Airforceone wrote:
Okay let’s agree to disagree that C*****e c****e is a h**x. Republicans are science deniers and that’s not going to change.
So let’s actually debate renewables on its own and leave c*****e c****e out of the subject and take a look at renewables from a health issue and what it would do for our economy.
(SO NO C*****E C****E ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEMOCRATIC G***N E****Y AGENDA.
Solar and wind power are creating jobs at a rate 12 times faster than that of the rest of the US economy and Trump takes the credit for these jobs. Trump constantly quotes that renewable energy is a bad investment.
The renewable energy sector has seen rapid rapid growth over recent years, driven by reduction in manufacturing and installation costs. Jobs are growing at a rate of 20% per year. There are 4.5 million jobs in renewables which is up from 3.4 million in 2011. Again Trump leads you to believe it’s a bad investment.
Now compared to f****l f**l technologies which are typically mechanized and capital intensive, the renewable energy industry is more labor intensive. More jobs are created for each unit of electricity generated from renewable sources than from f****l f**ls.
(IMPROVES PUBLIC HEALTH)
Air and water pollution emitted by coal, natural gas, fuel, is linked with breathing problems, neurological damage, heart attacks, cancer and a host of other serious problems. Estimated cost to the public health $74.6 billion a year. Not even the republicans can deny this.
(INEXHAUSTIBLE ENERGY)
We will not run out of strong winds, sunny skies and fast moving water. Wow what a great progressive idea free fuel. I wonder who thought of that.
(STABLE ENERGY PRICES OMG THE FUEL IS FREE)
Renewable energy is providing affordable electricity across the country right now and can help stabilize energy prices.
Although renewable facilities require an up front investment to build they operate at a low cost because Wow the fuel is free.
Renewable energy technology cost have declined steadily. Example the average cost to install solar dropped more than 70% between 2010 and 2017, wind dropped 66%. Cost are expected to drop even further.
F****l f**l prices vary dramatically and are prone to substantial price swings. Not even republicans can deny that. No price swings with renewables the fuel is free. Wow free fuel clean air and water. Now that’s a bad progressive idea.
The US now has 500 wind power manufactor facilities that support 50,000 jobs just in manufacturing and over 600,000 jobs total. Solar has a total of 347,000 jobs now and that has doubled in number since 2012 and now have over 10,000 companies that generate $17 billion to our economy. That’s more than the Trump tax cuts for the wealthy.
Trump is trying to eliminate subsidies for g***n e****y but the oil subsidies will stay in place. All to prevent the American people from free fuel to generate power clean air and water and stop polluting our oceans.
As the industry continues its rapid growth the demand will accelerate for massive job creation. Just get Trump and his ignorant base the hell out of the way.
Trump likes to lie to keep his ignorant base in line with the amount of land required so I did a little research. According to a 2008 analysis by the Renewable Energy laboratory to power the US with solar is about 0.6% of the US land mass.
China now makes about 60% of the worlds solar cells, and 71% of the solar panels. Solar and Wind has been slowed in the US because of the republicans love of f****l f**ls and China has taken advantage and now lead the world on renewables because of US politics called Republican stupidity while progressives is a bad word. Wow progressives trying to utilize free fuel to generate electricity OMG what a bad idea.
The Jobs analysis provided by AltEnergy stocks which found 5.3 jobs per $1 million for f****l f**l investments versus renewables 16.7 jobs per $1 million. If republicans would drop there love for f****l f**l and were all in on utilizing free fuel to generate electricity it would create an economic boom in this country like non other in our history.
Solar workforce in 2017 increased by 25% wind increased by 32% and Trump takes the credit for job creation. Then he lies about coal job creation. How many jobs created in the coal industry versus renewables.
So no more c*****e c****e denial we will never get a bunch of ignorant people to understand c*****e c****e that read articles that are written by the Koch Brothers super PACs. Because republicans don’t understand the difference between c*****e c****e and our daily weather changes.
Just think about the health risk from breathing in this garbage and the water we drink, polluting our oceans, and forget about c*****e c****e.
It’s estimated that by 2050 most of the world will be powered by renewables and Trump and his ignorant supporters will still be trying to dig for coal.
Okay let’s agree to disagree that C*****e c****e i... (
show quote)
While the idea of companies powered by renewables sounds great, it isn't so simple. Some of the questions to ask is;
1) Does it have large hidden f****l f**l outlays such as biofuels grown with fertilizer, f****l f**l run equipment, electric cars run on coal generated electricity, or the amount of f****l f**ls used to create electric cars vs gasoline cars? Estimated production of an average gasoline operated car will involve emissions amounting to the equivalent of 5.6 tonnes of CO2, while for an average electric car, the figure is 8.8tonnes
2) Can it be used in large scale for cities. Where will acres of solar panels or wind turbines be put to power eastern cities?
3) Is the subsidy benefiting any but the wealthy? Tesla gets hundreds of millions in taxpayer subsidies to make green cars which they sell for exorbitant prices to the wealthy to make high profits for multimillionairs. Is that where our taxpayer's dollars should go? But hey. It's GREEN!!!!
4) How much energy can be gained for the subsidized money? Mar 23, 2018 - A study by the University of Texas projected that U.S. energy subsidies per megawatt hour in 2019 would be $0.5 for coal, $1- $2 for oil and natural gas, $15- $57 for wind and $43- $320 for solar.
A few failed or failing subsidized green companies.
Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
Solyndra ($535 million)*
Beacon Power ($43 million)*
Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
SunPower ($1.2 billion)
First Solar ($1.46 billion)
Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
Amonix ($5.9 million)
Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
Abound Solar ($400 million)*
A123 Systems ($279 million)*
Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
Johnson Controls ($299 million)
Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
ECOtality ($126.2 million)
Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
Range Fuels ($80 million)*
Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
GreenVolts ($500,000)
Vestas ($50 million)
LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
Navistar ($39 million)
Satcon ($3 million)*
Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)
*Denotes companies that have filed for bankruptcy.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2012/10/18/president-obamas-taxpayer-backed-green-energy-failures/