"Wait until she has been around a few years"?

Who has to wait. She already has Dem Reps distancing themselves from her as well as shaking their heads.
She is already sinking herself with no help from anyone else.
The gift that keeps on giving I'd say.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez slammed over anti-Amazon push in New York City billboard: 'Thanks for nothing'
By Liam Quinn, Adam Shaw Published February 20

“The Amazon pullout is a perfect example of what we’ve been saying: socialism takes and capitalism creates,” Alfredo Ortiz, JCN president and CEO said in a release on Wednesday.

“The economic consequences of the HQ2 termination gives America a small taste of the harm that is to come if Ocasio-Cortez’s anti-business canon comes to fruition and is made federal policy.”
Full story:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-slammed-over-anti-amazon-push-in-new-york-city-billboard-thanks-for-nothing

You are blaming that young lady

Ah, the conservatives, they think they are mighty special. Alas for them, much of the civilized world is coming to the conclusion that it would be better off without them. Conservatives in most modern countries have become a lot more liberal, to their own, as well as their nation's, relief and benefit. These are not called "liberal democracies" for nothing. Among this collection of advanced nations, America is quickly falling far behind. Many other countries are now more "American" in their values than we are. We are being r****ded by conservatives.Our conservatives - steeped in the myth of the rugged individual, as portrayed in so many westerns, cop thrillers, sci-fi and fantasy flicks - are determined to cling to their backwardness as hard as they cling to their AK-47s. This type of hero is how every American conservative thinks of themselves. Rambo is a good example, or one of those drivers in the Fast and Furious series. It all is a fantasy. Their self image is flipped upside down and inside out from reality. They think they are heroically defending America when they are actually villainously defending the tradition of domination and ever threatening to rip the real cloth of American values.

Hey you hero Doneraldo Schtrumpkinski is the Russian agent here not me --I'm just the son of a dust bowl Okie. Of course, lost on the conservatives is the irony that they, of all ideologues, the ones who opposed American independence and nationhood from the start (and still don't believe in its essential tenets), then stomped off in a huff during the Civil War, and threaten to secede once again every time they lose an e******n, would appoint themselves the Inquisition empowered to remove the liberal brand upon which our country is actually founded. How rich. The Founding Fathers would be howling in laughter and scorn, easily recognizing conservatism as the same as it ever was: the ideology that marinates in incoherency even as it bubbles with h**e.
Of course becoming the monsters they h**e is always an option for conservatives. Because they really have no scruples, no higher values, no virtue... just a crazy quilt of quasi-religious, pseudo-rational, inconsistent, contradictory and hypocritical beliefs and raw "gut feeling." So it makes sense that they would become terrorists to thwart terrorism, destroy the village to save it, become torturers to find and k**l other torturers, o*******w American democracy and all American values to prove to each other what macho "Americans" they are. An eye for an eye... the world is so easy, so black-and-white. That the "libtards" can't figure this out is proof positive to conservatives of their ideological and intellectual superiority.

You lost me there, Nikolai Nikolaevich.

It seems to me that while us conservatives support things like a healthy economy, job creation, low taxes, limited government, a strong military, border security and liberty, all those things this country was founded on, you portsiders support programs and policies that inevitably result in rampant unemployment and high taxes, a weak economy, voluminous government which infringes on our liberties, open borders and a weak military. As bonuses, your lot also offers g****r confusion politics and preferential "treatment" for L***Q types being forced on the unwilling, infanticide, the destruction of our historic monuments, the teaching of American history to children revised to fit your current day social justice and identity politics templates and the worst performing public education system in the developed and, for that matter, much of the undeveloped world.

So tell me, why would any sane, reasonably patriotic American want to experience the end result of that which your party represents?

You lost me there, Nikolai Nikolaevich.

It seems to me that while us conservatives support things like a healthy economy, job creation, low taxes, limited government, a strong military, border security and liberty, all those things this country was founded on, you portsiders support programs and policies that inevitably result in rampant unemployment and high taxes, a weak economy, voluminous government which infringes on our liberties, open borders and a weak military. As bonuses, your lot also offers g****r confusion politics and preferential "treatment" for L***Q types being forced on the unwilling, infanticide, the destruction of our historic monuments, the teaching of American history to children revised to fit your current day social justice and identity politics templates and the worst performing public education system in the developed and, for that matter, much of the undeveloped world.

So tell me, why would any sane, reasonably patriotic American want to experience the end result of that which your party represents?

My description was of ideology. Not surprisingly, the ideology matches with the party. Ideological characteristics from the civil War and beyond included, Constitution; rule of law; right to defend oneself; defense of our constitution and by extension defend the states; property rights; e******y for ALL with no special treatment or rules for some groups over others. These are some of the ideology characteristics of those who fought to end s***ery in the Civil War! These are some of the characteristics of those who worked against Jim Crow laws! These are some of the characteristics of those who promoted, risked their lives for, and v**ed for the Civil Rights Bill. These are some of the characteristics of those who ended segregation. It just so happens that all the above were done almost exclusively by Republicans!!!! The ideology and party match!

This farce that one day all the r****t Democrats woke up and decided to switch to the Republican party, and the Republicans switched to the Democrat party is a myth. There have been a grand total of ONE Democrat Senator who switched from Democrat to Republican during the time from the Civil War to the signing of the Civil Rights Bill. Strom Thurmond! There have been two in the late 80s and 90s, but far too late to have had any part in the civil rights movement. Richard Shelby and Ben Campbell. And there was a grand total of ONE who switched from Silver Republican to Democrat. Fred Dubois in 1901.

Here are the Republican Party platforms of 1860 and 2016. They are substantially the same. Our ideology has not changed!

http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/republican-party-platform-1860/
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/2016-republican-party-platform

The Democratic Party platform has changed considerably. The platform of 1856 included:
1. That Congress has no power under the Constitution, to interfere with or control the domestic institutions of the several States, and that such States are the sole and proper judges of everything appertaining to their own affairs, not prohibited by the Constitution; that all efforts of the abolitionists, or others, made to induce Congress to interfere with questions of s***ery, or to take incipient steps in relation thereto, are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences; and that all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people and endanger the stability and permanency of the Union, and ought not to be countenanced by any friend of our political institutions.

2. That the foregoing proposition covers, and was intended to embrace the whole subject of s***ery agitation in Congress; and therefore, the Democratic party of the Union, standing on this national platform, will abide by and adhere to a faithful execution of the acts known as the compromise measures, settled by the Congress of 1850; "the act for reclaiming fugitives from service or labor," included; which act being designed to carry out an express provision of the Constitution, cannot, with fidelity thereto, be repealed, or so changed as to destroy or impair its efficiency.

3. That the Democratic party will resist all attempts at renewing, in Congress or out of it, the agitation of the s***ery question under wh**ever shape or color the attempt may be made.

4. That the Democratic party will faithfully abide by and uphold, the principles laid down in the Kentucky and Virginia resolutions of 1798, and in the report of Mr. Madison to the Virginia Legislature in 1799; that it adopts those principles as constituting one of the main foundations of its political creed, and is resolved to carry them out in their obvious meaning and import.

And that we may more distinctly meet the issue on which a sectional party, subsisting exclusively on s***ery agitation, now relies to test the fidelity of the people, North and South, to the Constitution and the Union—

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/1856-democratic-party-platform
https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2016_DNC_Platform.pdf

Note in the 2016 platform that all the the goals are to be done through taxpayers funding them and not through creating an environment which encourages Americans to choose and act for those goals of there own free will!


It is a characteristic of progressives to claim credit for what others have done and to cast blame on others for what they have done. Obama was good at doing so with a sincere sounding voice and expression.