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be very liberal, and among other liberal ideals, was very much in favor of higher taxes to support more government programs, in other words redistribution of wealth.


She was deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch conservative, a feeling she openly expressed. Based on the lectures that she had participated in, and the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that her father had for years harbored an evil, selfish desire to keep what he thought should be his.


One day she was challenging her father on his opposition to higher taxes on the rich and the need for more government programs.
The self-professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors had to be the t***h and she indicated so to her father.


He responded by asking how she was doing in school.


Taken aback, she answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, and let him know that it was tough to maintain, insisting that she was taking a very difficult course load and was constantly studying, which left her no time to go out and party like other people she knew. She didn't even have time for a boyfriend, and didn't really have many college friends because she spent all her time studying.


Her father listened and then asked, "How is your friend Audrey
doing?"


She replied, "Audrey is barely getting by. All she takes are easy classes, she never studies and she barely has a 2.0 GPA. She is so popular on campus; college for her is a blast. She's always invited to all the parties and lots of times she doesn't even show up for classes because she's too hung over."


Her father asked his daughter, "Why don't you go to the Dean's office and ask him to deduct 1.0 off your GPA and give it to your friend who only has a 2.0.


That way you will both have a 3.0 GPA and certainly that would be a fair and equal distribution of GPA."


The daughter, visibly shocked by her father's suggestion, angrily fired back, "That's a crazy idea, how would that be fair? I've worked really hard for my grades! I've invested a lot of time, and a lot of hard work! Audrey has done next to nothing toward her degree. She played while I worked my tail off!"


The father slowly smiled, winked and said gently, "Welcome to the conservative side of the fence."


If you ever wondered what side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test!


*If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one. If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.


*If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat. If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.


*If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation. A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him..


*If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels. Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.


*If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church. A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and Jesus silenced.


*If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.. A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.


*If a conservative reads this, he'll present it to his friends so they can can have a good laugh. A liberal will delete it because he or she is "offended."


*Well, I presented it to you.....It's Your call

So all the teacher's in the academic world are teaching the youths wrong,So we are adverse to the Republic of China for nothing,not to mention that that is still a Russian republic even though their no longer the UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC.
Have ever see the classic movie inherit the wind.The teacher taught a curriculum (Darwin's theory of Evolution)that was not sanctioned by the governing academic boards and he was put on trial, possibly pending his dismissal.The point is ,is that if a teacher is teaching anything other than the prescribed curriculum they run the risk of being of being terminated.They teach that first and foremost that this a Democracy.
I suggest that you study up and comprehend the meanings and definitions of Republics, democracies Socialisim, c*******m, Mercantilism, Monarchies,dictatorships, ogliarchisim, f*****m,You should learn to understand to distinguish between those doctrines that are social governing doctrines and those that are economic doctrines.

As for, "...the descendants [of Sally Hemings], DNA testing traced them to the uncle of Thomas Jefferson", seeing as how that uncle died in 1765, it is unlikely that any of the children of Sally Hemings (born 1773) were his. But it is understandable how a quick read might lead one to think this.
This New York Times article gives a short explanation of the study that indicates that Thomas Jefferson was the father of at least one of Sally Hemings' children.
https://www.nytimes.com/1998/11/01/us/dna-test-finds-evidence-of-jefferson-child-by-s***e.html

This also tells about the study:
https://www.monticello.org/site/plantation-and-s***ery/thomas-jefferson-and-sally-hemings-brief-account

Whether Jefferson was "a r****t and raper of s***es", might depend on how one defines "r****t" and "raper".

Jefferson married his cousin Martha in 1772. Sally Hemings was born in 1773. Six years after their marriage, their third child, Polly, who Sally became the companion of, born. When Jefferson was sent to Paris in 1784, he was a grieving widower. He took his eldest daughter, Patsy and amongst the s***e he took was Sally's older brother who studied French cuisine while there. When Polly was sent for soon after, Sally was sent with her as companion and playmate, as well as an older s***e to care for the two.

The version being pressed on us is that Sally and Jefferson had a love affair (or her raped her) in Paris. She is portrayed as a young adult who became pregnant with her eldest child while in Paris. But being born in 1773 and going to Paris in 1784, she was 11 years old. They also want us to believe Sally was one of the s***es Martha brought with her to the marriage a year before she was born.

Unless they not only believe Jefferson was a p*******e, having sex with prepubescent child, but also that a prepubescent child could get pregnant; the chance he fathered a child on Sally in Paris are exceedingly slim. At least one of Sally's births took place shortly after Jefferson had returned from a 15 month absence. Unless human biology was suspended for Sally, Jefferson could not have been the fathe

In 1802 the journalist James T. Callender, after being refused an appointment to a Postmaster position by Jefferson and issuing veiled threats of "consequences," reported that Jefferson had fathered several children with a s***e concubine named Sally. This is the basis of the claim.

DNA study was done by Dr Eugene Foster. The results clearly show that the male-line descendants of Field Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson's uncle, and Eston Hemings, Sally Hemings youngest son; have identical Y-c********e haplotypes. No Y c********e evidence was found that the descendants of Sally's other children were related to Thomas Jefferson, his uncle, his son, or grandson. Yet the media stories claim the DNA testing proved the Hemings' descendants were Thomas Jefferson's.

As for Field Jefferson dying before Sally Hemings was born, that is so. But he had 5 sons.